Yakuza
Newbie
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
- Messages
- 769
- Reaction score
- 0
Mac said:what does that have to do with my post?
or did you meant to hit the 'other' reply button?
LOL sorry Mac
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Mac said:what does that have to do with my post?
or did you meant to hit the 'other' reply button?
I agree completely. I'm just getting fed up with the "OMG!!!1!! FAR CRY ISS TEH BESTEST GAM EVAH!!!1!!!!!!!" crowd. It's a good game, but it's not that good.Apos said:Far Cry is a good solid FPS, and good FPSes should get support from gamers like us.
Cujo said:If Far Cry would be just "eye candy mediocre $hit" it wouldn't get such high notes on gaming sites. I didn't saw anything below 90% note anywhere.
I know this is rather missed purpose to post such topics here on HL2 board cuz it's filled with (no offense intended) fanboys. However Far Cry IS revolutionary game both technically and in whole prospectum and there is no need to say it isn't. It's easiest to lie yourself.
SMT said:Meh. Far Cry is okay, but it's no gaming messiah IMHO. It has a rather mediocre physics implementation, I think. I've really enjoyed the game up until now, but after a while it got to be like "Oh look, hooray. More crawling through bushes and ambushing islands from a boat. Three cheers for repetitive gameplay." I imagine I'll finish it sooner or later.
The Crytek engine does a great job of rendering long distances with aggressive LOD, but they really overdo the specular map on absolutely everything. And the models move rather stiffly, a problem which Half-Life 2 does not seem to have. I'm looking forward to a time when game designers really begin to use shaders in a more subtle, unobtrusive way to actually pull off graphic effects with finesse.
First off, i doubt Valve are drooling over that game, but im pretty sure they've got more up their sleeve then anything Far Cry has to offer. Because, for a start, this is probably the first game that actually matches the same level of co-operative AI in Half-Life, which is 6 years old. Im sure Valve have better'd their AI since SIX YEARS AGOCaminante said:huh? I can't help it but laugh at such ridiculous statement, from such "ungreatful" - if you will - person. Who obviously lacks good old common sence as well as any artistic skill.
FarCry is trully a master piece from it's AI to it's physics engine period, you would have to be either blind or utterly dumb not to realise this. I'm pretty sure that Valve is currently drolling over this game right now. All that talk about "LOD", "specular mapping" and so on, would have sound more believable, if you knew what you are talking about.
Do yourself a favor and don't compare a game that is already out against another that isn't. It will just make you look silly. Sorry, but that to me is fanboy talk.
Caminante said:huh? I can't help it but laugh at such ridiculous statement, from such "ungreatful" - if you will - person. Who obviously lacks good old common sence as well as any artistic skill.
FarCry is trully a master piece from it's AI to it's physics engine period, you would have to be either blind or utterly dumb not to realise this.
but that to me is fanboy talk.
Sparta said:First off, i doubt Valve are drooling over that game, but im pretty sure they've got more up their sleeve then anything Far Cry has to offer. Because, for a start, this is probably the first game that actually matches the same level of co-operative AI in Half-Life, which is 6 years old. Im sure Valve have better'd their AI since SIX YEARS AGO
And before you say "I dont own the game so i wouldn't know". I do and i've finished it and i know what im talking about.
Second of all, i suggest you dont go calling him a Fan-boy dude, you sound like the biggest hypocrite from what you've just said calling Far Cry a masterpiece and calling him an idiot for not realising it. And i totally argee with SMT, there is WAY too much specularity in that game
Sparta said:Second of all, i suggest you dont go calling him a Fan-boy dude, you sound like the biggest hypocrite from what you've just said calling Far Cry a masterpiece and calling him an idiot for not realising it.
Sparta said:And before you say "I dont own the game so i wouldn't know". I do and i've finished it and i know what im talking about.
Excuse me? Read belowCaminante said:By the way, i never called him directly either an idiot nor dumb, please do not make stuff up.
You didn't call him DIRECTLY dumb but you still implied that he is stupid because he doesnt agree with youCaminante said:FarCry is trully a master piece from it's AI to it's physics engine period, you would have to be either blind or utterly dumb not to realise this
Wow, grass can be truly amazing when put next to shiny pipes and metal. You've got me there......Also i find that UT 2004 is alot more fun then Far Cry. Again, Far Cry's a great game, but i disagree with you thereCaminate said:FarCry is indeed the best game out there right now, from the obvious graphical eye-candy to all the flora and fauna found throughout the game.
Sparta said:Don't get me wrong, Far Cry's an awesome game, but there is nothing revolutionary about it, except that its the prettiest Direct X 9 game currently out. Thats it, other then that, there's nothing in the game that hasn't been done before
Alig said:FarCry *is* the best fps out there period, for it to be the best that means its revolutionary....HL1 is the second best fps out there...there is no other fps that comes in a close 3rd because all the rest sucked.
HL2 probably has more up its sleeve but then again, Crytek did'nt have the backing of one of the best selling games to fund them which Valve have already said "They put it all back into making HL2" and have already hypothetically said "We will not hesitate to delay the game till 2005 and put an extra 20million into it" ...so yeah HL2 probably will be better than FC in many ways but HL2 isnt out and FC is and FC currently holds the fps crown in all glory's except story.
Mac said:nothing touches FarCry right now. but in the near future, farcry will no longer be 'revolutionary'
Sparta said:Excuse me? Read below
You didn't call him DIRECTLY dumb but you still implied that he is stupid because he doesnt agree with you
I'm the fanboy? I was more impressed by the strider video then everything i PLAYED in Far Cry. Oh and im not the Fanboy dude, at least not as much as you are. Read below
Wow, grass can be truly amazing when put next to shiny pipes and metal. You've got me there......Also i find that UT 2004 is alot more fun then Far Cry. Again, Far Cry's a great game, but i disagree with you there
And everything i've played in Far Cry and everything i've seen in HL2 tells me that HL2 looks like it has more going for it.
Crusader said:In every one of these type of threads I have had to express my pity for people who believe Far Cry Vs HL2 is even worth consideration. I have just been playing Far-Cry, and it's hardly anything special even compared to games that are already out, never mind HL2..
The water is about the prettiest thing in the game, and it's nowhere near as good as HL2 in that respect either.
That's not to say Far-Cry isn't a great game, it's just that HL2 is totally out of its league, so all these Far-Cry threads are turning me insane...
crabcakes66 said:Im sorry but it never was revolutionary.
hl2 d3 and stalker are revolutionary
farcry is just an intermittent step
Alig said:Want to explain to me what hl2/doom3/stalker have over farcry in detail? how can games that are'nt even out/have next to no media be revolutionary? When farcry has absolutely everything them 3 games has except the story i admit that. Your just to into this whole hl2 > anything thrown at it and yes im going to love hl2 but i still make sure there is room for other 'good' games, you can argue the toss that hl2 has better AI/graphics/physics but the problem is hl2 isnt even out to compare.
crabcakes66 said:Im sorry but that is just not a very good arguement.
You tell me im caught up in hl2(i am) when i mention all 3 truly next-gen games? Please.
I have already said what i dislike about farcry......several times.
Basicaly your whole argument is that anyone who doesnt think farcry is the best game ever is a blind fanboy of some other game.
Grow up.
Alig said:No, open your eyes and tell me why farcry is normal.
Alig said:No, open your eyes and tell me why farcry is normal.
Doom had it...Sparta said:Damn straight. Gibbing's only eye candy, no effect on the gameplay whatsoever, same with rag-doll. However, since we've had gibbing in games as far back as.....Quake (were there any earlier games with it?) i think im much happier with HL2's cool-ass physics system then the gibs from the original game
crabcakes66 said:welcome to my ignore list :thumbs:
It may be the best new FPS currently on the market, but that's still quite a long ways from "revolutionary".Alig said:FarCry *is* the best fps out there period, for it to be the best that means its revolutionary...
Alig said:Dont make an arguement if you dont have any answers to back yourself up, fool.
EDIT: Dont get me wrong, im not saying farcry is a bad fps, it's good. Just saying for me, there are more important points, like the plot and inmersion. (HL1's plot is way better and Call of duty or MOH: allied asault more inmersive imo.EvilInside said:This is my opinion but id say the best fps isnt necesary the one with the best graphics. If the plot is weak(and Farcry's is) it will keep me away from it. I expect HL2 have a strong plot as well.
Alig said:FarCry *is* the best fps out there period, for it to be the best that means its revolutionary....