GhostValkyrie
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2003
- Messages
- 2,319
- Reaction score
- 0
Kadayi Polokov said:In your wet dreams :dozey:
Don't offer opposition, Polokov.
Join me, and together we can rule the galazy!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Kadayi Polokov said:In your wet dreams :dozey:
Rofl, long term investments into fossil fuels, I'm sorry but I can't help chuckling when I hear thatlike I said, there intrested in the future prospects,. not the short term
and green bunny is totally correct. and if you cant see that , then get a pair of sheers!., to shave that wool away from your eyes
Using the Iraqis for what? Money? I still do not see how the American goverment gains money from freeing (feel free to exchange for whatever term you see fit) Iraq.They do, the americans are just using them.
The Mullinator said:If the U.S. really wanted more oil then why would they spend billions of dollars fighting a war when they could just use some sort of underhanded business tacticts to gain controll of other countries oil? Its stupid to think the U.S. invaded Iraq for the oil when if that was what they really wanted then they could have gotten the oil through much cheaper, and much easier means.
Yeah, and to (hopefully) turn them into Democracies.3. To scare other Arab countries into being more cooperative
Murray: I was saying they didn't invade for the oil.Oil = power
more Oil = more power
more power = more control
more control = more buisness
more buisness = more money
OIL = ENERGY = POWER
how can you say that it has nothing to do with oil, when its that simple. :dozey:
Instead of saying broad statements like "Bush lies" why don't you point it out? I'm not a fan of Bush on a lot of things, but I do support him on the war.obviously a bush fan, lol. man he really got to you with his speaches. (its not about terroisim, completely, it was a convieniant excuse) :laughs: you think hes telling the truth. the point is he lied about alot to get this war of his, and do you really want a government with liars and hidden agenda's..? he tried to make the American public feel self richous about something that was totally unjustified and power hungry, and its stopping the world moving into a new era. (which people really want, u know,,.. the one where there are no 3rd world countries that have massive differences between rich and poor)
Ok, so he isn't helping the world move forward by destroying the man who, still today, has hidden mass graves, still being found every day? He has (they found em like a week ago) which have complex mechanisms on the tip for mixing sarin gas mid flight. Those mechanisms couldn't be used for hardly anything else.he tried to make the American public feel self richous about something that was totally unjustified and power hungry, and its stopping the world moving into a new era. (which people really want, u know,,.. the one where there are no 3rd world countries that have massive differences between rich and poor)
I wasn't saying you were, sorry you inferred that. I was saying Saddam WAS a dictator, and there is almost absolute proof that he had weapons of mass destruction (see my post before about the sarin gas). It doesn't matter how many people die, it only matters that you're doing the right thing. We didn't do the right thing when Bush Sr. chose Saddam Hussein to lead Iraq, we chose the lesser of two evils and it has come back to haunt us. If we had done the right thing and turned Iraq into a democracy right then, and made them make a constitution that no one was above, this war would not be needed today.(im not suggesting a dictatorship just a better government, and a better world would be nice, but some people are too stuck into what there doing to even try. )
Heh, almost, it should be:' Bush administration working in Mcdonalds selling Whoppers'
Bush administration working in Mcdonalds selling Whoppers'
It doesn't matter how many people die, it only matters that you're doing the right thing. We didn't do the right thing when Bush Sr. chose Saddam Hussein to lead
The plain fact is that Saddam Hussein was a murderer. A MASS murderer, and we as a WORLD cannot allow one person to murder thousands upon thousands of people. It is our moral obligation to stop them and deliver justice to them. We cannot stand by and let the Iraqi people be oppressed by an evil tyrant like Saddam Hussein, one who kills anyone who opposes him, a man so hated he has over 10 body doubles due to the amount of people who hate him enough to kill him.
clarky003 said:Murray: I was saying they didn't invade for the oil.Oil really doesn't mean a thing and the fact is it is slowly being replaced by other fuel sources such as hydrogen for fuel cells. Why would Bush put forward over a billion $ for working with fuel cell's if he wanted to stay working with oil? If you read my post previously you would see my reasoning why they didn't invade for oil.Oil = power
more Oil = more power
more power = more control
more control = more buisness
more buisness = more money
OIL = ENERGY = POWER
how can you say that it has nothing to do with oil, when its that simple. :dozey:
originally posted by me
If the U.S. really wanted more oil then why would they spend billions of dollars fighting a war when they could just use some sort of underhanded business tacticts to gain controll of other countries oil? Its stupid to think the U.S. invaded Iraq for the oil when if that was what they really wanted then they could have gotten the oil through much cheaper, and much easier means.
GhostValkyrie said:Don't offer opposition, Polokov.
Join me, and together we can rule the galazy!
MaxiKana said:No, the reason was for bush to secure a second season in the whitehouse, they wen't to war because they wanted to give the people a false sense of security and also show that they have power, and to get voters.
Kadayi Polokov said:Like sauron I don't share (Plus you might have kooties)