f|uke
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2004
- Messages
- 2,669
- Reaction score
- 1
Actually its the 'drug providers' who are pushing for this legislation. As for paing the profs, its more a matter of finding the ones that agree with them and using them for their studies.Raziaar said:Yep, the US gov pays all these universities, who have professors who oppose the government, to make findings in favor of them over the drug providers.
Heres some proof that the government (specifically the Bush Administration) is speding US Tax dollars on anti-drug propiganda:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54651-2005Jan6.html
And there you go. Proof that the government is a biased lying machine.The Washington Post said:The prepackaged news pieces represent a fraction of the anti-drug messages distributed by the office, Riley said. Production and distribution of the video news releases cost about $155,000.
[..]
In one video, titled "Urging Parents to Get the Facts Straight on Teen Marijuana Use," news stations were provided a script for the news anchor. It reads: "Despite the fact that marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug among today's youth, many parents admit they're still not taking the drug seriously. Now, the nation's experts in health, education and safety have joined the Drug Czar to speak directly to parents about the very real risks of teen marijuana use. Mike Morris has more."
After interview snippets with John Walters, who heads the drug control policy office, and other experts, the story closes with the voiceover: "This is Mike Morris reporting."
In another, the announcer appears to be "reporting" on a news conference by drug control officials, when "in reality, they are just paid to say a script," Poling said. "In essence, they're actors."
[..]
"The critical element of covert propaganda is the concealment of the agency's role in sponsoring the materials," GAO wrote to Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), who requested the Jan. 4 report.
"It is illegal to use taxpayer dollars to influence public opinion surreptitiously," Waxman said yesterday. "Unfortunately, this is the second time in less than a year that GAO has caught the Bush administration violating a fundamental principle of open government."