Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
2D games generally age better than 3D ones, and that's a fact.
Splinter Cell:
*snip*
Therefore we should really compare the first 2D games to the first 3D games if we want to be fair.
It's true, but it's also interesting to see how at the time, people both buying and selling the games believed that because something was 3D it was superior and more realistic. Hindsight often says differently.The problem is that we're comparing 2D and 3D games on the same chronological timescale. E.g. we're saying that a 2D game which came out in 1998 is comparable to a 3D game that came out in 1998.
I think it has to be said... You must be the only person in the world still calling it that I actually think that FFVI is kind of ugly among SNES titles (Yoshi's Island is a god). Final Fantasy is an interesting case in point, since FFVII did the splits on the stairs of visual advance. The 3D characters were pretty much a 'me too!' exercise in ugliness, but the Playstation, the 3D poster-child actually gave the series the best advance in 2D Backgrounds. I don't know what to make of FFVII's FMVs, because they look absolutely awful but have major storytelling advances for the series. In all, I think between those two games, you have a lot of movement that doesn't really result in any actual progress. They're both ugly.Final Fantasy III
snip
The more sophisticated media becomes the more discerning and desensitized to it we become over time. It's the same with special effects in films. One of the first big CGI effects in a film was the water tentacle in The Abyss and that scene pretty much blew peoples minds, but now you look at it and it's so blatantly CG it doesn't impress so much.
Black and White. Thought it looked like sex. Yeah, not so much now.
God how true, I remember just gawking at the *gasp* REFLECTIVE!!! water, and at the amazing detail on the 3d environments when it looked like this:
Rome: Total War. I thought it looked really awesome back in the day, and though it's still alright today, wasn't as wtfbbq.
Well, I think both those games aged pretty well.
Don't hate me for this but...
I prefer gameplay over graffics.
Homeworld? Naaaah. Very high in the visual fidelity thing, that game. Has to do with all the boxes.
God how true, I remember just gawking at the *gasp* REFLECTIVE!!! water, and at the amazing detail on the 3d environments when it looked like this:
It's worth pointing out that the screenshot is one of the earliest of the early ones that was sent out before the E3 videos that everyone actually remembers (note Combat-Suit Alyx), and they are still pretty sexy.thought this was badass when it first came...but now its horrible. Low-Poly characters, low res textures, weird lightning, the ground looks weird (pointy) the background is horrible. The hand+gun looks terrible <snip>
Really? I always thought Tribes 2 looked fairly unexciting, though the basic sense of 'OMG, big areas!' was quite exciting back in the day.Tribes 2 was probably the best looking MP game out there 8 years ago, not any more.
Still looks good but not that much.
Really? I always thought Tribes 2 looked fairly unexciting, though the basic sense of 'OMG, big areas!' was quite exciting back in the day.
A game I never played too much tbh. Kind of regret it. My net connection sucked back in the day, and by the time I was going faster, Tribes 2 had kind of died...
Actually, Red Faction wouldn't look so bad if not for the now extremely low-poly character/object models. The environmental surface textures still look pretty good imo. :| I wonder if the PC version of Red Faction has a HDR/Hi-res mod pack? (I've only played it on PS2) That's all Red Faction would need in the way of a visual face-lift besides higher res character models. Is there a mod for that too though however?Red faction