Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Here . http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halflife2/index.htmlSaiboat said:Sorry, but where can I watch those interviews?
Saiboat said:Sorry, but where can I watch those interviews?
Kadayi Polokov said:So if you aren't referring to the beta, how exactly are you coming to your conclusions, what facts are you using? Please explain your means of deduction? I'll add in a few factual titbits for you to consider along the way as I have the beta as a reference:-
1) The beta has working AI.
2)The beta has working physics.
3)The beta contains a lot more than just the E3 levels.
4)There are pre E3 ingame screenshots that exist that show game levels that aren't contained in the beta.
Explain away :dozey:
Kadayi Polokov said:You've seen screens, where as I actually have the the beta? Whose in a better position to judge? The E3 levels in the beta are inconsistent with those show at E3 in certain respects and lack certain elements that are clearly in the movies. If you had the beta you would know that it clearly pre dates the E3 by some considerable time. The only one who 'lied' (to use such quaint infantile terminology) is ANON about what he had, the 'beta' should really be called the 'alpha' to give it a more accurate description.
It boggles my mind to think that people continue to believe the word of a guy who actually hacked Valve and maliciously released the actual game engine source code onto the net. I'm not referring to the 'beta' here (that came after), I'm referring to the proprietary engine code, which contains all of the programming work that Valve have put into the source engine.
Incidently, it's 'they are' or 'they're' not 'there'
The only one who 'lied' (to use such quaint infantile terminology)
You've seen screens, where as I actually have the the beta?
the 'beta' should really be called the 'alpha' to give it a more accurate description.
If you had the beta you would know that it clearly pre dates the E3 by some considerable time.
where as I actually have the the beta?
Non-Sequitur said:1] You call that crap in the beta working AI? It definitely doesn't live up to what Valve claimed it would do {Traptown... but let's not get into one of these arguments about scripting}
2) There were quite a few problems with the physics that would crash you to desktop... that would be unacceptable in the full version... I'm sure they would have still had problems with it in September. There was a guy from another game company (may have been from the Stalker team) who recently said they were working out some tough physics problems that Valve would be struggling with as well.
Non-Sequitur said:3} I doubt all of the levels were completed by September 30... and if they were, Valve is only holding the game back at so Steam is ready when they release it. Someone wants to make more money.
Non-Sequitur said:4} Great, but how did you come to the conclusion that all the levels were complete on Sept 30? If that isn't what you're insinuating, I'm not sure what we're arguing about.
mbrithoms said:Yadda Yadda Yadda
1. One word. STEAM 1.
2. Condition Zero.
3. HL2 was no where near finished, and definitely not up to the standard that the E3 videos promised.
Valve put one over us all.
End of discussion.
Non-Sequitur said:Yes, and if you think there are no genetic factors in weight gain... then you can join the ranks of "stupid people".
Non-Sequitur said:I'm sure they'll gladly take your money... they do need to survive. That's usually why people go to work. That's the driving force behind businesses. I'm sure if Gabe told everyone at Valve tomorrow that HL2 was going to be a charity game, and no money would be made after its release, no one would come back to work on it the next day. I assure you.
They're spending this much time on the game so their product is better than the competitors, so they get YOUR money. It sems to be a pretty good tactic, and hell, they've somehow fooled you into thinking they're doing it for "the greater good" or something...
Kadayi Polokov said:LOL, your answers show you haven't looked at the beta first hand, your simply tagging what you've read elsewhere. There is working AI on several levels, and I've yet to encounter crashing to desktop using the physics.
You doubt? Earlier on you were certain, now you doubt? Then you blame steam? Surely steam doesn't enter the equation if the game isn't complete in the first place? Seems like you don't really know whether your coming or going, with your arguments.
If the game was never ever going to be completed by the 30th, why would Valve give that date? And why would they maintain that date despite the fact they knew they were never going to make it ? What's the motive? Let's discount immature and naive theories about pissing off the 'HL² community' or the 'Fans' here, I want some solid reasoning here, prerferably that doesn't include the terms 'lied'. If you can formulate a bullet proof answer, then you've succeeded where countless others have failed. :dozey:
wonkers said:Um...Like I stated in my post there is now way a genetic factor results in a person gaining "super energy" from food. I just lost my patience, it's weak willed genetic blaming fat bastards who make me so angry.
Food in = energy out. extra energy = energy stored
If you mean that someone may have a genetic tendency to over eat you may be right. But if you think that they get overweight easier than anyone else your completly wrong. Life style life style life style. God damn fat people always looking for a way out.
I suck at math but do I blame someone else for it. NO
Non-Sequitur said:They weren't finished... they never were going to hit that date... and here we are in Feburary without the game. All I ever said was that neither Steam or HL2 were ready. THEY OBVIOUSLY WEREN'T. I don't know what you're trying to argue here?
Kadayi Polokov said:If they were never going to hit that date then why maintain it, when the product was never going to be ready? It really is no biggie for a games company to announce a delay, its expected, so what is the motive for not announcing it earlier in the year, if they were never ever going to hit the 30th? That is the question I asked before and you still haven't answered it.
.
Non-Sequitur said:I never claimed to know that... All I gave were reasons why it was delayed.
Kadayi Polokov said:Without an understanding of motive there is no reason, only assumption.
Non-Sequitur said:I have no idea why they stuck to that date, and I'm not even going to speculate...
Kadayi Polokov said:Why not? You must have some thoughts on the subject surely? Indulge us,
Justify your love :dozey:
Non-Sequitur said:Come on, what do you want me to say? Something about a deal with ATI or... what? :bonce:
Kadayi Polokov said:Personally I think it is all a matter of satisfaction. Valve maintained the shipping date well beyond the point by which you would normally announce a delay if the games completion wasn't going to hit the ETA. I'd say the game was complete, and the reason for the delay comes down to Valves dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the final product. They famously pulled the shipping of HL¹ back a year very late in it's development, they also pulled the release of CS:CZ because of the early criticisms by reviewers in order to get turtle studios to address it shortcomings. They have a clear history of putting the quality of the product before deadlines.
Non-Sequitur said:Then why the hell don't they just tell the community that? "We weren't satisfied with the quality of the product, so we decided to delay it until we're happy with it." I'd imagine that would have evoked a greater deal of positive responses than what is floating around now. As I mentioned before... look at the title of this thread. Heh.
Gabe just said... "It wasn't finished." And then media blackout.