A Poll About Circumcision.

Are You Circumcised?

  • Yes. I don't have any or much foreskin.

    Votes: 52 40.6%
  • No. I, in fact, have a foreskin.

    Votes: 76 59.4%

  • Total voters
    128
I'm a real man, I have foreskin.

VERY interesting thread btw, great job! :shiftyeyes:
 
With foreskin, you get the lovely image of Darth Vader's head coming out of a blanket.

Who doesn't want that image when they look down?!
I prefer the image of unsheathing a lightsaber, replete with sound effects I might add.
 
I never got circumsized, but I ate mine.
 
I'm not circumcized and I really don't understand why it's such an issue to some people.
 
Are you circumcised?

You don't even have to answer in a post if you don't want to, but I'm interested to see is the statistics match up. Apparently there's a 75% prevalence of circumcision in America.
But then I am not from America and i believe 50% give or take of this forum is from Europe and a handful from Asia and the Oceanic.

Circumsized anyway
 
I was just stating the facts, you don't have therefore you don't know. To say a circ. sensitivity is fine is to be saying apples are better than oranges but never having tried oranges. Doesn't really mean that you're worse off, unless you had the pleasure of an orange and someone came and threw them all away and all you could have is apples.

Well to be fair, I also go on some studies where men who have gotten it during adulthood say the pleasure experience is worsened after the circumcision, and some say it is heightened.

I guess it's not the same for all men. It's not a universal thing. Therefore I don't feel like I'm missing a whole lot.
 
Well the only thing that information tells me is that they're either masochists, or like the feeling of being able to hold back a lot easier (which I can kinda understand, considering it takes more effort being uncirc). But they're different aspects. Otherwise it doesn't make sense why excluding nerve endings makes something feel better aside from more easily obtained endurance.
 
Well the only thing that information tells me is that they're either masochists, or like the feeling of being able to hold back a lot easier (which I can kinda understand, considering it takes more effort being uncirc). But they're different aspects. Otherwise it doesn't make sense why excluding nerve endings makes something feel better aside from more easily obtained endurance.

To be honest... one of the main abilities to be able to hold back from ejaculation is by training the muscle that is used to also hold back urination.

And you know, going on the same boat you were talking about earlier, you can't be saying it's such a world of difference when it comes to pleasure if you've never had yours removed. The only people who can testify to such things are people who've had it done in adulthood.

And those people have conflicting reports, so it's very much on an individual level, and it's unfair to call them masochists. lol.

You act as if our penises don't operate well or it's somehow like grating sandpaper or something each time we stroke. It's not... each stroke feels pleasurable.


Wikipedia said:
Glans sensitivity

Masters and Johnson (1966) reported: "Routine neurologic testing for both exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination were conducted on the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the penile body, with particular attention directed toward the glans. No clinically significant difference could be established between the circumcised and the uncircumcised glans during these examinations." [1] In January 2007, The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) stated "The effect of circumcision on penile sensation or sexual satisfaction is unknown. Because the epithelium of a circumcised glans becomes cornified, and because some feel nerve over-stimulation leads to desensitization, many believe that the glans of a circumcised penis is less sensitive. Opinions differ about how this decreased sensitivity, which may result in prolonged time to orgasm, affects sexual satisfaction. An investigation of the exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination of the glans of circumcised and uncircumcised men found no difference on comparison. No valid evidence to date, however, supports the notion that being circumcised affects sexual sensation or satisfaction." [2]

Yang et al. (1998) concluded in their study into the innervation of the penile shaft and glans penis that: "The distinct pattern of innervation of the glans emphasizes the role of the glans as a sensory structure." [3]

In a survey of men circumcised as adults for medical (93%) or elective (7%) reasons, reported that adult circumcision appears to result in worsened erectile function (99% confidence), decreased penile sensitivity (92% confidence), no change in sexual activity (88% confidence) and improved satisfaction (96% confidence). [4] Of the men 50% reported benefits and 38% reported harm. Overall, 62% of men were satisfied with having been circumcised." Fink attributes the improved satisfication to the respondee's aesthetic considerations and to a resolution of previous painful conditions. Fink grouped decreased sensitivity with ejaculation taking longer than the men desired. Only one question relating to ejaculation time had a significant result; the question directly addressing sensitivity had no significant difference. There is conflicting evidence whether this should be seen as evidence of decreased sensitivity or simply of delayed ejaculation. A study by Paick et al failed to find a correlation between increased vibrational sensitivity and premature ejaculation. [5] Other studies [6] and several other groups they cited showed that ejaculation can be significantly delayed using a local anesthetic cream to numb the glans and penile shaft.

An examinination of 7 circumcised and 6 uncircumcised males found no difference in keratinization of the glans penis. [7] Bleustein et al. (2003) tested the sensitivity of the glans penis, and found no difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men, [8] confirming the earlier Masters and Johnson study. [1] Bleustein later followed up with a larger study, with the same finding. [9] These studies relied on laboratory tests of sensation thresholds to mechanical or thermal stimuli, rather than on subjective reports of sexual sensation.

Sorrells et al. (2007), in a study funded by NOCIRC, measured the fine-touch pressure thresholds of 91 circumcised and 68 uncircumcised, adult male volunteers, They reported "[the] glans of the uncircumcised men had significantly lower mean (sem) pressure thresholds than that of the circumcised men, at 0.161 (0.078) g (P = 0.040) when controlled for age, location of measurement, type of underwear worn, and ethnicity." [10] Waskett and Morris, however, on the basis of the unadjusted data, stated "we find no significant differences [...], consistent with previous findings." [11]

Payne et al. (2007), in a study of the glans and shaft sensitivity of twenty circumcised and twenty uncircumcised men, reported that "No differences in genital sensitivity were found between the uncircumcised and circumcised groups."[12]
 
And you know, going on the same boat you were talking about earlier, you can't be saying it's such a world of difference when it comes to pleasure if you've never had yours removed.
Rollin it back, same thing. Feels shitloads worse.
 
lol, I'm way to tired to make any longer of a post. But that about summarizes it. But w/e, it doesn't really matter. Also didn't expect those poll results o_O
 
lol, I'm way to tired to make any longer of a post. But that about summarizes it. But w/e, it doesn't really matter. Also didn't expect those poll results o_O

Most of the members of these members live outside the United States, so the results are not surprising.
 
Rollin it back, same thing. Feels shitloads worse.

So your assuming all of us that are circumsized are in pain when we masturbate or have sex? Yeah, uh-huh :thumbs: we cirumsized people just hate masturbation and sex, feels terrible, we're ****ing prudes.
 
It still makes no sense to say that you rolling back your foreskin is the same that is experienced in a circumcised man. That's ridiculous.
 
This argument is ****ing stupid and anyone who drags it out anymore is a twat. Your dick is perfectly ****ing normal and no one else has the right to judge you. Unless it's tiny then /nelson HA-HA
 
I'm circumcised, and I pushed my skin up so it was like I had a foreskin, but it wouldn't stay, so I taped it, and then I masturbated, and it wasn't pleasurable at all. You uncircumcised fellers have it tough.
 
I hope you're not one of these hooded freaks Pesh?

****ing Robed Wizards and their dickery!
 
I'm circumcised....and believe me, I've got nothing to complain about. Also, its semi-hilarious how its not even an issue that almost everyone here can post because they're male.
 
My penis looks damn sexy and there are several eye witnesses that will attest to that fact. I am uncut because that's what my father decided. I wouldn't have my penis any other way. Any woman who won't have sex with me because of a little skin is a ****ing whore and I'd jam it her eye socket so it ****ing blinds her for the rest of her life.
 
THIS IS A POST EXPLAINING THE KAMEHAMEHA. IT ONLY WORKS IF YOU ARE UNCIRCUMCISED. SORRY.

Okay, so, you need a piss, right? Pretty every day thing. But you feel in the mood for something different, something exciting. Like... A KAMEHAMEHA!

A few warnings. This is possibly dangerous, and often messy.

So, you go to where you're going to piss (cubicle, partners mouth/chest, tree, roof of high building), and get your dick out. This doesn't work if you have an erect penis, by the way. What you do, is you stretch your foreskin up as much as you can over the head of your penis, and try to collect as much as possible.

Then you pinch it tight with two fingers. Then you start pissing.

In your head, or out loud, you go KA MEH... as your foreskin starts to fill with urine.

HA MEH... As it balloons outwards, stretching and hurting. But you keep a tight hold on your foreskin.

HAAAA!As you give a mighty push and release your foreskin, urine exploding outwards and spraying everywhere.
 
THIS IS A POST EXPLAINING THE KAMEHAMEHA. IT ONLY WORKS IF YOU ARE UNCIRCUMCISED. SORRY.

Okay, so, you need a piss, right? Pretty every day thing. But you feel in the mood for something different, something exciting. Like... A KAMEHAMEHA!

A few warnings. This is possibly dangerous, and often messy.

So, you go to where you're going to piss (cubicle, partners mouth/chest, tree, roof of high building), and get your dick out. This doesn't work if you have an erect penis, by the way. What you do, is you stretch your foreskin up as much as you can over the head of your penis, and try to collect as much as possible.

Then you pinch it tight with two fingers. Then you start pissing.

In your head, or out loud, you go KA MEH... as your foreskin starts to fill with urine.

HA MEH... As it balloons outwards, stretching and hurting. But you keep a tight hold on your foreskin.

HAAAA!As you give a mighty push and release your foreskin, urine exploding outwards and spraying everywhere.

Oh man this thread is getting intense, and I like it!
 
It's nice to know that the foreskin is as elastic as a latex balloon. I'll remember in emergency situations... like perhaps Zombie Armageddon.
 
It's nice to know that the foreskin is as elastic as a latex balloon.

After receiving oral

"you gotta pull the skin back up"
"how?"
"just grab and pull"
*she ever so gently tries to massage it back up*
"just grab it and pull!"
"i dont wanna break it!"
 
No, my penis does not look like a pig in a blanket.
 
Sure you want to inflict pain. It's called penis-envy.
 
Kamehameha??

goku_kame.jpg
 
Back
Top