Alig
Newbie
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 1,672
- Reaction score
- 0
EVIL said:dont see why you needed to type that in colour
Ati will offcource have the best image quality.. thay have the best image quality for years.. nvidea is going to base thier card for speed intead of image quality. so it seems so thats is not my type of card.
i dont care about that 12 fps performance.. over Ati
Actually, nvidia is on the same level as ATI's image quality near enough.
i'm glad SOMEONE brought this up. i'm not sure how reputable tomshardware.com is but jesus i saw some of the screen shot comparisons, and while nvidia's new card is screaming fast... the image quality was still shitty, most especially in farcry. sorry, but to me the little extra pixelizations = utter shit. ... but then i'm sensitive to that because i'm an artist so ehhhh... i'd take image quality over speed any day(as long as the game is playable with the good image
What screens would they be then? I've read through the entire article and the only screen i can tell any differences in (Baring in mind...they are zoomed to 200%, you dont play games like that) are the FarCry screens and only because of patch 1.1 for FC has nvidia cards gone like that, wait for patch 1.2 and all will be resolved and ATI will no longer look _any_ better in FC.
--------------------------
I'll be buying a new card, not sure which yet, probably nvidia's just because ive got an nvidia now and ATI has poor driver support and poor support for the game i play the most atm and have done for the past 1.5years. :hmph: