Bush signs document effectively making Iraq a US colony.

clarky003

clarky003

Tank
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
6,123
Reaction score
1
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071126-11.html

Although of course the document doesn't say it, it might as well. The economic sphere agreements portray the country as if it is an extra addition to the states of America.

5. Facilitating and encouraging the flow of foreign investments to Iraq, especially American investments, to contribute to the reconstruction and rebuilding of Iraq.

8. Supporting the Republic of Iraq to obtain positive and preferential trading conditions for Iraq within the global marketplace including accession to the World Trade Organization and most favored nation status with the United States.
Click to expand...

Independence of Iraqi people.. nil, Bush administration and Iraqi puppet government.. one.
 
It's a shame there's nothing in Iraq except oil

Britain had the right idea when they took India (well, and everything else), and France with Indochina :p
 
The americans are 200-300 years late with this colony thing.
 
Way, Clarkies back! What batshit conspiracies have ye got this time?
 
Meh, there will be a civil war in due time. Got my rifle and I'm ready to join the rebels when it's time to go against the North American Union.
 
PortalStormzzzz said:
Meh, there will be a civil war in due time. Got my rifle and I'm ready to join the rebels when it's time to go against the North American Union.
Click to expand...

You don't want to go die with some rebels, lets go to my shack in the middle of no where and hide from the NAU. :naughty:
 
pr!us51.gif


That is the gayest looking snowflake flag ever.
 
Hiding is not an option.

Rebels are better, you sick perverted ****


And a snowflake flag? WTF does that have to do with anything? 51 stars?
 
1. Providing security assurances and commitments to the Republic of Iraq to deter foreign aggression against Iraq that violates its sovereignty and integrity of its territories, waters, or airspace.
Click to expand...

This is called "irony" ladies and gentlemen.
 
The US did the same thing with Germany in 46 no biggy omho
 
Irony? No, epic phailure

But, it's Bush. The fact that he still walks is an epic phailure to the Earth.
 
Why yes, I do. You can legally register it as a hunting rifle. Towards which many a tasty deer and rabbit have been caught and cooked.

To say it in a certain way, "The hunting center is required to remind you, that you will be baked, and then there will be dinner"

Ok, that play on Portal sucked, but screw it.
 
Meh, screw it. I got tired and had to type fast. For now on until I'm to lazy to press ctrl C & P, I will use |Censored|. The mods did get angry at me for using it so much:

Munro
Munro is offline
Halflife2.net Staff
Holder of the pointy stick

Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 5,670
Send a message via MSN to Munro
You have received a warning at Halflife2.net
Dear PortalStormzzzz,

You have received a warning at Halflife2.net.

Reason:
-------
Spam

You phail. I hate that word, please stop using it in nearly every post you make.
-------
Click to expand...
 
And how? What else would happen in a gun ban? most Americans love their guns. It doesn't go any further then that. You take away our guns, it's like taking out our eyes. Ain't going to happen without a fight.
 
I'll start by first saying that i'm as anti-iraq war as the next guy but I can see the other side because for better of for worse the rest of the world has given up on Iraq and basically said "We don't give a **** let them kill each other" So I would say this is a positive step because it puts actually humanitarian aid into Iraq instead of just more soldiers. And no matter how bad our goverments doing it we're trying to clean up the mess we made.
 
Iraq is a shit hole through and through. And a civilians with guns is completely unrelated to Iraq's affairs. If the civilian populace is armed, the gov might be a little hesitant to act like they won the place. We the people own the place, not the senate. They are suppose to represent us, now own us.
 
PortalStormzzzz said:
And how? What else would happen in a gun ban? most Americans love their guns. It doesn't go any further then that. You take away our guns, it's like taking out our eyes. Ain't going to happen without a fight.
Click to expand...

...excuse me, what? It states in the second amendment that a well regulated militia has the right to bear arms. It can still be decided by the individual states whether owning a firearm is allowed by law. Not to mention this has nothing, not even close, to anything related to the thread. You hijacked it with your baseless, sensationalist, ****ing retarded comments, and I regret that people even bother responding to you seriously.

Please, for everyone's sake, please stop throwing "NAU" around. You're inflicting serious stupidity upon everyone who reads your posts. You have no idea what you're talking about, you have no idea how to do your own research, and you have no ****ing idea how to spell and use punctuation correctly.

I sincerely hope you leave this forum. Not in a "lol what a troll, let's play with him!" kind of way. Just. Leave.
 
Ok, I got off topic. I'll end it.

It's not completely off topic though. It's still related to the Bush administration's crazy doings.

I'll stop using NAU too. I'll start again in 2010 though when it's a reality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_american_union

The final report proposed increased international cooperation between the nations of Canada, the United States, and Mexico, similar in some respects to that of the European Community that preceded the European Union. As this report states, "The Task Force's central recommendation is establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter."
Click to expand...

And what's bad about my spelling? I use firfox, so It corrects it for me... Usually.
 
Infraction for spam. He told you rightly to get back on topic; you said "yes sir" and then preceded to carry on what you were doing. If you must broadcast your silly theories, start a thread.
 
Sulkdodds said:
Infraction for spam. He told you rightly to get back on topic; you said "yes sir" and then preceded to carry on what you were doing. If you must broadcast your silly theories, start a thread.
Click to expand...

We're talking about Bush, What's off topic? Topic is on Bush's document singings. Is it spam to talk about the very subject at hand?
 
The subject at hand is not just "Bush's document singings" but Bush's specific document signings regarding trade in Iraq. It is very obviously about his conduct regarding the Iraq War and not about the Dire, Insidious, Evil North American Union or about banning guns or anything.

It's really very simple. In fact, it's all in the thread title.

I hope your next post in this thread will be on-topic and relevant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

CptStern
Dying Vet's letter to GW Bush and Dick Cheney
Replies
10
Views
4K
KoreBolteR
KoreBolteR
CptStern
UK classified document reveals oil motivation behind invasion of Iraq
Replies
26
Views
2K
Sulkdodds
Sulkdodds
K
Bin Laden and Julian Assange, False flag and living plant
Replies
20
Views
2K
CptStern
CptStern
unozero
US monthly toll in Iraq at lowest since invasion
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
unozero
unozero
CptStern
Like Iraq, US Intel on Iran Faulty
Replies
35
Views
2K
PortalStormzzzz
PortalStormzzzz
Back
Top