Necrophelia help

Choose whichever option fits best

  • I find necrophelia immoral.

    Votes: 54 58.7%
  • I do not find necrophelia immoral.

    Votes: 19 20.7%
  • I do not have an opinion on the subject

    Votes: 19 20.7%

  • Total voters
    92

Ikerous

Newbie
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Messages
5,622
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a college research paper on necrophelia and it'd help alot if i could get arguments on both sides of the issue from an ethical perspective. Personally, I dont think theres anything immoral about necrophelia, but hopefully someone will think differently

Also, if you happen to know anything about the legality of necrophelia, either in america or anywhere else, thatd help too ^_^

But mostly.. do what you do best. Argue!
 
Ikerous said:
But mostly.. do what you do best.


Penis package penis derail thread penis.

Are you seriously writing a paper on necrophilia?
 
NotATool said:
Penis package penis derail thread penis.
No derailing my thread with penis talk!
This is supposed to be a good clean thread about ****ing dead ppl.
NotATool said:
Are you seriously writing a paper on necrophilia?
Yes.
 
where's the option for:

"I'm not really doing a research paper, I just wanted to know if I should visit the morgue tonight"






i dont think anyone would seriously vote for option 2, if they did they wouldnt admit it
 
CptStern said:
i dont think anyone would seriously vote for option 2, if they did they wouldnt admit it
I said in my inntial post i dont find anything immoral about necrophelia...
And i honestly dont
If you feel differently, please, argue your side
 
It's not immoral if the person agrees to it before death.

It's still ****ing disgusting though.
 
I read the thread title and i thought: Whoa, Ikerous really has problems. :O :O :naughty: :E :naughty:
 
Well, if they died like 2 years ago, then you dug them up and ****ed them, thats damn nasty, but if they died like 5 seconds ago, it's still immoral but not as disgusting. Plus what RukuraiTenjin said.
 
RakuraiTenjin said:
It's not immoral if the person agrees to it before death.
Why is it immoral if they didn't agrea to it?
The concept of consentual sex comes from the idea that we should respect others basic human rights. But don't those rights leave when you die? Or do you still have them? Or am i completely off base?
Dog-- said:
Well, if they died like 2 years ago, then you dug them up and ****ed them, thats damn nasty, but if they died like 5 seconds ago, it's still immoral but not as disgusting.
What makes it immoral?
 
I was going to vote for option 2 but I don't want a beating from CptStern.

D:
 
It's like rape, you're having sex without their permission. Not to mention the fact that it's ****ing disgusting...

If they agree to it before death there's nothing immoral about it, but still...it's ****ing disgusting.

weird thing to write a paper on dude :x
 
bvasgm said:
It's like rape, you're having sex without their permission. Not to mention the fact that it's ****ing disgusting...

If they agree to it before death there's nothing immoral about it, but still...it's ****ing disgusting.

weird thing to write a paper on dude :x
Like i asked in my post above, do dead people have the same rights as living people?
Would it be wrong to kick a dead person as well?
 
I think that whether it is disgusting is no reason for it to be immoral/illegal.

I don't know how dead people are treated under the law: inflatable dolls or ex-people?

I think they should be treated like ex-people, because that's exactly what they are, hence necrophilia without permission would be non-consensual sex.
 
Ikerous said:
I said in my inntial post i dont find anything immoral about necrophelia...
And i honestly dont
If you feel differently, please, argue your side

? gah corpse rape ...how can that not be immoral?


rakurai: that's the weirdest thing ever ...consenting to sex ...but only after your dead ..talk about dedication
 
I think the real victims of necrophilia are those who once cherished the dead.
 
NotATool said:
I think the real victims of necrophilia are those who once cherished the dead.
Interesting. So then if the dead person had no family it would be an ethical thing to do?
 
eh? doesnt the body deserve some respect? ...if I didnt want a manpole up my anus when I was alive why would I want it when I'm dead?
 
Danimal said:
I was going to vote for option 2 but I don't want a beating from CptStern.

D:
Nobody does. NOBODY does.
Wait.... So people actually **** dead peoples' corpses? What the F*CK is wrong with people these days?
 
Acually this depends on who you have sex with, someone you know, someone you kinda know, or someone you don't know.
 
CptStern said:
eh? doesnt the body deserve some respect? ...if I didnt want a manpole up my anus when I was alive why would I want it when I'm dead?


Because you'd be dead, hence not have any needs or wants.
 
I think putting your penis into someone who is dead is just plain silly.










penis.
 
Dog-- said:
Acually this depends on who you have sex with, someone you know, someone you kinda know, or someone you don't know.
Very interesting. Please elaborate.
 
NotATool said:
Because you'd be dead, hence not have any needs or wants.


so then would you consent to it? if your drivers licence had a checkbox that read: "save body for corpse sex", you'd check yes?
 
CptStern said:
so then would you consent to it? if your drivers licence had a checkbox that read: "save body for corpse sex", you'd check yes?

Hell ****ing yes.
 
CptStern said:
so then would you consent to it? if your drivers licence had a checkbox that read: "save body for corpse sex", you'd check yes?
I wouldn't care.
But then again I want to be cremated.
Which is something else i wouldnt enjoy if i were alive...
 
CptStern said:
so then would you consent to it? if your drivers licence had a checkbox that read: "save body for corpse sex", you'd check yes?

No because it would offend my loved ones.
 
CptStern said:
rakurai: that's the weirdest thing ever ...consenting to sex ...but only after your dead ..talk about dedication
Haha yeah it is weird and nasty.
 
I would want all the women in the world to pleasure themselves on my massive, 20 degree bent package.
 
If it's someone you know, then you would know their needs/wants/things they don't want.

For example, you've got a girlfriend who just died, who you've had sex with before, it doesn't sound so immoral that you'd have sex with her when she's dead. (I still think it's gross though)

If it's someone you kinda knew, then you would have the basic idea of what they'd want.

If it was a stranger I doubt they would wanna have sex with someone they don't know, it's like going up to any random person on the street and saying "Wanna **** me?"
 
Pesmerga said:
Hell ****ing yes.

even if this was what met you once you died?

redneck.jpg
 
Ikerous said:
I wouldn't care.
But then again I want to be cremated.
Which is something else i wouldnt enjoy if i were alive...

why do you want to be cremated? if you dont care what happens to you (dont care about sex after death) why not just dump your body into a ditch by the side of the road ...why have a funeral at all?




Pesmerga said:
Hey, you can't be picky.


SUIIII!!!!!!
 
Everyone seems to be implying that dead people have the same right to concent that living people do. Do they have all the same rights? Or just some of them? For example, if i poked a dead guy in the eye, i wouldnt consider it immoral. If if its just some, why this one and not others?
 
hahaha, I'm the only one who said it wasn't immoral :laugh:

here's how I see it: as long as you're not digging up graves to do it, and nobody else knows, go ahead. The previous owner of that body is clearly not going to mind. I mean, I think it's pretty gross, but hey, whatever floats your boat.
 
CptStern said:
why do you want to be cremated? if you dont care what happens to you (dont care about sex after death) why not just dump your body into a ditch by the side of the road ...why have a funeral at all?
I actually dont care if im created. I was just making a point. I'd be fine with just dumping my body, although there are certain sanitation issues to deal with. Hence why burning or barrying would be the best course of action...
JNightshade said:
hahaha, I'm the only one who said it wasn't immoral :laugh:

here's how I see it: as long as you're not digging up graves to do it, and nobody else knows, go ahead. The previous owner of that body is clearly not going to mind. I mean, I think it's pretty gross, but hey, whatever floats your boat.
<3
 
Ok, so you wouldn't care if you got poked in the eye when your dead, would you wanna be poked in the ass with a penis? Is that how you'd want your loved ones to remember you?

By your logic, every one who dies should be chucked away without respect in some body dump?
 
No, I wouldn't. I would ****ing cast raise dead on myself and beat their god damn skull into the ground.


Then battle the legions of Diablo.
 
Dog-- said:
Ok, so you wouldn't care if you got poked in the eye when your dead, would you wanna be poked in the ass with a penis?
There are certain social stigmas about necrophelia..
So theres a natural tendency to shy away from it in all cases
But I wouldnt care about it for the same reasons i wouldnt care about my eye. And i think the ethics apply to each equally
 
Back
Top