Where were the busses?

[Raziaar]

Come back and address the question please. Thousands of people have died so I find it disturbing that you find this humorous because I certainly don't.

Umm... how is the part I find humorous bad? The part I find humorous is the fact you keep trailing me around, in different threads, mind you, harrassing me, asking me the same question over and over. The funny part is that I don't answer you, and you come back again and again. How does that have *ANYTHING* to do with people who have died? Does my feelings about the president have ANYTHING to do with the people who have died? No. It doesn't. So don't go there. You make it sound like if i say the president is incompetent that somehow it'll save lives.

Go read another fairytale.

 

[No Limit]

Umm... how is the part I find humorous bad? The part I find humorous is the fact you keep trailing me around, in different threads, mind you, harrassing me, asking me the same question over and over. The funny part is that I don't answer you, and you come back again and again. How does that have *ANYTHING* to do with people who have died? Does my feelings about the president have ANYTHING to do with the people who have died? No. It doesn't. So don't go there. You make it sound like if i say the president is incompetent that somehow it'll save lives.

Go read another fairytale.

Come back when you want to take this seriously as I said in the other thread.

You can not dispute that Bush is incompetent yet you can't bring yourself to admit it. You don't know what local officials could have done differently yet you continue to place blame on them. Don't waste my time.

 

[Raziaar]

Come back when you want to take this seriously as I said in the other thread.

You can not dispute that Bush is incompetent yet you can't bring yourself to admit it. You don't know what local officials could have done differently yet you continue to place blame on them. Don't waste my time.

I am being serious. What part about it cant you understand, the many times I have said it? I don't have a desire to refute anything, I never came here to refute what you're trying to get me to refute, so why keep bothering with it?

I have no desire whatsoever to announce whether or not I think bush is incompetent or not. If there was an official vote that affected american politics, I would voice my opinion there, but until then. I'm not going to do it just to satisfy some rabid left-wing forum debater.

How many times do I have to say "NO i'm not going to answer" before you stop asking the question? And the only person here wasting your time is yourself. Nobody is making you respond to my poorly constructed posts, right?


Right.

 

[southernman17]

It was failure at all levels of government Federal>State>Local Even though I'm conservative, I blame Bush for colossal failure. But I also blame Gov. Blanco and Nagin and FEMA. This should not be a liberal/conservative fight, rather a citizen/ruling body fight.

 

[No Limit]

I am being serious. What part about it cant you understand, the many times I have said it? I don't have a desire to refute anything, I never came here to refute what you're trying to get me to refute, so why keep bothering with it?

I have no desire whatsoever to announce whether or not I think bush is incompetent or not. If there was an official vote that affected american politics, I would voice my opinion there, but until then. I'm not going to do it just to satisfy some rabid left-wing forum debater.

How many times do I have to say "NO i'm not going to answer" before you stop asking the question? And the only person here wasting your time is yourself. Nobody is making you respond to my poorly constructed posts, right?


Right.

Okay, then don't bother posting in my threads. Your logic is down right idiotic and you are making a fool of yourself. You can not defend any of you "positions" yet you will not change your mind. Come back when you want to have a discussion, I got you in a corner right now and I almost feel bad beating up on you like this.

 

[No Limit]

It was failure at all levels of government Federal>State>Local Even though I'm conservative, I blame Bush for colossal failure. But I also blame Gov. Blanco and Nagin and FEMA. This should not be a liberal/conservative fight, rather a citizen/ruling body fight.

Did you read anything in this thread? What did you want local officials to do differently? And before you respond please read the thread.

 

[Raziaar]

Okay, then don't bother posting in my threads. Your logic is down right idiotic and you are making a fool of yourself. You can not defend any of you "positions" yet you will not change your mind. Come back when you want to have a discussion, I got you in a corner right now and I almost feel bad beating up on you like this.

Beating me up? <chuckles> I swear, sometimes you think far too highly of yourself. With an ego that big, i'm surprised you can stand up.

Maybe it never occured to you, but i'm not a good debater on political subjects. I don't pretend to be. I come to read your bitching and moaning. Honest.


Oh and... P.S. It still hasn't gotten through your head that most of the points in this thread I agree with. The fact that bush screwed up, and FEMA screwed up. yet you still bitch and gripe and moan and groan like a dog in heat. Its hilarious to see how worked up you get. I admit I get worked up too sometimes, but its especially amusing to watch somebody who thinks they are good at debating(like you), try to go up against somebody like myself who admittedly sucks at it, and watching the former puff his chest out and strut around like some victorious champion, when in fact he just flops around a little bit before extinguishing.

 

[No Limit]

Beating me up? <chuckles> I swear, sometimes you think far too highly of yourself. With an ego that big, i'm surprised you can stand up.

Maybe it never occured to you, but i'm not a good debater on political subjects. I don't pretend to be. I come to read your bitching and moaning. Honest.


Oh and... P.S. It still hasn't gotten through your head that most of the points in this thread I agree with. The fact that bush screwed up, and FEMA screwed up. yet you still bitch and gripe and moan and groan like a dog in heat. Its hilarious to see how worked up you get. I admit I get worked up too sometimes, but its especially amusing to watch somebody who thinks they are good at debating(like you), try to go up against somebody like myself who admittedly sucks at it, and watching the former puff his chest out and strut around like some victorious champion, when in fact he just flops around a little bit before extinguishing.

You act like debating is some kind of sport. It really isn't. Being a good debater has nothing to do with anything, its how informed you are on the issues and with all due respect you don't know shit about anything that goes on around you.

I am not someone that has any prior experiance in debating nor do I have an interest in offical debates. What I love is presenting you with facts that refute your opinions. When you aren't able to defend your opinions with facts your opinions are wrong. Normal people will admit they are wrong but people like you will say stuff like "I will not answer that but I still believe what I believe because I'm a hard headed fool" or resort to a personal attack like you just did. You can not defend the competence of Bush yet you still say he is competent because you do not want to face reality.

Now for the main point, you are again not understanding this. I know you think FEMA ****ed up, that is not the point. The point is you are saying local officals are just as responsible for what happened. When I ask you what do you think local officials should have done differently you can not give me a reply because the fact is local officials did all they could. You have this neo-con mentallity stuck in you and no matter how many facts you are presented with you simply cover your ears and then make up some excuse that you aren't a good debater. This has nothing to do with debating, I presented you will 3 pages of facts, you haven't refuted shit (contrary to your claims) but what's sad is you still have the same position on this disaster as you did before this thread even started; that local officials are just as responsible and that Bush is a good leader. You don't know why you have that position, you can not defend that position, you simply know that is your position and you'll stick to it no matter how many facts you are presented with.

 

[Raziaar]

You act like debating is some kind of sport. It really isn't. Being a good debater has nothing to do with anything, its how informed you are on the issues and with all due respect you don't know shit about anything that goes on around you.

I am not someone that has any prior experiance in debating nor do I have an interest in offical debates. What I love is presenting you with facts that refute your opinions. When you aren't able to defend your opinions with facts your opinions are wrong. Normal people will admit they are wrong but people like you will say stuff like "I will not answer that but I still believe what I believe because I'm a hard headed fool" or resort to a personal attack like you just did. You can not defend the competence of Bush yet you still say he is competent because you do not want to face reality.

I never said bush is competent. I never said he wasn't competent either. You know, you really ought to stop putting words in peoples mouths. I'm not in denial. I'm not lacking facts on the matter. I just don't want to discuss that stupid point with you. You're acting like a 3 yeard old bugging somebody again and again to get an answer just as a sign of acknoledgement that somebody notices them. Cut it out, you little runt!

Now for the main point, you are again not understanding this. I know you think FEMA ****ed up, that is not the point. The point is you are saying local officals are just as responsible for what happened. When I ask you what do you think local officials should have done differently you can not give me a reply because the fact is local officials did all they could. You have this neo-con mentallity stuck in you and no matter how many facts you are presented with you simply cover your ears and then make up some excuse that you aren't a good debater. This has nothing to do with debating, I presented you will 3 pages of facts, you haven't refuted shit (contrary to your claims) but what's sad is you still have the same position on this disaster as you did before this thread even started; that local officials are just as responsible and that Bush is a good leader. You don't know why you have that position, you can not defend that position, you simply know that is your position and you'll stick to it no matter how many facts you are presented with.

And there you go again with it, putting words in my mouth. Bush is a good leader? WHen did I say that? Again, that three year old mentality. Cut it out! <slaps your wrist>


Okay. I'm walking away from this now. Think of it how you will. Whether you wanna think I simply can't face the truth and want to walk away while I can, or whether you want to think i'm tired of listening to this god awful broken record named No Limit.

I'll go with the latter, personally. Seriously man. Don't you have 5 more useless threads that repeat the same thing over and over and over againt to post in politics before the day is out?



And just for my own reading pleasure, you keep throwing words around like facts. So throw around the facts that you claimed elsewhere, that Iraq had absolutely 0 terrorists. You claimed it as a 100% fact, I wanna see where you got this info from. I see people refute your calims all the time on these forums. But your only defense to them is that they posted from a biased site. Funny, considering 99% of yours come from democraticunderground, or whatever its called.

A website that can't even cater to its own political party, rife with bullshit all around.

From the left

Critics of the site allege that the site administrators and moderators are biased against, and unfairly ban ("tombstone") or censor, posters who consider themselves to be to the political left of John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic nominee for the US presidency. Some critics are affiliated with the People for Change forums, which were founded by Howard Dean supporters who felt alienated from Democratic Underground during the contentious primary season; many of these posters had been banned or were later banned from the Democratic Underground forums.

These people claim that DU is not truly liberal or progressive, but rather centrist. In particular, many members claim that the moderators of the Israel-Palestinian forums enforce an anti-Palestinian bias or adhere too strongly to the politics of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council (DLC).

A recent internal poll showed 14% of DUers would vote for John McCain if he ran against Hillary Clinton while 33% would vote for Hugo Chavez. Democratic Underground has also been accused of banning pro-Hillary Clinton posters, thus in opposition to views of many Democrats.

 

[No Limit]

I never said bush is competent. I never said he wasn't competent either. You know, you really ought to stop putting words in peoples mouths. I'm not in denial. I'm not lacking facts on the matter. I just don't want to discuss that stupid point with you. You're acting like a 3 yeard old bugging somebody again and again to get an answer just as a sign of acknoledgement that somebody notices them. Cut it out, you little runt!

Definition = I know I am wrong but I will not admit it.

And there you go again with it, putting words in my mouth. Bush is a good leader? WHen did I say that? Again, that three year old mentality. Cut it out! <slaps your wrist>


Okay. I'm walking away from this now. Think of it how you will. Whether you wanna think I simply can't face the truth and want to walk away while I can, or whether you want to think i'm tired of listening to this god awful broken record named No Limit.

I'll go with the latter, personally. Seriously man. Don't you have 5 more useless threads that repeat the same thing over and over and over againt to post in politics before the day is out?

Definition = I know I am wrong but I will not admit it.

I also appreciate the signature addition, shows your level of maturity.

 

[Raziaar]

Definition = I know I am wrong but I will not admit it.



Definition = I know I am wrong but I will not admit it.

I also appreciate the signature addition, shows your level of maturity.

I put it there after I witnessed your level of maturity. I mean. Look at these quality responses <gazes up at the above quote>

Not to mention following me around like a dog all day in various threads.


You're one of those people that just cannot accept peoples views for what they are, even if they have no opinion whatsoever on the matter. So instead, you have to tell them what they are thinking, how they are feeling. Which we all know, is utter bullshit.

 

[No Limit]

I put it there after I witnessed your level of maturity. I mean. Look at these quality responses <gazes up at the above quote>

How did you want me to respond? You will not address my points, you resort to personal attacks. Thats honestly the best response I could give you.

Not to mention following me around like a dog all day in various threads.

I think you think too highly of yourself. Grow up.

You're one of those people that just cannot accept peoples views for what they are, even if they have no opinion whatsoever on the matter. So instead, you have to tell them what they are thinking, how they are feeling. Which we all know, is utter bullshit.

I can not accept your views because your views are wrong as I proved. You are making little sense and you are making a fool of yourself. For a moment earlier I figured we can have a good discussion but after you couldn't reply with talking points anymore suddenly you resorted to your childish behavior and I lost that hope. I'm done.

 

[Raziaar]

How did you want me to respond? You will not address my points, you resort to personal attacks. Thats honestly the best response I could give you.

I think you think too highly of yourself. Grow up.

I can not accept your views because your views are wrong as I proved. You are making little sense and you are making a fool of yourself. For a moment earlier I figured we can have a good discussion but after you couldn't reply with talking points anymore suddenly you resorted to your childish behavior and I lost that hope. I'm done.

You ever stopped to think that your 'talking points' that I wouldnt discuss, were off topic? Hrmmmmmmmmmm.

 

[No Limit]

You ever stopped to think that your 'talking points' that I wouldnt discuss, were off topic? Hrmmmmmmmmmm.

Yeah, you are right. Me asking you who should drive the buses in a thread titled "Where were the buses?" is completely off topic. Then me asking you about the competence of the leadership in this country in a thread about leadership in this country screwing up was also off-topic. Why are you still posting?