Conspiracy Films

D€vIL² · Feb 26, 2006

Ravioli · Feb 26, 2006

thanks, i will have spend some nights watching these!

15357 · Feb 26, 2006

WHY GOOGLE VIDEOS?

WHYYYYY?

("This is not available in your country because we are sadistic bastards. Signed, Google.")

Solaris · Feb 26, 2006

I watched a few of them.

Everybody watch Dark Secrets of Bohemian Grove, It' s a cult that loads of world leaders belong to, you can see them doing mock human sacrafices !!!!

Crispy · Feb 26, 2006

Just watched the first "Loose Change 911 Conspiracy". Pretty damning stuff.

Good find Demon. TY

Actually, I think I'll leave it at that for today. I'm feeling quite sickened by some of the stuff here.

clarky003 · Feb 26, 2006

Imo 911 eyewitness is actually the most interesting I recommend watching all of that, along with the Bohemian grove stuff.

Some_God · Feb 26, 2006

Devil, stop encouraging Solaris.

D€vIL² · Feb 26, 2006

clarky003 said:
Imo 911 eyewitness is actually the most interesting I recommend watching all of that, along with the Bohemian grove stuff.

Yeah, I think thats a good one. Its the most raw and you can see everything pretty much.

The Bohemien Grove stuff can be more understood if you all watch the Illuminati Videos. Then after all that watch "Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State" it covers everything because it was made by the same guy who recorded the Grove footage, Alex Jones.

The bush link is really interesting too. I watched that one last night. Real obvious stuff that Ive never known because of all the years of surpressing the truth.

Solaris · Feb 26, 2006

Alex Jones rocks.

D€vIL² · Feb 26, 2006

Yes, Alex jones FTW x2

Solaris · Feb 26, 2006

I'm not Alone!

Take that AL!

Therumblefish · Feb 26, 2006

huh???????

Pauly · Feb 26, 2006

Good post devil! Bohemian Grove you definetly want to see. (Bush and Sr. Bush are proud members along with many world leaders) 911eyewitnesses is good and make sure you check out Loosechange 2nd edition.

Angry Lawyer · Feb 26, 2006

Solaris said:
I'm not Alone!
Take that AL!

Don't make me unleash the Capitalist Scalar Waves.

-Angry Lawyer

RakuraiTenjin · Feb 26, 2006

Alex Jones is an idiot. The only thing he's useful for is grouping all the crazy people together with a label so you can more easily identify them.

DEATH eVADER · Feb 27, 2006

Thanks for the links, won't be looking at them til sometime tomorrow

baxter · Feb 27, 2006

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."

Carl Sagan

Angry Lawyer · Feb 27, 2006

Carl Sagan looks a bit like my awesome uncle/best mate. So does Uwe Boll, thinking about it.

-Angry Lawyer

DeusExMachina · Feb 27, 2006

lollerskates, Alex Jones.

Mechagodzilla · Feb 27, 2006

"Extraordinary claims require a blurry montage of pixelated images, leaps of logic, whiney-voiced narration and a mock-spooky soundtrack."

-The Internet

See, now what I don't get is why real researchers don't do this instead of writing those papers and things.
Why so scientists spend all that time writing and fact-checking when they could be synching their pirated Rage Against The Machine discography to jpegs of the pentagon exploding?

Edit: Lol, I wrote the above internet quote before I had watched any of the videos. In the second video, we get all four of criteria met within the first minute.

The first video didn't work for me.

2nd Video Description said:
Next to the work of Alex Jones, this is ranks up against the best of documentaries in the 9/11 Truth Movement
Written and Directed by Dylan Avery
1 hour long.
Take the Red Pill

LOL

baxter · Feb 27, 2006

Mechagodzilla said:
"Extraordinary claims require a blurry montage of pixelated images, leaps of logic, whiney-voiced narration and a mock-spooky soundtrack."

-The Internet

This is quoted just to reemphasise it.

clarky003 · Feb 27, 2006

Mech I hope you know your pathetic. You just cant seem to resist pointlessly slandering anything that even contemplates going outside of official media's compilation of event's. It occur's because there are unanswered question's, you do know FEMA and NIST's official explaination for WTC 7's collapse is .. 'they do not know' as one glaring example, so of course its going to encourage further investigation and analysis and that personally is what im interested in.

These video's arnt just on the 'internets' either. Alot where available on DVD beforehand, most are free, and Alex Jones is pretty awsome... I bet the people who slander him dont have the ball's to infiltrate bohemian grove and film what went on in side. It's quite clear that your not willing to sit and lisen to decent video's like 911 eyewitness which has alot of evidence to the contrary to contribute but inexplicably was never used as evidence.. when it clearly has extra video and sound evidence from Hoboken pier, and in origional DVD format its crystal clear and far from grainy.

So stop having a spasm (involuntary or otherwise) at anything thats contrary to what you believe in and watch the rest of the video's, if you can be bothered. People are perfectly entitled to be interested in this stuff, and dont really deserve to made fun of with fickle and superficial reasoning to discredit such as is in your quote.

Mechagodzilla · Feb 27, 2006

clarky003 said:
Mech I hope you know [you're] pathetic[. Y]ou just cant seem to resist pointlessly slandering anyone who even contemplates thinking outside of [the] official media's compilation of event.

I don't have "a pathetic", and I didn't know people were thinking inside a pathetic belonging to events compiled by the media.

These video [aren't] just on the internet[. A] lot [were] available on DVD [beforehand], most are free, and Alex Jones [rocks.] I bet the people who slander him do[n't] have the [balls] to infiltrate bohemian grove.

Click to expand...

I don't care what how many DVDs are owned by Jone's pet rock. These videos are just slickly edited excuses to for pseudoscientists to exploit people who don't know any better. I call them "Clarkies".

Do me a favor: summarize the "evidence" shown in all those videos, write it into a paper and then submit it to Scientific American or something.

It's quite clear that [you're] not willing to sit and [listen] to decent video ~~like 911 [E]yewitness, [which] has [a l]ot of evidence to the contrary to contribute but inexplicably was never used, and in origional DVD format its crystal clear and far from grainy.~~

Click to expand...

Wait, so 911 Eyewitness deliberately withholds evidence?!
I call conspiracy on you!

Now hold on, I want to get the end of Calm Like A Bomb to synch up with a gif of your avatar slowly zooming towards the camera.

So stop having a spasm (involuntary or otherwise) anytime people say or seem like they are interested in this stuff.

Click to expand...

I can't have a spasm. I already have "a pathetic" and "a not willing", so there's no room left.

baxter · Feb 27, 2006

You go down this road every single time, jumping on this anti- American , 1984, totalitarian state, whereby there is one Hugh conspiracy…but hey don’t even bother to offer up any prove, don’t even bother to wade through every fact , every single scientifically proven fact, just spout a heap of conjecture and pseudo intellect.

Proof it, plain and simple, no more shaky videos, no more half arsed ideas….just offer up, right now, prove.

clarky003 · Feb 27, 2006

I can't have a spasm. I already have "a pathetic" and "a not willing", so there's no room left.

So it induces a spasm then?

But seriously I can tell your being childish and have no real substance to what your saying when the whole point of your post was devoted to correcting my un edited draft post.

and what? how is it anti-american?. You always seem to assume its anti american, heck most New Yorker's who are American want the investigation re-opened so are they anti American?. So im anti-american because there are recorded explosion's going off atleast 9 or more seconds before the building's begin to collapse and then show characteristic's that totally disregard Newton's laws of gravity under the pancake theory, all the demolishion characteristic's are observed. Molten metal left in the basement remaining several week's after the collapses, WTC7 collapses in the same manner aswell, and to cap it off Silverstein himself even says they had it pulled. All the physical sign's for demolishion are there, yet the actual physical evidence for pancaking is practically non existant, consisting of a purely postulative situation that is assumed true in the FEMA and NIST report's.

But anyone can come back with the same retoric.. prove that pancaking induced by fire took place, because FEMA and NIST havn't even done that yet, they just postulated that was the case from the get go and stuck with it.

baxter · Feb 27, 2006

How is it anti americian?

You are at the very least speculating that the US Government participated in 9/11.

Believe me I object to US foreign policy, but for Christ sake, if you are going to condemn the US Government do it for a valid reason and not for some ridiculous, nonessential speculative rubbish regarding 9/11

This horse makes a laughing stock out of anybody who objects to US foreign policy.

I would gladly condemn The Bush administration, I would gladly believe the US approved, planned and carried out 9/11 but you have failed at every opportunity to PROVE this.

Simple................ PROVE it

Mechagodzilla · Feb 27, 2006

"But seriously I can tell your being childish and have no real substance to what your saying when the whole point of your post was devoted to correcting my un edited draft post."

myself said:
Do me a favor: summarize the "evidence" shown in all those videos, write it into a paper and then submit it to Scientific American or something.

Concentrate Clarky! Concentrate!

clarky003 · Feb 27, 2006

You are at the very least speculating that the US Government participated in 9/11.

Not atall.. youve jumped to that conclusion already, and Id like to know why, it could be anyone if its true, its the truth of the event that is the main concern.

It may be proved if they reopen the investigation, and thats down to the New Yorker's.

But like I said anyone can fall on the 'prove it' retoric with the pancake theory, it wasnt proven.. it was just assumed read it up yourself.. FEMA and NIST both go into varying detail but 'do not' prove pancaking occured simple as that. Also Admitting at multiple points that further investigation is needed, most predominantly to explain the molten steel in the basement that lasted so long and the no resistance freefall symmetrical collapses.

Concentrate Clarky! Concentrate!

, but I assume youve read FEMA's and NIST's official report's so you have all the 'evidence' you need.

Mechagodzilla · Feb 27, 2006

"Your reply not your first post."

myself said:
Do me a favor: summarize the "evidence" shown in all those videos, write it into a paper and then submit it to Scientific American or something.

Concentrate Clarky! Concentrate!

Mechagodzilla · Feb 27, 2006

Hey, you edited your post to appear less stupid!
CONSPIRACY 9/11 GEORGE BUSH CENSORSHIP!

You are dodging my question Clarky.
The question is why you refuse to submit what you claim to be airtight facts to a scientific journal.
Once they are peer-reviewed, I'll be able to ascertain their validity.

If the facts are airtight, you'll have saved the world! Why aren't you saving the world?
Could it be that you aren't concentrating hard enough?

Concentrate Clarky! Concentrate!

i z 3 r · Feb 27, 2006

There is no doubt in my mind that 911 was an inside job. If you just take a step back and look at the facts its ovious. But it did take me a while to realise the corruption right in front of my face.

The reason this happened:
Capitolism

There was a suspected 200 BILLION dollar INSIDER TRADING Scandal going on.

Now lets take another step back.
I'm going to put you in the shoes of a corperate executive.

Let me ask you this.

Would you rather get caught in this 200 BILLION dollar scandal and go to jail with bubba and his rubber ducky all your life?

Or would you rather all the evidence be destroyed at the cost of thousands of lives, and the world never knowing about it as you continue to roll in cash?

I'll let you answer that one.

orruption, the American government is becoming more and more soaked in it every day. And with everyday, the rights of man become more and more limited. The basic freedoms do state that we are free to speech, press, protest, petition and religion. But it never said that those freedoms could not be restricted upon. For years American politicians have found loopholes in our systems. For years these loopholes were ways that oppression could survive, and still continues to. It took the courageous protesters of the Civil Rights movement to end years of social oppression to the black race. If our government really stood for what it is suppose to then the Civil Rights movement would be null in history.

The 1st ammendmetn says we have freedoms of religon, speech, press, ect. But anywhere in there does it say thoes can't be limited upon?

This is only just one of many examples of the Hypocrisy that is our Democracy. The most pitiful thing is that so few people actually care. It is our own fault that we have allowed politicians and bureaucrats to take over the country. Because with every year the majority gets less and less involved with politics. Allowing them more breathing room to do whatever they please. Few know who their local representatives are. What good is a representative if they are not representing the people?

Top Secret · Feb 27, 2006

You know that 200 billion isn't that much anymore, right?

i z 3 r · Feb 27, 2006

But when it is in terms of insider trading and our economey... Yes it is alot.

Mechagodzilla · Feb 27, 2006

Wait, so you're actually claiming that 9/11 was an excuse to let some guy with white house ties get away with white-collar crimes?

Wouldn't it be much easier to simply not kill over 3000 people, and instead rig the jury or put a file in his cake or anything else that isn't utterly retarded?
Bribe the prison guard or hook his conjugal visit trailer to the underside of a helicopter and fly away?

Every conspiracy theory relies on an insidious force that is infinitely powerful and complex, yet still somehow stupid enough that even the dumbest person can comprehend it perfectly.

If you just take a step back and look at the facts its ovious:

Conspiracy is the new Religion!

i z 3 r · Feb 27, 2006

No its not a religon at all. If you look at the events of 911 critically you will see that there is NO possbile way the towers came down from planes.

http://69.28.73.17/commonsense/flight.jpg

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pentagon/spencer/sozen.pentagon.jpg

Also explain how the basement core of the WTC was molten?
http://cortez.gnn.tv/blogs/11271/9_11_WTC_Molten_Metal_Pics_Video

Yes i have, if you watch that whole movie above you will also see it, he uses examples. Search on google too, you'll find many. I'm not sure why i have too keep searching for people. If people have questions, research them yourself. That is all i wish people to learn from me, nothing more, nothing less.

Plane flies into Empire state building, no collapse: http://history1900s.about.com/library/misc/blempirecrash.htm
Madrid Skyscraper fire (worse than 9/11 fire), no collapse: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spain_fire_2005.html

http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/6.jpg
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/5.jpg

WHERE DID THE PLANE DEBRIS GO?!
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/11.jpg

http://members.shaw.ca/freedomsix/pics/pentagon-punchout.gif

Do the math

Mechagodzilla · Feb 27, 2006

You dodged my question too. Please try to focus.

The question is how a mass-murder conspiracy involving upwards of several hundred co-conspirators is in any way a smart plan for a simple prison break?

Answer that question, please.

I did the math and all I found was the "DANGER MEMO," published in defiance of the US's men in black who would cover up the TERUTH.

http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/7648/dangermemo2ks.png

http://skydancersworldwide.com/galle...arge/Alien.jpg
EDIT: http://www.buyskydancers.com/inflatables/images/AP_ALIEN.jpg

Obviously the contents of this memo are true, as no-one has disproved them yet.

Do the math
Take the red pill
Think outside the box
Believe in yourself
Trust your instincts
Go "4" it
Do the dew

OH NO OH JESUS THE ALIEN LINK IS BROKEN
THEY KNOW I'M HERE!

OH GOD HELP ME I SAID TOO MUCH

I ADDED A NEW ONE BECAUSE YOU CAN NEVER STOP THE TRUTH

i z 3 r · Feb 27, 2006

You seem to be very close minded.

The reason they did not want to go to trial or anything, they would run the risk of the PEOPLE knowing about it and them loosing all that money... Plus the blood trail lead back to the Bush administration and the entire government.

Pi Mu Rho · Feb 27, 2006

1) Did aeroplanes crash into the WTC towers?

2) On what other occasions has a similar event occurred to act as a comparison (and no, a smaller plane hitting the Empire State Building at low speed doesn't count)?

i z 3 r · Feb 27, 2006

The simple fact that no steel structure in hisotry collapsed because of fire. The planes do not even factor in. If they did, when the building started to collapse the other floors or other parts of the core would of temporally stoped the towers from comming all the way down.

Madrid Skyscraper fire (worse than 9/11 fire), no collapse: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spain_fire_2005.html

Pi Mu Rho · Feb 27, 2006

The planes do not even factor in.

Without another similar incident, where similar masses, fuel loads and velocities were involved in a collision with a similarly-structured building, you cannot dismiss the planes.

In a controlled demolition, the explosives have to be carefully placed and carefully timed in order to produce the desired effect. If not, then the demolition won't work correctly. With that in mind, how did the carefully-positioned explosive charges in the WTC towers survive the impact of two fuel-laden airliners travelling at high speed?

Conspiracy Films

Newbie

Microboner

Companion Cube

Party Escort Bot

Newbie

Tank

Newbie

Newbie

Party Escort Bot

Newbie

Party Escort Bot

Therumblefish

Guest

Tank

Newbie

Tank

Space Core

Newbie

Newbie

Tank

Tank

Newbie

Tank

Tank

Newbie

Tank

Newbie

Tank

Tank

Tank

Tank

i z 3 r

Guest

Spy

i z 3 r

Guest

Tank

i z 3 r

Guest

Tank

i z 3 r

Guest

ValveTime Admin | Enemy of fun

i z 3 r

Guest

ValveTime Admin | Enemy of fun

Similar threads