Kula Meenur
Newbie
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2006
- Messages
- 5,748
- Reaction score
- 2
I'll give her a call.
/brbgettingmyfaceslapped
/brbgettingmyfaceslapped
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
whats that noise? Oh thats just the noise of /b/tards fapping
The parents had to pay for the operations? Must of been really expensive. If I was the father I'd of just been "You wanna be a girl, son? Cool! Go put on your mom's make up act really eccentric. You can pay for your own damn operations!"
The procedure ? carried out in secret and paid for by the German health service.
I would ask, "Why did you get rid of the penis?"What would u do if he tricked you into ****ing, and told you after. I would probably punch him dead in the face.
evil^milk said:Do transexuals feel pleasure?
Didn't see that coming from jolly ol' AsukaWhat would u do if he tricked you into ****ing, and told you after. I would probably punch him dead in the face.
What would u do if he tricked you into ****ing, and told you after. I would probably punch him dead in the face.
Sorry, next time I'll check, you just post such interesting pictures Krynn.
I don't think sex-change operations are quite the same as cosmetic surgery.while I support tax funded health-care services. I don't think cosmetic surgery should be covered, unless it's part of recovery from other accidents like burn-victims etc.
I said no such thing!
That being said... I'd probably* hit it.
*unnecessary.
I don't think sex-change operations are quite the same as cosmetic surgery.
I'd consider any surgery that isn't performed to fix/heal any actual injury/deformity to be cosmetic.
if he/she was born a hermaphrodite and had problems/pains urinating or similar and generally looking like a freak, then I wouldn't mind it.
but technically there was nothing physically wrong with the kids body that would warrant surgery...and I think definitely not for tax-payers money.
No. I don't think there is any real way for doctors to change the male reproduction system to be 100% female, including egg production and such. Being that way, NO PERIODS EITHER. Best of both ****ing worlds.
Well she was a girl with a penis, so she probably has problems with generally looking like a freak.
that's the gender her body is physically closest too.
.
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode]"that's the gender her mind is mentally closest too.
.[/FONT]
wrong. she was born a boy.
she might have thought of herself as a girl and in her own eyes seen it as a "deformity" but from an objective point of view absolutely nothing was wrong physically.
some girls are unhappy about their looks and view them as deformities, be it breasts, noses, fatty-ness etc. so are we going to pay for their nose-jobs, breast-implants and tummy-tucks as well? **** no.
I kinda feel wrong about thinking that she/he... "it" was hot.
Can you not read very well, or are you ignorant on purpose?
Yeah. I'm no fan of people saying 'holy shit, If I stuck my dick in that and I didn't know, I'd ****ing kill it' either, but news on the subject usually treats you like a five year old and dies on its own clich?s. All that russian doll 'trapped within the body of a man' crap gives the impression that transsexuals are mentally retarded, which generally fits with the diminutive tone of the report... and the question that if you had life changing surgery that would make even the usually placid Asuka punch you in the face, why the hell would you (or your parents, or your doctors?) go around telling the entire world what you've done, endangering you to levels far beyond the creepy 'I'd totally hit that' of the Internet?"wanted to be a woman from the age of two."
I can't stand it when people say tripe like that.
I don't take issue with the necessity in diagnosis that a person must have been subject to feelings of dysphoria from a young age, just its description in those lazy terms. It creates an overly simple language for what is a very complex problem, and falling back on common descriptions always has the effect of making it sound like those who use them haven't actually thought about their situation, or how to represent it to others.But isn't gender dysphoria usually described, even by medical professionals, as being 'trapped' in the 'wrong body', as being present since childhood, etc?
I'd say they should just stop altogether (what is the new element of transgenderism? it gets carbon-copy reported quarterly to remind us that it's there?) but I'm sure it's making some kid somewhere aware that they're not alone. Unless they're the completely un-media friendly comedy variation that is the girl who wants to be a boy. FtMs only get in the papers if they get pregnant apparently.I can't see what justice any such bulletin could do to it.