Biozeminade
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
- Messages
- 250
- Reaction score
- 0
Searched, didn't find a poll that asked this. I'm not gonna start a discussion, I just want to see the poll results.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
hmmm good point at 8 months its not really ummm..ethical.Neutrino said:Yes, I think it should be legal, but with certain restrictions in place. I think the idea of when human life really starts is pretty much arbitrary, but there of course has to be a limit somewhere. An abortion at 8 months would not be right to make an obvious example.
slicktick said:No I dont think it should be legal, that is unless it is very early and is endangering the mothers life, so that both baby and mother would die if you didnt have one. I believe it is life the moment of conception.
blahblahblah said:Yes, I'm going to post my unpopular views in this thread and loose all chance of passing my mid-term tommorow. Yay!
DoctorGordon said:What about all the sperm, they are part of 'life' yet they have to die.
DoctorGordon said:You should fail
That how I think it should be.Neutrino said:Yes, I think it should be legal, but with certain restrictions in place. I think the idea of when human life really starts is pretty much arbitrary, but there of course has to be a limit somewhere. An abortion at 8 months would not be right to make an obvious example.
qckbeam said:A bit touchy are we......sun-worshipper!
DoctorGordon said:No, he just really needs to rethink life.
Alientank said:Legal only if it risks the mothers life, or the mother was raped. If you're going to have sex, take the consequences that go with it, you know them going into it. It's not fair to the child.
Neutrino said:What about the situation in which the man's condom unknowningly breaks and the woman's birth control pills fail to work? It's happened.
AdoptionNeutrino said:What about the situation in which the man's condom unknowningly breaks and the woman's birth control pills fail to work? It's happened.
What about the baby's right to live? Should someone be free to kill you without government interference? I am against the government being into people's lives in the least, but in the case it isn't there to "restrict" the mother- it is there to protect the child.Lil' Timmy said:yes, it should be legal. such an intensely personal decision should be free of government interference in our society.
Shuzer said:Here's a thought..
Don't want the responsibility that follows sex? DON'T HAVE SEX.
It's such an insanely difficult concept to grasp, isn't it?
Where's the liberty of the child?AntiAnto said:Yes. One word: liberty
RakuraiTenjin said:Where's the liberty of the child?
RakuraiTenjin said:It'd be great if it could be fully illegal, but due to rape and such or if the mother is going to die, I guess it'd need to be allowed for those cases.
But the baby does have a right to live, anyone who denies this is a bit messed up in the head. The mother does have a choice- she chose to become pregnant, and she doesn't have to raise it, there is adoption. Anyone who aborts a baby who was not raped or is not in danger themselves from it is a sick individual.
//Edit: I voted for no before seeing the third option- so add a vote to number 3 and subtract one from 2. Either way two and three could sort of be combined.. sort of
See, personally I just find this train of thought disgusting and somewhat simply cold. Not insulting you personally or anything, or calling you a name, but that's just how it seems to me x.x I consider it a child. It's an unborn human.AntiAnto said:At this stage, the baby is not considered like a child... but more like a mass of cells.
AntiAnto said:EDIT: I see that a lot of people answered my question before I posted it. :dozey:
AntiAnto said:EDIT: I see that a lot of people answered my question before I posted it.:dozey: