Eejit
The Freeman
- Joined
- May 19, 2004
- Messages
- 13,510
- Reaction score
- 219
what?
Yeah seemed pretty implausible to me too. Pat Kelley's brother doesn't even know how punching works.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
what?
Deus Ex did cyber-punk dystopia? It was pretty much just a near-future science fiction thriller story. Any cyberpunk in that game had simply filtered down through every major Sci-Fi film of the late 80s and early 90s. Take hacking: hardly Neuromancer, was it? John Connor did that whole 'stream of numbers' thing years before.I'd argue the cyberpunk dystopia in Invisible War is better than that of Deus Ex's. Yeah. It's true, and you All Know It.
Either way, though, I don't think cyberpunk has to necessarily be so pigeon-holed aesthetically as you're suggesting.
The Terminator was released in the same year (1984) as Neuromancer.Take hacking: hardly Neuromancer, was it? John Connor did that whole 'stream of numbers' thing years before.
Blue tech-noir is more Ridley Scott's Blade Runner or Spielbergs Minority Report...I always thought Deus Ex's setting was similar to James Cameron's work: everything is blue, cold, and dark (tech-noir). Plus, the entire game takes place at night. I think what we see in Human Revolution is the true dystopia, and events which lead the civilization into a collapse. It's a new world where people no fear of moral - they believe they are doing the right thing for the greater good.
John Connor was in Terminator 2. Hacking in Neuromancer wasn't a 'stream of numbers'. You misundermastood.The Terminator was released in the same year (1984) as Neuromancer.
no, no, it's their business to do what they want in the privacy of their own home *cuts deeper*
I still need to beat Deus Ex 2. The HUD and other factors just really put me off.
On how a prequel can look more technologically advanced than the first game...
"We released the first screenshots and people said, oh man - it's a prequel that's set twenty years before Deus Ex, and it looks more technologically advanced. Well the thing is that if you look at the computer screens or television screens in Deus Ex, then our real-world monitors are already bigger, flatter and of a higher resolution than that in the modern day.
"What do you do with that? Don't get me wrong we are doing this game for the fans and everything, but you can't just make it for the fans. It makes no sense. It's undebatable. It would be weird to make 4:3 ratio screens in the world, just because we want to fit in with the first one."
That was ****ING awesome. Now can we get some ingame footage?
This is very true...
I still need to beat Deus Ex 2. The HUD and other factors just really put me off.
Same thoughts I had. He also mentioned it was an FPS with RPG elements, instead of something like Fallout 3 which is an RPG with FPS elements...The leaked footage started off nice in the first video. Then everything after introducing the cinematic takedowns, the third-person cover/combat game, the endless camera switching, and the slow-mo action cutscenes kind of did it in for me. And Barret just sounded bad.
I can't saw I was surprised, although the takedowns were actually worse than I feared