Atomic_Piggy
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2006
- Messages
- 6,485
- Reaction score
- 2
http://blog.norml.org/2008/11/05/truth-prevails/
No its not legal, but its a step closer.
No its not legal, but its a step closer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Lowell
In the heart of the Merrimack Valley, Lowell is best known for its quality needle drugs and beautiful naturally occurring broken glass fields. Lowell's historic hypodermic needle mills attract over seven million tourists every year, providing an important boost to the local economy and allowing city officials to put tax dollars back in city residents' pockets which they promptly spend on heroin. There is also an infamous hooker hangout called Appleton Street, where they charge as little as 50 cents for head.
Thanks a lot, right-wing, conservative, Christian fuckwads that we call the government.
That's the irony of it all. Alcohol is thousands of times more dangerous than marijuana or mushrooms. Whoever has the most powerful lobbyists wins...Good luck with the retarded consequence of this decision: you can use marijuana, but not grow it. It's the same way here, licensed coffeeshops are allowed to sell it, but there is actually no legal way for them to obtain it, buying it from shady dealers to full-blown organized criminals. It's utterly and completely retarded.
Fresh shrooms are to be banned here by the 1st of December, dried shrooms are already banned. Hell, it will even be illegal to pick them in the forest! Thanks a lot, right-wing, conservative, Christian fuckwads that we call the government. And why? Because a handful (not even that, I think there were two) tourists died using them, always under the influence of alcohol or with preexisting mental conditions, so they were deemed a hazard for public health. As opposed to alcohol and cigarettes..
That's the irony of it all. Alcohol is thousands of times more dangerous than marijuana or mushrooms. Whoever has the most powerful lobbyists wins...
I'm not talking about potency, I'm talking about danger. Alcohol kills, injures, and addicts magnitudes more people than weed or shrooms could ever dream of.lawl, shrooms are WAY more potent than alcohol.
Anyway, I voted for this, and I'm satisfied with the outcome. Even though I quit smoking, this will certainly make many peoples' lives MUCH easier, as well as save money for the state.
Also, @ hool: what the HELL are you talking about? hahaha
I giggled at the Dutch people in this thread whining about THEIR conservative government. You guys really have no idea
Also yadda yadda weed should be legal blah blah blah alcohol is deadly etc etc.
I'm not talking about potency, I'm talking about danger. Alcohol kills, injures, and addicts magnitudes more people than weed or shrooms could ever dream of.
I've done both my share of times as well, and I agree that shrooms may be more intense, but I don't think that makes them more dangerous.That's because the number of people that consume psilocybes is infinitesimally smaller than that of drinkers. As someone who's tried both a good number of times, I can tell you with great confidence that mushrooms are FAR more intense and dangerous if not treated very carefully.That said, they're f*ckin' awesome! :E
However, please please PLEASE don't turn this into a drug thread though... well, at least, not more than it already is haha.
This was my point, the nature of shrooms makes them something people do occasionally, not habitually like alcohol. The overall negative impact of alcohol on society is much greater than that of shrooms, and I think it would remain that way even if shrooms were legalized.Shrooms can be more intense on your psychological state.
People who do shrooms are not likely to plan on driving a car any time soon, have no real risk of overdosing on the substance, and at worst will probably only result in a bad trip. Fatal trips involving some dude leaping off his balcony or walking into traffic - the latter being an act of idiocy more than anything - are rare, though sensationalized.
I am more understanding of the governments' ways in dealing with this kind of stuff. I used to be all "**** drugs and alcohol" but now I'm the same but with the perspective that all the government wants is a cut of it. I mean if MJ is illegal, why not cigarettes? It's not as powerful but its still a harmful drug.
Alcohol is worse, imo, and that's fine to buy. I can think clearly if I want when I'm high, when I'm drunk (which is rare, as I hate alcohol/being drunk), I can't do shit.
This was my point, the nature of shrooms makes them something people do occasionally, not habitually like alcohol. The overall negative impact of alcohol on society is much greater than that of shrooms, and I think it would remain that way even if shrooms were legalized.
if you're thinking clearly you aren't smoking nearly enough
I find that although my normal thought process is a little off, i notice things I never seem to notice when im sober.
You could make a GTA game out of MA. We got hookers and all kinds of crazy shit in Lawrence. Then you got all the crack heads in Lowell with the ethnic gang rivalries there (right next to my town).
Now Lowell is bringing all their crap to my town because they are expanding. We need to stop the cops from chasing around kids with some pot and go after these rapists, etc. Plus the bill sounded like it would take a more serious approach to it if you had more than an ounce. If you got more than an ounce, your probably selling it or going to a party (with other druggies). Everybody goes "ohhh it's so historic with the best sports teams there!".
gonna go smoke some hydro brb!
nice same dude
just smoked some hydro
gonna go smoke some hydro brb!
nice same dude
**** yeah. just smoked some hydro :thumbs::smoking:
high as ****
My point exactly.So what?