Majestic XII
Tank
- Joined
- May 18, 2003
- Messages
- 3,796
- Reaction score
- 1
I'm a real man, I have foreskin.
VERY interesting thread btw, great job! :shiftyeyes:
VERY interesting thread btw, great job! :shiftyeyes:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I prefer the image of unsheathing a lightsaber, replete with sound effects I might add.With foreskin, you get the lovely image of Darth Vader's head coming out of a blanket.
Who doesn't want that image when they look down?!
But then I am not from America and i believe 50% give or take of this forum is from Europe and a handful from Asia and the Oceanic.Are you circumcised?
You don't even have to answer in a post if you don't want to, but I'm interested to see is the statistics match up. Apparently there's a 75% prevalence of circumcision in America.
I was just stating the facts, you don't have therefore you don't know. To say a circ. sensitivity is fine is to be saying apples are better than oranges but never having tried oranges. Doesn't really mean that you're worse off, unless you had the pleasure of an orange and someone came and threw them all away and all you could have is apples.
Well the only thing that information tells me is that they're either masochists, or like the feeling of being able to hold back a lot easier (which I can kinda understand, considering it takes more effort being uncirc). But they're different aspects. Otherwise it doesn't make sense why excluding nerve endings makes something feel better aside from more easily obtained endurance.
Wikipedia said:Glans sensitivity
Masters and Johnson (1966) reported: "Routine neurologic testing for both exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination were conducted on the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the penile body, with particular attention directed toward the glans. No clinically significant difference could be established between the circumcised and the uncircumcised glans during these examinations." [1] In January 2007, The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) stated "The effect of circumcision on penile sensation or sexual satisfaction is unknown. Because the epithelium of a circumcised glans becomes cornified, and because some feel nerve over-stimulation leads to desensitization, many believe that the glans of a circumcised penis is less sensitive. Opinions differ about how this decreased sensitivity, which may result in prolonged time to orgasm, affects sexual satisfaction. An investigation of the exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination of the glans of circumcised and uncircumcised men found no difference on comparison. No valid evidence to date, however, supports the notion that being circumcised affects sexual sensation or satisfaction." [2]
Yang et al. (1998) concluded in their study into the innervation of the penile shaft and glans penis that: "The distinct pattern of innervation of the glans emphasizes the role of the glans as a sensory structure." [3]
In a survey of men circumcised as adults for medical (93%) or elective (7%) reasons, reported that adult circumcision appears to result in worsened erectile function (99% confidence), decreased penile sensitivity (92% confidence), no change in sexual activity (88% confidence) and improved satisfaction (96% confidence). [4] Of the men 50% reported benefits and 38% reported harm. Overall, 62% of men were satisfied with having been circumcised." Fink attributes the improved satisfication to the respondee's aesthetic considerations and to a resolution of previous painful conditions. Fink grouped decreased sensitivity with ejaculation taking longer than the men desired. Only one question relating to ejaculation time had a significant result; the question directly addressing sensitivity had no significant difference. There is conflicting evidence whether this should be seen as evidence of decreased sensitivity or simply of delayed ejaculation. A study by Paick et al failed to find a correlation between increased vibrational sensitivity and premature ejaculation. [5] Other studies [6] and several other groups they cited showed that ejaculation can be significantly delayed using a local anesthetic cream to numb the glans and penile shaft.
An examinination of 7 circumcised and 6 uncircumcised males found no difference in keratinization of the glans penis. [7] Bleustein et al. (2003) tested the sensitivity of the glans penis, and found no difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men, [8] confirming the earlier Masters and Johnson study. [1] Bleustein later followed up with a larger study, with the same finding. [9] These studies relied on laboratory tests of sensation thresholds to mechanical or thermal stimuli, rather than on subjective reports of sexual sensation.
Sorrells et al. (2007), in a study funded by NOCIRC, measured the fine-touch pressure thresholds of 91 circumcised and 68 uncircumcised, adult male volunteers, They reported "[the] glans of the uncircumcised men had significantly lower mean (sem) pressure thresholds than that of the circumcised men, at 0.161 (0.078) g (P = 0.040) when controlled for age, location of measurement, type of underwear worn, and ethnicity." [10] Waskett and Morris, however, on the basis of the unadjusted data, stated "we find no significant differences [...], consistent with previous findings." [11]
Payne et al. (2007), in a study of the glans and shaft sensitivity of twenty circumcised and twenty uncircumcised men, reported that "No differences in genital sensitivity were found between the uncircumcised and circumcised groups."[12]
Rollin it back, same thing. Feels shitloads worse.And you know, going on the same boat you were talking about earlier, you can't be saying it's such a world of difference when it comes to pleasure if you've never had yours removed.
Rollin it back, same thing. Feels shitloads worse.
lol, I'm way to tired to make any longer of a post. But that about summarizes it. But w/e, it doesn't really matter. Also didn't expect those poll results
Rollin it back, same thing. Feels shitloads worse.
THIS IS A POST EXPLAINING THE KAMEHAMEHA. IT ONLY WORKS IF YOU ARE UNCIRCUMCISED. SORRY.
Okay, so, you need a piss, right? Pretty every day thing. But you feel in the mood for something different, something exciting. Like... A KAMEHAMEHA!
A few warnings. This is possibly dangerous, and often messy.
So, you go to where you're going to piss (cubicle, partners mouth/chest, tree, roof of high building), and get your dick out. This doesn't work if you have an erect penis, by the way. What you do, is you stretch your foreskin up as much as you can over the head of your penis, and try to collect as much as possible.
Then you pinch it tight with two fingers. Then you start pissing.
In your head, or out loud, you go KA MEH... as your foreskin starts to fill with urine.
HA MEH... As it balloons outwards, stretching and hurting. But you keep a tight hold on your foreskin.
HAAAA!As you give a mighty push and release your foreskin, urine exploding outwards and spraying everywhere.
I don't know.Can the same be done with a vagina?
You wish you had a foreskin.Oh man this thread is getting intense, and I like it!
It's nice to know that the foreskin is as elastic as a latex balloon. I'll remember in emergency situations... like perhaps Zombie Armageddon.
It's nice to know that the foreskin is as elastic as a latex balloon.
I often wish I had a penis