Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Holy f*ck.
It was an example you dick.
What about hunters, then? It's not their job, some kill for the "sport" of it. Not all of them are mental.
You missed the point of that post.
Neither me nor ANYBODY I know has ever killed anything larger than a ladybug FOR NO GOOD REASON.no it's not actually that unatural. that's why people are so freake out, they can see themsleves doing it.
Holy f*ck.
It was an example you dick.
What about hunters, then? It's not their job, some kill for the "sport" of it. Not all of them are mental.
You missed the point of that post.
What about hunters, then? It's not their job, some kill for the "sport" of it. Not all of them are mental.
QFTBecause it shows a lack of empathy. People who don't have empathy are fucked up and can't function in a society. You do have mental health problems if you are capable of doing this.
Sigh. So all life is equal eh? Guess what? It isn't. Killing a duck is completely different from killing an ant, you might as well have said 'skin cell'.
You can kill ants because you can't relate to them, they're way too far from what we recognize as living beings with feeling. Ducks are much closer to us in that regard, throw a rock at them (or stab them..) and they will show something which humans will recognize as fear and pain, they make sound, they're built much more like humans, they got 'cuteness'.
We humans base our empathy with things on how much we can relate to them, killing an ant is absolutely not equal to killing a duck.
If a duck doesn't trigger an empathy reaction, you were one fucked up little kid.
seriously what isnt crazy about a child stabbing to death a mother and it's chicks and then thinking there was NOTHING WRONG WITH IT?
I already said, clearly, I don't want to start something, I was just stating an opinion..
My main point was just because a kid kills something doesn't automatically mean they are mental. Vets euthanize (sp?) all kinds of dogs and cats and little bunnies, are vets mental? no.
There's a large difference between ants and ducks..
No there's not. Killing both "just for the **** of it" is messed and rude. If he killed either just for the sake of it then he should get in trouble.
However, it is not necessarily (and note that word) a "MENTAL HEALTH ISSUE!!!"
Seriously? If the kid went to his school with a shotgun and blew a ****ing duck to bits with it, you wouldn't have a problem with this?i would like to pose the question....
if he would have shot them with a shotgun... would it have been any differnt?
if so why? isnt killing killg? brutal:ie /w a pencil or not AS brutal:ie /w a shotgun... its all the same to me. props to the kid. the ducks must have been dumb as shit in the first place...
I laughed hard when I read that.6th grader stabs family of ducks to death with pencil
That makes him a dangerous psychopath, trying to cure him is like trying to cure homosexuality. It is currently impossible, he should be removed from society or someone will pay the price later on.
The kid is what 10, 11? To say that he is beyond help is just silly.That makes him a dangerous psychopath, trying to cure him is like trying to cure homosexuality. It is currently impossible, he should be removed from society or someone will pay the price later on.
Nope, it makes you a Replicant.Does a lack of remorse killing an animal make you mentally unstable?
Yes in fact I do. And one of the childhood indicators of psychopathy is cruelty to animals.Mate do you even know what psychopath actually means?
I think your attitude is ridiculous and an emotional reaction to the subject, it's a good thing you're not a judge!
Age is irrelevant, psychopathy cannot be cured, his desire to kill will remain no matter how much you treat him, you can try to suppress it, but eventually it will manifest itself. Thats because it's a born disorder, not a product of his surroundings. I'm not suggesting this as a punishment for the killing of the ducks, I''m suggesting it because he is beyond treatment and represents a treat to society, if left unchecked there is a high chance he will eventually resort to more killings.The kid is what 10, 11? To say that he is beyond help is just silly.
Yes in fact I do. And one of the childhood indicators of psychopathy is cruelty to animals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy
Age is irrelevant, psychopathy cannot be cured, his desire to kill will remain no matter how much you treat him, you can try to suppress it, but eventually it will manifest itself. Thats because it's a born disorder, not a product of his surroundings. I'm not suggesting this as a punishment for the killing of the ducks, I''m suggesting it because he is beyond treatment and represents a treat to society, if left unchecked there is a high chance he will eventually resort to more killings.
We all know it's okay to kill insects because they have too many legs.
And you wish to do what, lock him away in solitary where he cannot do any harm to others? Ever considered that he might not even REALISE that what he has done is wrong? How could you punish a boy for doing something he perceives as perfectly innocent and maintain your case against monsters.
And you wish to do what, lock him away in solitary where he cannot do any harm to others? Ever considered that he might not even REALISE that what he has done is wrong?
How could you punish a boy for doing something he perceives as perfectly innocent and maintain your case against monsters.
And I do not necessary want him to be locked(not licked, sry) up. Just sent away to a very remote place, like the arctic in a nice bungalow, with internet, hdtv. And I don't mind if my tax money pays for it, I do not fault him for being born a psychopath, in fact I feel sorry for him. But he is still a very real danger to society in my opinion, and he cannot be treated. So send him somewhere where he can do little harm.
(edit: sry pvtryan, when I was typing in my response yours wasn't allready up,
And that's why people like you don't make these type of decisions, because youd have a 10 year old's life shattered for killing some ducks.
Looks like you're the one who's got things twisted.
I'm more inclined to think someone who puts a duck on a human level has something wrong with them, rather than someone who groups ducks and ants as one in the category "non-human animal"No we should let mental psycho's like him who do not know the difference between ducks and ants make the decisions.
I'm more inclined to think someone who puts a duck on a human level has something wrong with them, rather than someone who groups ducks and ants as one in the category "non-human animal"
I don't see the difference, Killing an ant, then killing a duck...
Who decides what gets put higher on the list? "What living things are OK to kill, and which aren't?"