America.....full of dangerous thinking people?

I must have had a bit too many beers, did i just see you claim Jews were superior because of the % of jews vs their contribution ratio compared to muslims :p?

That's...pretty much the gist of it.
Plus, I've never met a Jew who wasn't a top-notch person, and Jewish areas are always clean, tidy and prosperous.
My borough has slowly gotten more and more of a shithole over the years, but mysteriously the predominantly Jewish parts manage to stay clean and upmarket.
This trend is mirrored all over London - Muslim areas are shitholes, and Jewish areas are lovely. You can't ignore these trends.
 
You've made a claim, I've asked you for evidence to support it. It's not for me to find that evidence, it's for you to support your position. So far you've provided nothing. For something to be adjudged superior to something else, there has to exist some quantifiable means of measurement.

I never made a claim that any particular aspect of the Jewish way of life makes them superior. I said that they give a lot more to the world than Muslims do, and that is self-evident although I've already provided proof of that.
 
I never made a claim that any particular aspect of the Jewish way of life makes them superior. I said that they give a lot more to the world than Muslims do, and that is self-evident although I've already provided proof of that.

I'm sorry but am I right in thinking that your claiming racial superiority for the Jewish people because they have garnered a few more Nobel Peace Prizes than the Arabs? That a few Norwegian politicians selected them more often means they are naturally better as a people? That seems to be the gist of your evidence from what I've seen. By that rationale would you say the Jewish people are superior to the African nations as well?
 
I think Islamic people are superior. Simply they are braver and carry it out. You see them fight for what they believe it. They follow there religion however extreme it may be. Christians, Jews, and etc.. fail to follow there own religion and conform to modern ethics and thereby arn't as brave because they gave into something they disagree with.

See I can do it to!!!!!
 
Right, this is obviously getting progressively stupid, and borderline trollish.


Rapi, you're praising secularism. It's all you've done so far.

You've only established that religions "succeed" by compromising their religious beliefs. You're praising Christianity and Judaism for their failure as religions.
It's obvious you're not really talking about cultures, because "Jews" and "Christians" are not homogenous masses. They're both religious ideologies, that are divided into countless sects and groups, each of differing value based on their respective embraces of secularism. Any awfulness on their part is the direct result of decreased secularism and increased religiouslity, as you surely understand.

You're being facetious by ignoring the logical conclusion: the the qualities you praise have absolutely nothing to do with the religions except for proximity.
You're praising secularism, which has nothing to do with christianity or judaism, and are decrying religion, which is obviously the only thing those ideologies can be legitimately claimed to provide.

So, get your terminology straight and drop this "muslims are dirty people" bullshit. You haven't earned the right to be so unimaginatively "offensive."

It's a simple process: tell us exactly which exclusively christian (or jewish) traits cause technological progress.
Without that crucial detail, you're just spamming the same non-points to provoke reaction. Without any actual argument on your part, you aren't actually communicating anything.
 
I think unfortunately Creationists get bound up in the exactitudes of the Bible rather than the spirit in which it is written. There is no lesson to be derived or delivered from promoting the idea that the earth is 6000 years old to anyone.
 
How can you not follow the spirit of the bible when it's effectively written by the spirit?
And what is "the spirit of the bible" anyways?
The way people worship this character over all others, he must be a far more powerful ghost than Christ. :p

But really, the clear message is that christianity isn't obsolete.
The spirit of the bible, according to the bible, is that the bible is quite literal. If science disagrees, then science must be wrong. That's the spirit.

The spirit of the bible according to humanity is that it's a poetry book - basically, that the bible's spirit has somewhat of a mental handicap.
Thank goodness the bible tells us that humanity is not to be trusted!
 
In reference to the last page: Repiv and Stern you are both wrong and right.

YES the Americans are pricks for going to war and YES the Arabic countries are a waste of global space. It's not a case of goodies and baddies.
 
Back
Top