Ban the guns

A

ALEXDJ

Guest
This is about that minessota shooting,
as i see it, if there were no guns, there would be no shooting

i'm from russia, and kids are alot more violent there, but nobody shoots anybody in schools because, well there are no guns, what so ever. i'm sure if there were guns available then there would be a shooting every day, but there are simply no guns around

on the other hand, in america, everybody blames video games, movies, but nobody says anything about the guns, it's just unreal to me

are the people that dumb, that they can't see a problem as clear as that?
 
Ban the people. Guns don't kill people, rappers do. :D To be serious, the gun just fires when the person pulls the trigger. Under the accordance of our Constitution, we have a right to bear arms to protect ourselves. Some people abuse the law, and some people feel threatened in weird situations. You cannot make alligations like that if you don't actually live in America.
 
AFAIK he got one of the guns from his grandad, who was a police officer. Ban the police!!

EDIT: Really annoys me how hes suddenly nameless, its just "Another gunman" or "The latest shooting". People are forgetting about Jeff Weise as a person.
 
SimonomiS said:
AFAIK he got one of the guns from his grandad, who was a police officer. Ban the police!!

:naughty: Ban the Grandfather!
 
ray_MAN said:
Ban the people. Guns don't kill people, rappers do. :D To be serious, the gun just fires when the person pulls the trigger. Under the accordance of our Constitution, we have a right to bear arms to protect ourselves. Some people abuse the law, and some people feel threatened in weird situations. You cannot make alligations like that if you don't actually live in America.
i do actually live in America
 
ailevation said:
:naughty: Ban the Grandfather!
He got shot by the boy. :|
EDIT: Sorry about that. You said I'm from Russia, and I assumed. But, you know what they say about assumptions. Also, your avatar is a ****ing Communist flag, so what am I supposed to think?
 
SimonomiS said:
AFAIK he got one of the guns from his grandad, who was a police officer. Ban the police!!

EDIT: Really annoys me how hes suddenly nameless, its just "Another gunman" or "The latest shooting". People are forgetting about Jeff Weise as a person.

take away cops guns and show them a finger
 
ray_MAN said:
He got shot by the boy. :|

:naughty: Maybe I should have read the article before I posted!

Well, I guess in a way the Grandfather did get banned...
 
ailevation said:
:naughty: Maybe I should have read the article before I posted!

Well, I guess in a way the Grandfather did get banned...

Banned...Shot...I can see the similarity.
 
ray_MAN said:
Under the accordance of our Constitution QUOTE]

Constitution is not perfect and guns are bad, i'm willing to bet my life, that if you get rid of all the guns in US, the murder rate will drop down a lot.

but some people are making too much money on guns to get rid of them, so there welcome to the free world of guns and mass paranoia
 
because can you imagine a world where we all threw sticks and stones at each other????????????

guns dont kill people. its stupid mother ****ers with guns that kill people, and its THEM that should be shot
 
Pureball said:
because can you imagine a world where we all threw sticks and stones at each other????????????

guns dont kill people. its stupid mother ****ers with guns that kill people

"I dont know what World War 3 will be fought with, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein.

Probably remembered that wrong...
 
Pureball said:
because can you imagine a world where we all threw sticks and stones at each other????????????

guns dont kill people. its stupid mother ****ers with guns that kill people
yeah but if a stupid mother****ers didn't have guns they wouldn't be able to kill people (at least it wouldn't be as easy)

that kid could not have killed a single person if he didn't have a gun, see it is so obvios, i don't know why american people are so afraid of everything and think that guns can protect them, but you are actually killing each other, instead of protection

did all those guns save you from 911 attack? i didn't think so.
 
SimonomiS said:
"I dont know what World War 3 will be fought with, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein.

Probably remembered that wrong...

really smart if you think about it
 
ray_MAN said:
Ban the people. Guns don't kill people, rappers do. :D To be serious, the gun just fires when the person pulls the trigger. Under the accordance of our Constitution, we have a right to bear arms to protect ourselves. Some people abuse the law, and some people feel threatened in weird situations. You cannot make alligations like that if you don't actually live in America.

Protect yourself against what though? If it was a massive alien force, I could see most people giving the finger to a no gun law, and the authorities not caring.

But as it stands, how many people who own a gun actually have to deal with a threat on a day to day basis?

And all this philosophical thinking of how it's the person who does the killing, the gun is just the tool - take away the tool and what happens?

A gun makes it easy to kill someone. Sure, people who want to (or in their minds see it as they have to) kill others will find a way of doing it, but in a moment of madness, if the person couldn't find a gun to kill someone easily, then maybe they would reconsider....

I know it's all hypothetical, but in my eyes I think removing this need for protection with guns would be better for everyone
 
ALEXDJ said:
This is about that minessota shooting,
as i see it, if there were no guns, there would be no shooting

i'm from russia, and kids are alot more violent there, but nobody shoots anybody in schools because, well there are no guns, what so ever. i'm sure if there were guns available then there would be a shooting every day, but there are simply no guns around

on the other hand, in america, everybody blames video games, movies, but nobody says anything about the guns, it's just unreal to me

are the people that dumb, that they can't see a problem as clear as that?

If it isn't guns, it's knives, if not knives, it's sharp pencils, some dude at my school got stabbed in the arm with a sharp pen
 
Dalamari said:
If it isn't guns, it's knives, if not knives, it's sharp pencils, some dude at my school got stabbed in the arm with a sharp pen

Ban the pens!!
 
Murray_H said:
Protect yourself against what though? If it was a massive alien force, I could see most people giving the finger to a no gun law, and the authorities not caring.

But as it stands, how many people who own a gun actually have to deal with a threat on a day to day basis?

And all this philosophical thinking of how it's the person who does the killing, the gun is just the tool - take away the tool and what happens?

A gun makes it easy to kill someone. Sure, people who want to (or in their minds see it as they have to) kill others will find a way of doing it, but in a moment of madness, if the person couldn't find a gun to kill someone easily, then maybe they would reconsider....

I know it's all hypothetical, but in my eyes I think removing this need for protection with guns would be better for everyone

great point, 90% of murders are done under the impuls of rage
 
Dalamari said:
If it isn't guns, it's knives, if not knives, it's sharp pencils, some dude at my school got stabbed in the arm with a sharp pen

yeah, did he die?

and you can't kill 10 people with a pencils, not even a knive, that retiered cop - grandpa, would take that kid out right away if he had a knive or pencil,

come on people be reasonable when you post

think before you post
 
because guns were pretty much invented due to the wars in the first place. think back to cannons and gun powder in rifles in civil wars!. guns have simply been improved due to access to more materials, technology, theories and practicals.

guns are a way of defending yourself. im not against them, but i AM against them being in the wrong hands. they should be used to control situations and take lives IF AND WHEN NECESSARY. what would you do if a madman had a knife at your throat? let him gut you or have the police shoot him and you going back home to your wife???

think about it before you blame the guns themselves
 
ALEXDJ said:
yeah, did he die?

and you can't kill 10 people with a pencils, not even a knive, that retiered cop - grandpa, would take that kid out right away if he had a knive or pencil,

come on people be reasonable when you post

think before you post

So what, it isn't that he killed people, it's the amount? So one innocent person getting killed means nothing? And no, the kid didn't die but he bled on the handrails as he walked up the stairs to the nurse.
 
ALEXDJ said:
yeah, did he die?

and you can't kill 10 people with a pencils, not even a knive, that retiered cop - grandpa, would take that kid out right away if he had a knive or pencil,

come on people be reasonable when you post

think before you post

ahem....so its quantity over technique????!!!!
 
Dalamari said:
So what, it isn't that he killed people, it's the amount? So one innocent person getting killed means nothing? And no, the kid didn't die but he bled on the handrails as he walked up the stairs to the nurse.

killing one innocent person is bad, but it's better then laying down a dosen of people, so the kid bled on the handrails, big deal, i bled all over my bike, so what, it healed, but i didn't get shot
now think if that kid who stabbed that guy with his pencil, had a gun, well then he would probobly killed that guy

i'd rather get stabbed by a pencil then get shot and killed by a gun
 
Pureball said:
ahem....so its quantity over technique????!!!!

ahhh, yeah!

i'd rather see one guy stabbed to death, then 10 guys shot to death, wouldn't you?
 
mate no offence but you have a really ****ing shite attitude. you couldnt care that this kid bled to death??? how sick are you?

besides just because you get shot doesnt mean youre dead. its the damage the bullet does that kills you. if it goes through you, sure youll bleed like hell, but that doesnt mean youre dead. its the internal bleeding that kills you.

and anyway this kind of thing mostly happens in america...so that just shows how the country is so mucked up.

and anyway people in the US are ALLOWED BY LAW to carry a gun!!! lmao how ****ing stupid. what do they expect!!!! that everyone with a gun isnt going to shoot someone when they get mad??? ahahahahaha
 
This has been discussed to death. But yes, you're probably right, no guns=no shooting=fewer deaths.
 
*bing bing bing* our survey says!!!!!....

lol :E
 
I'm not saying that by removing guns there would be a drop in murders, but it isn't going to happen. You could kill people without guns, as some others have said. Since the beginning of time, there were weapons. They used to be rocks, now they are knives. Guns are merely a tool used by humans to kill. IT'S NOT THE GUN, IT'S THE PERSON.
(This thread is going to get closed. I can feel it.)
 
Not only has this been discussed into the ground, but it is a gross over-simplification of the issue.
 
Pureball said:
mate no offence but you have a really ****ing shite attitude. you couldnt care that this kid bled to death??? how sick are you?

besides just because you get shot doesnt mean youre dead. its the damage the bullet does that kills you. if it goes through you, sure youll bleed like hell, but that doesnt mean youre dead. its the internal bleeding that kills you.

and anyway this kind of thing mostly happens in america...so that just shows how the country is so mucked up.

and anyway people in the US are ALLOWED BY LAW to carry a gun!!! lmao how ****ing stupid. what do they expect!!!! that everyone with a gun isnt going to shoot someone when they get mad??? ahahahahaha

first of all he didn't bleed to death, second of all i didn't say it was fine, i just said that it's a lot better then death of 10 people

1 bleeding kid vs. 10 shot people

no gun at hand vs. a gun at hand

i rest my case
 
Direwolf said:
Not only has this been discussed into the ground, but it is a gross over-simplification of the issue.

simplification is a good thing

less guns - less gun murders
 
ray_MAN said:
I'm not saying that by removing guns there would be a drop in murders, but it isn't going to happen. You could kill people without guns, as some others have said. Since the beginning of time, there were weapons. They used to be rocks, now they are knives. Guns are merely a tool used by humans to kill. IT'S NOT THE GUN, IT'S THE PERSON.
(This thread is going to get closed. I can feel it.)

There are lot of more kills in countries with no gun control than with countries with guns banned. Yes, people are using other tools if guns are banned, but guns are the most efficent way to kill people, much more effective than knives or fists. If you ban guns and stop trade on the black market, you will notice a dramitic change in murder rates. If you don't I will eat my hat.
 
Just do what Chris Rock says, raise the price of bullets so damn high that nobody will want to shoot anyone for fear of wasting their ammo.
 
The_Monkey said:
There are lot of more kills in countries with no gun control than with countries with guns banned.

i don't know where you get your info. but US has the highest murder rate, and counties without gun control have less killings,

and i will help you eat your hat, but we wouldn't have to
 
The_Monkey said:
There are lot of more kills in countries with no gun control than with countries with guns banned. Yes, people are using other tools if guns are banned, but guns are the most efficent way to kill people, much more effective than knives or fists. If you ban guns and stop trade on the black market, you will notice a dramitic change in murder rates. If you don't I will eat my hat.
If guns get banned, don't you think people will find new tools, or possibly worse tools? Bombs are the most efficient way of killing people, by the way. :p ;)
 
Dalamari said:
Just do what Chris Rock says, raise the price of bullets so damn high that nobody will want to shoot anyone for fear of wasting their ammo.

i've seen that show, funny
 
ray_MAN said:
If guns get banned, don't you think people will find new tools, or possibly worse tools? Bombs are the most efficient way of killing people, by the way. :p ;)

bombs? are you for real?

drive by bombing, hahah

"I'll bomb your ass, mother****er!!!"

haha, what's the better personal tool for killing people than a gun?
laser? get real man
 
No, you get real. Let's go and drop a bomb on some city and let's see how many people die in that time compared to gun shots. And, we have no idea what could get more personal than a gun. We haven't banned guns yet.
 
Back
Top