oldagerocker
Newbie
- Joined
- May 24, 2004
- Messages
- 4,617
- Reaction score
- 0
So, GAME will be selling this one for £20. pfft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
DrDevin said:$25 for around 5 hours of gameplay? That does not sound like a very good deal. BFME is $20 here, so is NFSU:2 and many other games. Brand new PC games are $50 max. I've gotten many more hours of gameplay from other games then a simple expansion pack (and for the same price).
I will still end up buying this, just because of my love for HL2 and to see what episodic content is all about. However I do not consider this a good deal.
Pretty much EVERY FPS has mods of some form. Them being there is no excuse for a developer to cut corners on the final product nor does it justify outlandish prices (I'm not accusing Valve of either with HL2). They are a 3rd party thing though so a developer shouldnt release half a game and then say "heres 9 hours of the 20 that you were promised and you can wait 6 months for some mods by some fans to complete the experience for you and give you your moneys worth".h00x said:Valve knew there would be ALOT of mods coming out for half life 2 with the popularity of mods of half life so to me you buy half-life 2 valve give you hl2dm e.t.c and then think of the amount of other games you get in the basis of "free" mods.
alphadec said:Is I the only one who thinks 12 USD is a bit stiff for 6-8 hours gameplay. ?
When I buy a game a wanna have it.
Krynn72 said:Well, you'll be depressed to find out that its actually $20 in US currency.
I would have liked it cheaper, like $15, but then again... what would I do with 5 bucks? Probably buy a couple of sodas. So its no big deal for me.
No seeing as a ticket in a cinema to a 1 hour 20 minute film is about that price.alphadec said:Is I the only one who thinks 12 USD is a bit stiff for 6-8 hours gameplay?
Raziel-Jcd said:I seriously cant believe how cheap some people are... :/
The whole "such price should equal such amount of play time" argument just doesn't make sense whatsoever; even for a single player game. Here are a couple good reasons :
- First is because that's not how game are priced. I can take any 3 boxes out of my shelves with the same price (give or take a couple bucks), and have gotten 5 hours of game time from one, 10 out of another and above 50 out of the last.
- Also all people play a game differently, no two persons will ever get the same amount of play time out of a game, so getting any kind of objective measurement is quite futile (even for FPS games).
- Price isn't really indexed on replay value. If I were to pay a game based on the play time I would get out of it, there are some games I would have paid 3 bucks and others a couple grand or even more. (And that's only for single player games..)
- Finally, the price of software (much like any hi-tech good) is indexed on 4 things: the time & work initially required to design the good, the subsequent work required to develop every new copy, the physical material required for every new copy, and the margin the reseller can hope to add and still get away with. Because of the very nature of games and softwares the second two points are almost irrelevant, so the bottom line (especially in the case of an add-on) is that the editor puts out the price he wants. Only restraint is customers' habits & expectations in case of a new product; which is what happen here.
The only reason people argue about price vs playtime ratio is because of some weird buying habit they got from their previous 10 years or so of buying games. But episodic content is something new; new stuff = new rules, and new prices.
Bottom line is, as I said, there are no real rules for the price of a game. The published/developper only set a price they can think they can get away with and make money. Which is pretty much the case of any hi-tech good anyway. How do you think consoles are priced at launch?
They could double the length of the game by making your charachter move 1/2 as fast. Which means that the game would be twice as good!
By most comments it's not the price that people are really concerned with but how much game time you are getting for that price. 4 hours isnt even enough to last 2 sittings. Hell Blue shift was probably longer.DiSTuRbEd said:I'm amazed aswell, some real cheap-skates out in this world. Complain about it being $20 when they spend $50-60 on other games...right...
$20 is maybe quite a lot for 4 hours playing but not for playing Half-Life...Yellonet said:Am I the only one that thinks that $20 is quite a lot for 4 hours gaming? I mean that's one (1) afternoon.
st0lve said:20 bucks for some content I already got isn't worth buying, no matter if Epic, Valve or Gearbox made it (well Gearbox is an exeption, OP4 <3 ).
I didn't even like the HL2 story.
Raziel-Jcd said:Wow people are cheap. HL2M came FREE with HL2. You payed 50$ for HL2 not HL2 and HL2M all that is extra.
Valve should price HL2:EP1 20$ even without the Extra stuff.
LOL? I did i beat HL2 1st time in about 20 Hours Gameplay took 3 days. Oh and no im not bad at games iv been playing FPS games for 4 years. People jet through games, dont find all the secrets, dont find all the story clues. No i didnt load the game every 2 secs must have loaded a total of 6-8 times from having low health.
Raziel-Jcd said:I seriously cant believe how cheap some people are... :/
Seriously that whole "take your time to see everything" arguement is so baseless. The game was so linear that if you ran it with your eyes closed you will still see everything. It dose not take an extra 10 hours to do every little side thing in the game as there pretty much was no side rooms or anything to explore. I don't mind really, it was a great linear fps and I'll play farcry for a more non linear world, but please dont kid about saying that the game will take twice as long because of an abundance of secrets when there were none. I can almost guarantee you that those among us that beat this game in 12 hours or less saw just as much as those that played it in 20. I would account the extra time to people tackling gun fights differently and thus where some people may have a 20sec battle some people may make that fight 5 min due to varying tactics. Exploration....wasn't really any to be had in HL2 sorry.Raziel-Jcd said:Flamers of length read ^