Let's start the next American revolution

[DeusExMachina]

We should revive the Weathermen.

 

[Shamrock]

Sorry, I just can't resist.

Look at my join date. Look at yours.

Look at my post count. Look at yours.

I can't say I approve of your shitty threads that boost your post count.

 

[RakuraiTenjin]

A lot of those ideas suck ass.

 

[French Ninja]

The military will be 1/10 to 1/15 its current size.

:|
***
*looks at thread title*
Don't tell me Solaris got to you.

 

[Nat Turner]

Look at my join date. Look at yours.

Look at my post count. Look at yours.

I can't say I approve of your shitty threads that boost your post count.

Yeah, mines about double the rate of yours. I'm sorry to see you don't approve of my sp34k.

 

[Icarusintel]

Look at my join date. Look at yours.

Look at my post count. Look at yours.

I can't say I approve of your shitty threads that boost your post count.

QFTMFT

*looks at join date*
*looks at post count*

.... Shit

 

[CptStern]

I always liked the idea of a revolution ...let the fools throw themselves at the heavily armed government and watch the slaughter from afar ..and as soon as they've become all complacent WHAM coup d'etat so freakin fast they wont know what hit them!

it is then that we shall raise our flags!!

 

[Shamrock]

QFTMFT

*looks at join date*
*looks at post count*

.... Shit

QFTMFT

 

[Nat Turner]

QFTMFT

You totally posted that just to raise your post count. Now you can no longer be a colonel of the 5th regiment in my army.

sucks to be you...

 

[Uriel]

I <3 my government.

 

[Raziaar]

It's a fact that almost nobody dies to terrorism every year, yet so much tax money disproportionally goes into fighting it.

Almost nobody? Maybe in the united states, but people die to Terrorism overseas all the time.


I don't understand what it is with some people. They don't want our country to get involved with world politics to help people out, like demolishing oppressive regimes(even if they were supported in the past by whoever the **** in our government), yet they expect our country to help out countries with all sorts of money.

Both need to be done. YOu need to help out the little guy if the little guy is the just one, whether it be money or firepower against a wicked and cruel oppressor. You can't just sit on your ass, growing fat and content while the world goes to shit around you. Thats selfish.

 

[Nat Turner]

Both need to be done. YOu need to help out the little guy if the little guy is the just one, whether it be money or firepower against a wicked and cruel oppressor. You can't just sit on your ass, growing fat and content while the world goes to shit around you. Thats selfish.

No, it's not selfish at all. They don't even want our help, and it shouldn't be our position to police the world like we're currently doing. If they needed us so badly they'd ask for it, not attack us until we leave.

 

[Raziaar]

No, it's not selfish at all. They don't even want our help, and it shouldn't be our position to police the world like we're currently doing. If they needed us so badly they'd ask for it, not attack us until we leave.

I'm not talking about this Iraq war.

I'm talking about other events like the Gulf War, where Iraq invaded Kuwait, and we helped push them out of Kuwait. That was just in my opinion.

If people just sat on their asses and didn't lend a military hand sometimes, people like hitler would have no problem conquering vast numbers of countries.

But as long as no shit happens in your corner of the world, all is well, right?

 

[Nat Turner]

I'm not talking about this Iraq war.

I'm talking about other events like the Gulf War, where Iraq invaded Kuwait, and we helped push them out of Kuwait. That was just in my opinion.

If people just sat on their asses and didn't lend a military hand sometimes, people like hitler would have no problem conquering vast numbers of countries.

But as long as no shit happens in your corner of the world, all is well, right?

It's not our sole job though. A coalition of many countries should first be formed through the U.N. security council before we use any military action.

 

[Raziaar]

It's not our sole job though. A coalition of many countries should first be formed through the U.N. security council before we use any military action.

True, but sometimes before any damn thing gets happened because of the Bureaucratical mess it is, thousands or hundreds of thousands have died.

 

[Cole]

If people just sat on their asses and didn't lend a military hand sometimes, people like hitler would have no problem conquering vast numbers of countries.

Actually there may of not even been a hitler.
WW1:
Austria attacks Servia......well:
1)Russia wouldn't of come to aid
2)Germany wouldn't of had to declare war on russia
3)Then France wouldn't of had to declare war on germany for declaring war on russia
4)Even if all the events did happen above, England wouldn't of gotton involved when Germany got Belgium into the war.
5)If England hadn't gotton involved there would of been no need to do as big of an unrestricted submarine campaign
6)Only reason to go to war for the USA would of been the Zimmermans Note.
7)Germany would be much bigger, and hitler would of never taken power.
8)If England hadn't gotton involved, then all the news wouldn't of made Germany sound so bad in WW1, thus we would still have a good opinion of them thus very little likeness for us to go to War.
9)Hitler probably wouldn't of come to power, and if he had he would of had a much easier time because Germany would have many more resources, and wouldn't of demilitarize.
So many things would of changed.

 

[Nat Turner]

True, but sometimes before any damn thing gets happened because of the Bureaucratical mess it is, thousands or hundreds of thousands have died.

Well you shouldn't go around saving the world until you fix the problems in your own country, unless there's an extremely important and overriding reason, or if you're going along with the U.N. It's all about priorities.

 

[Raziaar]

Actually there may of not even been a hitler.

People like Hitler ALWAYS find a way to break through the seams.

 

[Uriel]

Peanuts in your poop

 

[Cooper]

Look at my join date. Look at yours.

Look at my post count. Look at yours.

Look at my join date. Look at yours.

Look at my post count. Look at yours.


I WIN!

 

[Uriel]

Look at my wang, Look at yours.
Look at my jewels. Look at yours.
Now look at Short Recoils, Oh My Gosh We all Lose.

 

[Skaadi]

If it involves movement, then you're on your own.

 

[Murray]

Why start a revolution? The government is so incompetent that, if we just stay back, it will probably crumble all by itself.

 

[Ravioli]

FIGHT DA POWA!!!!!!!!!!

Well, im not American but still, i think that Americas government is ****t up so...il just sit back and watch the show! :smoking:

'Ya wanna ban da Ak...it wasnt registrated anyway!"- Ice Cube

 

[ríomhaire]

Good luck! Bush should be punched in the c*nt.

 

[bvasgm]

Fight the power that's fighting the power!!

I think I'll just sit back and watch you all get owned. It's like Murray said, the current administration is going to implode upon itself eventually anyway, so why bother?

edit: 4

 

[15357]

"You rebel scum!"


EDIT:

The military will be 1/10 to 1/15 its current size.

What? So this revolution won't have a corporate military police goverment? BAD!

And no more soldiers in other countries? D:

 

[Lucid]

GL HF.

I'll just stay in my fall-out shelter and watch you all get your asses handed to you on TV.

 

[Sulkdodds]

You can give it a go. Unfortunately, for a revolution to work, EVERYONE must want it.

Prostitution will be legal. Age of consent will be 12 or 13.

Good morning, Brian Peppers. The age of consent is very conservative for a reason: it must be set at a point where EVERYONE is DEFINITELY ready to have sex. At 12 or 13, they aren't.

 

[clarky003]

No no no.. its all wrong, if you want to start a modern revolution you need to develop some kind of super weapon, preferably EMP based, DEW's.

 

[Beerdude26]

no no no, its all wrong, if you want to start a modern revolution you need to develop some kind of super weapon, preferably E.M.P based, any sort of D.E.W.

Okay how about this:

Copyright RJMC 2005-2006

 

[Ome_Vince]

ill help, just gimme an MG42 and ship me to the states

 

[15357]

Beerdude, I'll take 50 of them, how much?

 

[Sulkdodds]

if you want to start a modern revolution you need to develop some kind of super weapon

SCALAR WAVES!

 

[Nat Turner]

You can give it a go. Unfortunately, for a revolution to work, EVERYONE must want it.

Good morning, Brian Peppers. The age of consent is very conservative for a reason: it must be set at a point where EVERYONE is DEFINITELY ready to have sex. At 12 or 13, they aren't.

The age of consent should be when people are biologically mature enough.

 

[Sulkdodds]

What, so a different age of consent for each person? That would be quite complicated.

 

[Nat Turner]

What, so a different age of consent for each person? That would be quite complicated.

Basically prosecution when it's not consensual or is obvious pedophilia. Either a low age limit (has to be same for everyone) or total abolishment of the age of consent would work.

edit:

When people are sexually mature, it's absolute tyranny to enforce arbitrary societal values on them and tell them they can't have sex under the law. That's my stance pretty much.

 

[Sulkdodds]

If the limit has to be the same for everyone then it can't be low because some people are late starters puberty-wise. You've got to either have it high or not have it at all - set up some sort of system to decide whether it's okay or not. Which sounds dubious.

 

[Nat Turner]

If the limit has to be the same for everyone then it can't be low because some people are late starters puberty-wise. You've got to either have it high or not have it at all - set up some sort of system to decide whether it's okay or not. Which sounds dubious.

It's ok to set it low even if some aren't ready. I'm not saying that adolescents should go out and have sex, just that it shouldn't be a crime.

 

[Sulkdodds]

Sure, but still - 12 or 13? A great big proportion of boys (dunno about girls though) aren't really ready to have sex at 13, I think. Perhaps there should be an age-difference rule instead of an age-limit...but that'd be a hell of a lot more complicated and very very hard to produce something comprehensive. Better, surely, to set a relatively high age of consent. Assuming paedophiles are mostly caught because the child tells someone or because someone who knows the paedophile suspects someone, then if both parties consent nobody is going to know - and even if somebody does know, they're not going to care so much. It's not without its problems because then you get 16 year olds being tried to statutory rape of their 14-year old girlfriends.

Note: I think the age of consent should probably be 15, but depending on statistics (which I don't know) it could be different for boys and girls.