Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
First off, Republicans control the houses of congress so an impeachment could never happen. Second, Democrats are a bunch of pussies as Stern pointed out and would never touch such a hot issue because they are too afraid to take any political risk. They demonstrated this on the Iraq vote which was scheduled 2 days before mid-term elections.Pesmerga said:Then why isn't he being impeached?
CptStern said:no, I disagree with most people here ...there's a difference
no, I disagree with most people here ...there's a difference
Bout to say...ComradeBadger said:Topic guys.
About this Survey -
Survey Sponsor: American Research Group, Inc.
The American Research Group has been conducting national surveys of consumers since 1985.
Sample Size: 1,100 completed telephone interviews among a random sample of all adults age 18 and older living in telephone households in the continental United States.
Sample Dates: August 18-21, 2005
Margin of Error: ± 3 percentage points, 95% of the time, on questions where opinion is evenly split.
Question Wording:
How do you rate the condition of the national economy these days - would you say it is excellent, very good, good, bad, very bad, or terrible?
Do you think the national economy is getting better, staying the same, or getting worse?
Would you say that the national economy is in a recession, or not?
A year from now, do you expect the national economy to be better than it is today, the same as it is today, or worse than it is today?
How do you rate the condition of the financial situation in your household - would you say it is excellent, very good, good, bad, very bad, or terrible?
Do you think the financial situation in your household is getting better, staying the same, or getting worse?
A year from now, do you expect the financial situation in your household to be better than it is today, the same as it is today, or worse than it is today?
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling the economy?
Pesmerga said:I disagree with a lot of people...but I'm not so liberal with my mouth
CptStern said:hmmm I think you're mis-using that word ...I think you're saying I say what I please but you wont?
as long as you dont think you can get what you want, like that chocolate milk kid...Pesmerga said:I say what I want, but I used liberal as an adjective to annunciate your quantiful remarks
I didn't mean it like.... democratic liberal...
Pesmerga said:I say what I want, but I used liberal as an adjective to annunciate your quantiful remarks
CptStern said:actually if you look at the threads I've started the majority have nothing to do with war or the US
CptStern said:actually if you look at the threads I've started the majority have nothing to do with war or the US
seinfeldrules said:How about we look at your threads starting in the politics section, where such threads would be relevent.
http://www.halflife2.net/forums/search.php?searchid=471818&pp=25
I mean other than the gaming threads, its all US/Bush (mostly or all anti), War (directly related to US), or gay (again mostly referring to the US situation) stuff.
From page 3 on is a good example of that
http://www.halflife2.net/forums/search.php?searchid=471818&pp=25&page=3
CptStern said:? half are on gta jack thompson and so on
if I do the same for you
http://www.halflife2.net/forums/search.php?searchid=471828
100% is about iraq/bush/republicans
CptStern said:not the "media conspiracy" thing again :upstare: come on there's all types of new sources ..I think you have a problem with editorialising (example: fox"news" puts a republican/right wing slant to their news) not the media ..that's too general
.... of course the "media" influences my ideology ..but that's only a small part of it and I do try to read as many sources/viewpoints as possible ..although I admittedly refuse to read fox"news" or any of it's ilk ...they spread more disinformation than they do information and are absolutely unreliable as a legitimate news source ..I've tried but it's just too glaringly apparent
KoreBolteR said:i wouldnt be surprised if youve seen al-jazeera (hate murder terrorist recruitment news channel)
like i said, your entitled to your view, as i am of mine. youve changed my view slightly. but only slightly :hmph:
I would really love to hear what opposing viewpoints you read...but that's only a small part of it and I do try to read as many sources/viewpoints as possible
CptStern said:you frustrate me to no end ...first you go on and on about media bias then you do exactly the same thing ..al jazeera is not a terrorist recruitment channel
seinfeldrules said:I would really love to hear what opposing viewpoints you read.
Yes I do. I really am curious as to which sources you read that are opposite to democraticundgerground.com and commondreams.org.well for starters I've read everything you've thrown my way ...can you say the same?
ahahaha you really are an arrogant one stern. I'm just not a lemming like others on this board.and I dont believe for a second you read (in it's entirity) everything I post ..if you did you wouldnt continue to support the war
Well, what ones do you commonly read to counteract the other sites I mentioned?you name it I've read it at some point or other
seinfeldrules said:ahahaha you really are an arrogant one stern.
seinfeldrules said:I'm just not a lemming like others on this board.
seinfeldrules said:Well, what ones do you commonly read to counteract the other sites I mentioned?
So you are saying that you dont read from various sources. You read commondreams.org and those other sites and stick with that. You dont visit 'right' leaning sites commonly to hear the opposite perspective. I'm glad we got that confusion straightened out.what the hell are you talking about? who reads an article then digs up something that contradicts it? ...so for every article on how civilians are being blown up to kingdom come I'm supposed to find an article that says that the civilans in iraq are all peachy keen and everything is a-ok? ...I wonder if you meet up to your own standards
Only you and your followers would think that your opinion is fact.how am I being arrogant? because I post indisputable evidence? I didnt write the US declassified documents ..I just posted them
Only in your world.I cant begin to tell you how incredibly ironic that statement is ..you are the epitome of a lemming
seinfeldrules said:So you are saying that you dont read from various sources. You read commondreams.org and those other sites and stick with that. You dont visit 'right' leaning sites commonly to hear the opposite perspective. I'm glad we got that confusion straightened out.
seinfeldrules said:Only you and your followers would think that your opinion is fact.
seinfeldrules said:Only in your world.
did you not blindly follow your government into the crater that is now iraq?
......again what the hell are you talking about? I dont seek them out if that's what you're getting at, but if they're used as a counter to my argument I read it ...no actually I relish in exposing their right wing slant ...so yes I do read it ...which I'm sure is exactly what you do
..but that's only a small part of it and I do try to read as many sources/viewpoints as possible .