Tollbooth Willie
The Freeman
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Messages
- 17,553
- Reaction score
- 830
Seriously. We have to use the Imperial system (or International System of Measurements as they call it) in school. Makes school work that much harder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Seriously. We have to use the Imperial system (or International System of Measurements as they call it) in school. Makes school work that much harder.
lolSeriously. We have to use the Imperial system (or International System of Measurements as they call it) in school. Makes school work that much harder.
**** them!I screwed up on a physics exam because I wrote my answer in Newtons when they wanted it in "slugs". Wtf? I've never even heard of slugs. (Apparentley its 32 pounds)
I screwed up on a physics exam because I wrote my answer in Newtons when they wanted it in "slugs". Wtf? I've never even heard of slugs. (Apparentley its 32 pounds)
I screwed up on a physics exam because I wrote my answer in Newtons when they wanted it in "slugs". Wtf? I've never even heard of slugs. (Apparentley its 32 pounds)
well, it had to do with acceleration around the orbit of a planet, and the data was in ft/sec^2. and pounds and I simply converted them all into metric (because it was much easier) and when I got to the end I wasn't sure what to put the answer in, so I just left it in metric. 1 Slug is apparentley equal to 1 G in imperial (or 9.8 Newtons in metric)
In which parallel reality, exactly?Simpler? Imperial
I don't see how "10cm in a decimeter, 10 dm in a metre, 1000m in a kilometer" is less simple than "12in in a foot, 3 ft in a yard, 1760yd in a mile".better? Metric
Simpler? Imperial
I have never heard of a decimeter in my life.I don't see how "10cm in a decimeter, 10 dm in a metre, 1000m in a kilometer" is less simple than "12in in a foot, 3 ft in a yard, 1760yd in a mile".
I have never heard of a decimeter in my life.
I have never heard of a decimeter in my life.
Honestly, in the UK education system, we've always used metric and never mentioned decimeters.Lol what? I'm an American and have used Imperial all my life, and I still know what a decimeter is. Come on solaris, pay attention in school for once.
Honestly, in the UK education system, we've always used metric and never mentioned decimeters.
Wow. The US educates its students about a system that it doesn't even use than a nation that actually uses the system. Mind boggling.Honestly, in the UK education system, we've always used metric and never mentioned decimeters.
Why the hell would you want a decimeter, it's pointless, might as well say 10cm, or 15cm rather than 1.5 decimeters.
What the ****?
Wikipedia said:Gimli Glider is a nickname given to an aircraft involved in an infamous incident in aviation history. On 23 July 1983, a Boeing 767-200 jet, Air Canada Flight 143, ran out of fuel at 41,000 feet (12 km) altitude about halfway through its flight from Montreal to Edmonton. The crew was able to glide the aircraft safely to a forced landing at Gimli Industrial Park Airport, a former airbase at Gimli, Manitoba.
The error occurred when it came time to calculate how much fuel was needed for the flight from Montreal to Edmonton. The calculations were based on weight instead of volume, which required a conversion in the measurements. The incident aircraft was the first aircraft in the Air Canada fleet that measured fuel in kilograms, whereas all of the other manuals and planes in the Air Canada fleet used pounds. The pilots used a unit conversion factor of 1.77 lb/L. However, a fuel load measured in kilograms should have used the conversion factor of 0.8 kg/L. After using the 1.77 factor, the figure 20,400 was entered into the aircraft's computer, attempting to tell it that they had 20,400 pounds of fuel on board. Because of the switch to the metric system, the computer's firmware had been changed to interpret the amount entered in kilograms. The computer interpreted the figure as 20,400 kilograms and indicated that there was enough fuel based on the erroneous input. In fact, the aircraft only had 9,144 kg (20,160 lb) onboard, too little for the flight to Edmonton.