Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Please at least tell me you gave her a scathing response in reply.
qftCole said:Atheism is often applied to, (weak atheist)"the lack of belief in a god" or (strong atheist)"the belief a god does not exist". Those definitions are different. For example you were a weak atheist at one time in your life. When you were born and you could barely think, you had no idea what god was. The thought never even crossed your mind. You did not believe he did or didn't exist. You lacked any belief in that god. So you were a weak atheist.
But yes, thats all Atheism covers. Those 2 definitions. Nothing more. Nothing less. What happens after death is up to the person. Beliving in evolution, gravity, quantum mechanics, etc.. is all up to the person. Hell believing that 1 + 1 = 2 is up to the person. Atheism does not say you believe in evolution, it doesn't say much about you.
That's sad; be good just to be good.
He fails cause his jokes suck. bill hicks is so much better:Imo, fairly funny atheist skit by Dane Cook, the atheist joke is about half-way in... before that it's all backstory.
Edit : He fails by thinking the space bar is the enter button.
Sorry but this is probably the most ridiculous and discriminative post in this thread. Sure religion has caused plenty of war, but it has kept people alive and given people a higher purpose. Some have made huge differences in the world from their religious faiths (gandhi, mother teresa). Im not saying I agree with them totally but they've done alot more for this world than any of us. Ofcourse there are people who twist it to their own ends, but thats so with any ideology...If you want to live in delusion, you have all right to do so! No one should stop you. But living in a delusion which tells you to condemn, hate, discriminate and kill people is no longer a delusion...its a Psychic Disease, Schizofrenia, Mental Disturbance and it becomes a threat to others, you should immediately seek a mental hospital. This kind of delusion is called Religion, which has poisoned billions of innocent people across the globe
He fails cause his jokes suck. bill hicks is so much better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qmglGWMsdk
Ravoli,
Sorry but this is probably the most ridiculous and discriminative post in this thread. Sure religion has caused plenty of war, but it has kept people alive and given people a higher purpose. Some have made huge differences in the world from their religious faiths (gandhi, mother teresa). Im not saying I agree with them totally but they've done alot more for this world than any of us. Ofcourse there are people who twist it to their own ends, but thats so with any ideology...
Ofcorse, i totaly agree with you. But that was the past
What do you mean? What was in the past? It effects people in a very positive way everyday.
i think we have life "outside" of this one, that is less singular, doesnt have the notions we have about existance, like time. energy never dissipates, makes sense that consciousness incorporates energy. my life feels more like a choice than an accident
read my post again, it got half-cut off
Some have made huge differences in the world from their religious faiths (gandhi, mother teresa). Im not saying I agree with them totally but they've done alot more for this world than any of us. Ofcourse there are people who twist it to their own ends, but thats so with any ideology...
Im not talking about the people who recieve the charity... Im asking the question from the personal perspective of both the theist and non theist and how the perceive their actions.[Matt], neither are more moral. Charity is charity, the receivers don't give a shit why you do it.
But charity is just hurting people unless it helps them become more independent.
Another thing to add to the debate on morality and how religion gets in the way. Which of these actions is more moral and whats the defining difference between the two that you can describe in one word only?
A theist gives away half his possessions to charity to be good and to gain entry into heaven as he believes.
A non believer gives away half of his possessions to charity to be good and for his own well bieng as by doing so he feels better for it.
Interesting... I'm often told by those who know of my personal belief system, that I'm selfish for not believing in a higher power. Somehow, I'm living my life for myself, and not on behalf of another.
Giving away possessions in the hope of "making it" into another realm (or whatever you may call it) seems like a lifetime spent in the worst popularity contest ever. No thanks. I'm out.
As for a non-believer doing it for their own well-being, hell yes. While I don't believe in ethereal beings being a guiding force in my life, I do believe that we each have a tiny amount of impact on the flow of how the planet functions. I won't use "karma" as the correct term, although it is a similar theory. I treat others as I would expect to be treated, knowing full well that 99% of the time I'll be disappointed.
I don't see atheism as selfishness, I see it as an independence of thought... free from all the weight of thousands of years of guilt and campfire stories. I don't worry about whether I'll "make it" into Heaven, my life is much more liberated--knowing that whatever happens, I'll have done what I could...when I could.
Yes your right, in Hindu religion black skin is considered the lowest ring (or something like that) and associated with evil. Which is why I said:Ghandi may have changed the world for the better but was a rascist who would have kicked out every black man woman and child from india if he had his way and mother theresa was a complete fraud who actually did more harm than good because of her beliefs. So i do agree that there are people who twist religion to their own ends..
Perhaps he was, but his influence then cuts both ways because his tactics influenced one of America's greatest civil rights activist, Martin luther king jr.Im not saying I agree with them totally but they've done alot more for this world than any of us.
Are you saying the atheist is less selfish? Well, if hes doin it because it makes him feel good, then thats not any less so is it?Im not talking about the people who recieve the charity... Im asking the question from the personal perspective of both the theist and non theist and how the perceive their actions.
Yes your right, in Hindu religion black skin is considered the lowest ring (or something like that) and associated with evil. Which is why I said:
Perhaps he was, but his influence then cuts both ways because his tactics influenced one of America's greatest civil rights activist, Martin luther king jr.
I dont know so much about teresa, so I'll give you that one . But I know you understand what Im gettin at.
Are you saying the atheist is less selfish? Well, if hes doin it because it makes him feel good, then thats not any less so is it?
Good answer! So whats the single word we're looking for?
Have you ever heard of the gospel of thomas? It was supposedly a book that was edited out of the bible when it was being canonized in 200 A.D.....which leads me to believe that the Bible has been edited MANY times over its existance to the point that it just doesn't make any sense.
Examples:
-God is forgiving but will happily condemn billions to eternal torture.
..
Thats pretty interesting, alright I retract my admiration for mother teresa.If you wish to know more about mother T then simply watch this....
As for the atheist charity giver the main difference is that whilst both will feel emotionally better after the charitable action, the atheist isnt gaining materially where as the theist will be after death. Whilst the non believer cannot claim to be truly altruistic which is the single word im looking for, he's certainly higher up on the scale of altruism than the theist.
jondy, i dont believe in gods but i think theres more to existance than life. why? because i feel like it, it'd be pretty silly to go against what i resonate with for following a standard of either religion or scientific consensus.
I can't work within the constraints of a single word answer.
Interestingly, because I have a sick fascination with thesaurus.com.. look at the way they associate "freethinking"..
http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/freethinking
Freethinking was my single word answer, but.. now I'm scared it'll be misintrepreted 50 different ways.
Edit: Took me so long to type, the answer was already posted. I was thinking of cheating.. but.. that wouldn't have been very altruistic of me. Altruism, btw, is a noble idea.. not practiced as often as most "think" they are.
Like I mentioned before Im not arguing for it. I pointed out that the bible was canonized 200 years A.D.. So thats 200 years that people in the church had err lets say creative freedom with it. And not to mention that it even says in the bible that the first gospel wasnt pinned down until 30 years or so after jesus existed. So it was just word of mouth for that long, and since he preached to the poor and illiterate theres no telling what he actually said and didnt say.it still doesnt make the bible believable. theres too much prejudice and ancient beliefs, and i mean, what is heaven? heck, to me, life is. theres a consistent balance of positive and negative stuff which makes you value both.
Like I mentioned before Im not arguing for it. I pointed out that the bible was canonized 200 years A.D.. So thats 200 years that people in the church had err lets say creative freedom with it. And not to mention that it even says in the bible that the first gospel wasnt pinned down until 30 years or so after jesus existed. So it was just word of mouth for that long, and since he preached to the poor and illiterate theres no telling what he actually said and didnt say.
cjohnson,
Were you refering to the gospel of thomas? Honestly I havent read the whole thing, but yea I remember something along those lines..Supposedly he was a prick when he was a kid.
Add to the fact that theres no historical evidence that he even existed outside of the bible...