bvasgm
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Messages
- 926
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm shure that by now, most of you are aware that two days ago I was "owned" by Chris_D and Zerimski. I made a thread celebrating my 1000th post and promptly had all of them removed from my post count. I apologized to Chris_D and soon had my posts back. Shortly following this, Zerimski swooped in and reset my post count again.
Now, all I'm asking is if you think that their punishment was fair. I'm not saying that some form of punishment isn't necessary, after all, I did break a rule, I created a spam thread. My point is that removing all of my posts, while funny to most of you I'm shure, does seem overly harsh.
Basically all I'm asking is weather or not you think they were justified in setting my post count to zero, rather than reducing it by a smaller ammount, or even banning me for some ammount of time.
Now, all I'm asking is if you think that their punishment was fair. I'm not saying that some form of punishment isn't necessary, after all, I did break a rule, I created a spam thread. My point is that removing all of my posts, while funny to most of you I'm shure, does seem overly harsh.
Basically all I'm asking is weather or not you think they were justified in setting my post count to zero, rather than reducing it by a smaller ammount, or even banning me for some ammount of time.