Darkside55
The Freeman
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2009
- Messages
- 12,083
- Reaction score
- 93
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Calm down, buddy. Someone didn't enjoy your comic. Take a deep breath, I know this might be hard for you to digest, but some people out there DO have taste in their humor. I know, shocking. How dare someone not like your webcomic?
Yeah...slight difference in difference in taste / opinion and just being an outright 'orrible git. I'm sure the creator has fans but he didn't get massive amounts of praise from the first page meaning you needed to balance the encouragement out. I'm glad you could be here to assist that process.Holy shit these comics are bad. You should feel bad for posting them, Blue Wolf, although we all know your posting standard so no chance there. But the rest of you, if you're reading them, and some of you in this thread are not only reading them but are enjoying them and are encouraging people to read past the first one, you're horrible people.
You know, any thread that involves Darkside ranting and Lefty spouting hilarious posts is a good thread to me.
I almost laughed at that last panel.
Nope, still not funny. Though some of the panels were almost half-decently posed this time.
These comics are awesome! (I just read all of them so far)
I'm glad you enjoyed it.
I didn't. It still wasn't funny. Which is usually my problem with most people's gmod-comics, since they're relatively easy to make.
I said "glad you enjoyed it" because you seemed to like it more than the others because it has "almost half-decent posing"
He didn't say his opinion overshadowed anyone else's. You did. You, so far, are yet another member who seems to think he/she can objectively prove their opinions.I said "glad you enjoyed it" because you seemed to like it more than the others because it has "almost half-decent posing"
By the way, humor is subjective. Some people will find my comic funny, and other won't. Your opinion does not overshadow everybody else's.
I just realized that junkie is arguing with someone who actually has made a good comic and isn't bragging about it. That person being AJ. It's too bad that that link is broken. It was a good comic.
But people like them
fixedcharJunkie said:I like them
Umm... layout.
That's my tip for improving. You really need to work on layout. I won't pretend to know the first bit about laying out panels for comic-strips, but what I can tell is that you yourself have a similar level of knowledge. I.e. little if any. Fine, the layout isn't overly complex, because a complex layout is hard to pull-off. But you've made a very elementary mistake in laying out many of these panels, and I'm surprised no-one has said anything.
There's lots of talk about the posing being bad, but that's irrelevant when you're resizing the images without maintaining their original aspect. You need to crop, not resize. I feel drunk when looking from frame to frame. Heads and bodies balloon outwards, then become stick thin for no reason. You need to work out your layout before you pose your scenes, not pose your scenes and butcher them to fit into the layout.
The aspect problem is more noticeable in the latest one because you're using different frame shapes and sizes (hence the constantly changing proportions of the character models), but as far as I can tell, it's been in since the beginning. Perhaps it's the high number of scout model shots (he's a strangely proportioned model after all), but he looks too squished.I would like to ask, are you referring to the layout I just used in my newest comic? Because in the older layout, every panel was the same size.
Thanks for the constructive criticism.
The aspect problem is more noticeable in the latest one because you're using different frame shapes and sizes (hence the constantly changing proportions of the character models), but as far as I can tell, it's been in since the beginning. Perhaps it's the high number of scout model shots (he's a strangely proportioned model after all), but he looks too squished.
edit: also, in the latest one I think you've got the conventional flow wrong. Where you have two smaller frames in one column next to a single larger frame, the action you're intending goes from the top of the left column, to the larger image (right column), to the bottom of the left column. The standard in western comics AFAIK is to arrange it so that you read down the left-hand columns, then the right.
What I mean is, I read frames 5, 6 and 7 and see the demoman go from standing ('Ah, false alarm') to passed-out to looking at the beer bottle ('Ah well, no harm dun'), when clearly the frame where he passes out is supposed to be the later of the three frames. Besides, the most important event of the three frames is surely the demoman passed out anyway, so I would have thought that should be in the larger, right-hand frame.
Stupid question, but do you actually read comic-books, or just webcomics? 99% of the time, comic books adhere to a set of established flow conventions but have generally more inspiring ways of arranging their images.
Sniper's knees are a bit wobbly on the 5th panel though.
>:3
Also there's no shadow for the spy's rope.
Laters