spamboo
Newbie
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2003
- Messages
- 150
- Reaction score
- 0
so it seems to me that alot, if not most, people like ATI's cards over nVidia's. but i was reading a pc gamer artical saying that nVidia's FX series had better image quality over ATI, at the sacrafice of a few FPS. But most of my friends say there is no quality differance and that ATI is just better. so eather pc gamers right and every one is just ATI's bitch (no offence i do realize that it is personal preferance, FPS vs. image quality). or pc gamer is just wrong and nVidia has made me their bitch with some stupid "we have better image quality" mumbo jumbo that they use to sell cards, 'cuz they cant match ATI's performence. i have a 256 FX5600 and i like it, i would jusy like to know if i got what i thought i payed for. better image quality but still fast FPS.