Not directly related to HL2 but affects gamers!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Banana
  • Start date Start date
B

Banana

Guest
Dont know if people have heard about this but i will post it anyway:

From Shacknews.com
After failed discussions with Activision, the following websites will not be carrying the Call of Duty playable demo, even after its exclusivity is over. This is due to Activision's decision to not accede to the reasonable request of making demo freely available to all game enthusiasts at the same time.

3D Downloads
3D Gamers
Blue's News
FileFront
FileShack
Gamer's Hell
Tiscali Games
WorthPlaying

The above-listed websites hope to show Activision that the enthusiast industry is strongly opposed to the idea of exclusive demo releases.

Feedback from our users shows that gamers hate to be forced through a single point of congestion if they want a demo right away. While these websites are actually competitors, this competition provides the freedom of choice that enthusiasts want by offering the widest possible distribution of any demo (a sample intended to interest as many gamers as possible in the full product, after all) rather than the most restricted one.

Therefore, something this disrespectful of the industry as a whole has inspired all of these websites to stand together in this open letter.

Deals like this hurt the industry much more than they could possibly enhance a single relationship, and we ask for your support in sending out this message.
 
I hate how they make it FilePlanet members exclusive. It's so stupid to have to pay to get downloads.
 
Yeah! Show them bastards at activision that it's not right to restrict demo releases!

Although this will make the demo harder to get once it is not exclusive any more.
 
Not too big of a deal, I mean it'll be on bittorrent, edonkey, etc within minutes of the first downloads completing..
 
so basically what activision are saying is 'unless you stop being money grabbing bastards and let people get involved in there hobby with out paying prices to get you a boat, then you aint gettin our download!!'?
If thats correct, then thats great:D
if not, then its 1.00 in the morning and i cant make sense of stuff so bleh

EDIT:ok, i think im totally wrong there, but bleh, i'll leave it up if people wanna make fun of what i said:p
 
Originally posted by supangr
Not too big of a deal, I mean it'll be on bittorrent, edonkey, etc within minutes of the first downloads completing..

The point isnt whether or not the Demo can be gotten through other means. It basically is that Activision and FP have now decided to make people pay for a game DEMO. How do they expect people to test the game and see if they want to buy the full thing if they are expected to pay for it.

Personally, exclusives bother me but i can understand platform specific exclusives (doesnt mean i like them). But to make a DEMO exclusive means limiting the market you are exposing that demo to, which makes no sense from a marketing perspective unless you are looking for a small testbase, which isnt the case here.
 
On the down side, it's given Activision a hell of a lot of free publicity. I bet they get record downloads.
 
yeah the idea of having to PAY to test a game that you will have to PAY (ok, should pay you pirates) for later is ludicris.
 
Originally posted by koopa
On the down side, it's given Activision a hell of a lot of free publicity. I bet they get record downloads.

Yes, but it isnt very good publicity imho.
 
Activision = limp

big thumbs down to FP too

One of the most anticipated titles for wwii gaming clans, and they're trying to shaft the community & run up FP's bottom line :p
 
I note that four more have joined since Banana first posted:

AusGamers
EdgeFiles (Callofduty.org)
GameGossip
Loadedinc

Would be nice to add the major torrent hosts to there as well, I guess.
 
This is pretty cool. I really hate fileplanet; most major game demos and betas are exclusive to fileplanet subscribers. Gamespy is evil.
 
LOL!

Dont be a bunch of ****ing sissys, its only 25 cents a day to subscribe, and you get acess to exclusive content. Where do people get off these days thinking they dont have to pay for anything? boohoo music should be free, ill just boot up kazaa and steal it. Boohoo i shouldnt have to pay to see a movie, ill just d/l it. Boohoo i shouldnt have to pay fileplanet for their services, ill just go to a forum and ****ing whine, BOOHOO! Cry me a river.

Heres a hint to those who havnt caught on yet, LIFE ISNT FREE! As a man its your responsibilitty to pay your way in this world. You know what a baby does when he doesnt have what he wants? He cries about it. You know what a man does when he doesnt have what he wants? He does what he has to do to pay for it, or he goes on without it.

Grow up.
 
Originally posted by Doom3>hl2
LOL!

Dont be a bunch of ****ing sissys, its only 25 cents a day to subscribe, and you get acess to exclusive content. Where do people get off these days thinking they dont have to pay for anything? boohoo music should be free, ill just boot up kazaa and steal it. Boohoo i shouldnt have to pay to see a movie, ill just d/l it. Boohoo i shouldnt have to pay fileplanet for their services, ill just go to a forum and ****ing whine, BOOHOO! Cry me a river.

Heres a hint to those who havnt caught on yet, LIFE ISNT FREE! As a man its your responsibilitty to pay your way in this world. You know what a baby does when he doesnt have what he wants? He cries about it. You know what a man does when he doesnt have what he wants? He does what he has to do to pay for it, or he goes on without it.

Grow up.

Dont make me laugh. No offense intended but i think your post irrelevant. First of all, i do NOT think life is free or should be. I was raised on the concept of paying for the services you use. I OWN (as in paid for) a LEGAL copy of Photoshop, I plan to buy Dreamweaver and Flash, I BUY games and music. I am not rich, i am a college student and its hard to always pay for things but i believe i should pay for services i use, especially if i use them often. I take offence at your post because you spread accusation without knowing what you are talking about.

That aside, the point is not merely an issue of cost. Its an issue that Activision is limiting the spread of a demo of a product they want people to buy to a select few who pay for a service with FP (not that fileplanet is much of a service if you ask me). I dont fully blame Activision because FP probably paid them a chunk of change in order to get the exclusive, and since Activision is out to make money well why not. Nevertheless, a demo is an advertisement. Guess what but Activision is trying to SELL the game to us, making people pay to try it out is just ludicrious and limiting it to the small set of people who have an FP account just limits their audience. Its not hard to see that this defeats the purpose of releasing a demo in the first place. Also, part of the problem (as i read somewhere but forget where) is that Activision refuses to tell sites when the exclusivity deal would end. It could last a week or a month.

I dont know about you but i dont want to be subject to stupid ploys by people who would like me to spend money on their products.

<end rant>
 
no sh*t ife isnt free Mr. Moneybags, but its simply being greedy to want people to pay just to get a glimpse of a game so that they can pay more later.


PS and OT: The "greater than" sign in your nickname is pointed the wrong way, might want to fix that, or else maybe youve stumbled into the wrong board ;)
 
Guess what? WHAT? You aren't paying for the Call of Duty demo. You're paying for Fileplanet service which OFFERS the demo. Its an exclusive, therefore an incentive to sign up for Fileplanet. The demo requires a FILEPLANET subscription to download, you do not pay to download the demo.

And if it frustrates you so much, that sometimes you can't get something you want for free just because other similar things are free.... don't buy it when its release. Fight the system, bring down the man. Logical progression is EVIL. Pay to download is a horrid idea. Kazaa for life!
 
Actually I'm not paying for FP or for the COD demo, nor am I pirating it. I simply will not play it. So please try not to throw me into some stereotype, and sorry if my views conflicted with yours. I am a horrible human being and you should put me out of my misery.
 
Banana....

I don tgive a **** how you were raised or what kind of shit you have paid for, the fact remains you guys are just crying because you cant get the demo for free. You dont seem to understand that Activision can do whatever the hell they want with the demos, they are not obligated to make sure every gamer who is slightly interested in the demo can get it fast and easy with as little trouble as possible. If they dont want to pamper a bunch of whiney gamers they dont have to. If they want to make some cash by selling exclusitivity to fileplanet thats their choice. If you want the demo you have to play by the rules of the person who is giving the demo.

I dont know about you but i dont want to be subject to stupid ploys by people who would like me to spend money on their products

Awww, boohoo. poor thing. NOBODY wants to be subject to stupid ploys AKA smart business moves by greedy people who want to rob you AKA business people who are just doing their job by selling a product. But its their choice, not yours. The world isnt built around your wants, its built around very simple ideas such as, "I have something you want and i expect compensation for letting you have it"
 
Originally posted by Doom3>hl2
LOL!

Dont be a bunch of ****ing sissys, its only 25 cents a day to subscribe, and you get acess to exclusive content. Where do people get off these days thinking they dont have to pay for anything? boohoo music should be free, ill just boot up kazaa and steal it. Boohoo i shouldnt have to pay to see a movie, ill just d/l it. Boohoo i shouldnt have to pay fileplanet for their services, ill just go to a forum and ****ing whine, BOOHOO! Cry me a river.

Heres a hint to those who havnt caught on yet, LIFE ISNT FREE! As a man its your responsibilitty to pay your way in this world. You know what a baby does when he doesnt have what he wants? He cries about it. You know what a man does when he doesnt have what he wants? He does what he has to do to pay for it, or he goes on without it.

Grow up.


Go back to germany Hitler
 
can we place bets on how long it takes him to be banned....

dont let him get to you guys....he is just a kiddy looking for attention.
 
You dont say? And all the time I thought this guy with the name Doom3>HL2 with a D3 avator on a HL2 board was here to share his informative opinions ;)
 
Originally posted by Doom3>hl2
You dont seem to understand that Activision can do whatever the hell they want with the demos, they are not obligated to make sure every gamer who is slightly interested in the demo can get it fast and easy with as little trouble as possible. If they dont want to pamper a bunch of whiney gamers they dont have to. If they want to make some cash by selling exclusitivity to fileplanet thats their choice. If you want the demo you have to play by the rules of the person who is giving the demo.
I think you've misunderstood the whole consumer-retailer thing. Sure, they don't have to be nice to us, but then we don't have to buy copies of their game, either. They'll change their minds.
 
The big change in distribution came when shareware was introduced. Part of the game was given away FREE without any strings attatched. This was a huge success.

Activision is stepping backwards. Face it... a demo is a beefed up commercial! It's advertising, in the hopes that you'll buy the product you see. Would you pay for movie trailers? Would you pay for radio commercials? Would you pay for magazine ads?

The big companies are going to have to see the demo for what it is. Expensive advertising that should be free. Companies spend millions of dollars each year advertising and gaining publicity for their products. Activision has made the mistake of thinking they can profit from a commercial.

Yes, some things in life ARE free as an individual. Advertising in the capitalist society is the burden of large companies and publishers, NOT the responsibility of the consumer. Asking me to pay for a subscription for more advertising is the same thing that happened to the cable companies when they started including commercials in the paid content. It didn't make many people happy, and if we don't stop it now, we'll be paying for THEIR advertising.
 
I think you've misunderstood the whole consumer-retailer thing. Sure, they don't have to be nice to us, but then we don't have to buy copies of their game, either. They'll change their minds.

No, i havnt misunderstood anything. Your not buying there kindness, your buying their product. If you want their product then i dont see how your opinion about their compassion for the poor or selfish gamer has anything to do with it. To sell exclusitivity to someone for a short time before giving it freely is a smart way to get a few extra bucks. The ONLY people who would be offended by such an action are cheapskates who dont think they should pay.
 
Ah well. What can you expect from a Doom3 fanboy? Anyone dumb enough to go trolling on a HL2 forum saying D3 is better is most likely to be a reactionary blowhard as well.
 
Originally posted by ElFuhrer
Ah well. What can you expect from a Doom3 fanboy? Anyone dumb enough to go trolling on a HL2 forum saying D3 is better is most likely to be a reactionary blowhard as well.

well put well put
 
Originally posted by Doom3>hl2
I dont give a **** how you were raised or what kind of shit you have paid for, the fact remains you guys are just crying because you cant get the demo for free.

Well you know, I CARE. I didnt state those things because i thought you had any interest. You blatantly accused people on this forum (thus including myself) of not paying for things or not realizing that life isnt free. I stated those things about myself to prove to you that not everyone behaves the way you think. You made a blanket accusation and i proved you wrong. Simple as that.

You dont seem to understand that Activision can do whatever the hell they want with the demos, they are not obligated to make sure every gamer who is slightly interested in the demo can get it fast and easy with as little trouble as possible. If they dont want to pamper a bunch of whiney gamers they dont have to.

You are right, it is their product and they CAN do whatever they want because it is their product. I never disputed that. That doesnt mean i have to like what they do and you know what, I AM allowed to voice my opinions and there is nothing they (or you) can do about it. I have calmly and rationally conveyed my disapproval of this sort of tactic. Nothing more. And right now i am defending my point of view in the same manner. I support the movement to complain about this tactic.

One thing you dont seem to grasp yet though is that Activision is out to make money from people. They dont have to pamper their prospective customers but they cant insult them either. And again, limiting a demo release to a few people limits exposure which will probably hurt sales in the end. It just doesnt make sense.

If they want to make some cash by selling exclusitivity to fileplanet thats their choice. If you want the demo you have to play by the rules of the person who is giving the demo.

If you had read my post clearly, you would have seen that i didnt fully blame Activision. I placed more blame on FP for this. I'm sure neither FP or Activision expected this to happen because there have been exclusivity deals before. Exclusivity deals for demo's are just plain dumb. Its almost like buying a newspaper and then having to pay extra for all the advertisements i happened to read in said paper (i know it is not exactly the same but its the best comparison i could come up with so quickly).

"Awww, boohoo. poor thing. NOBODY wants to be subject to stupid ploys AKA smart business moves by greedy people who want to rob you AKA business people who are just doing their job by selling a product. But its their choice, not yours. The world isnt built around your wants, its built around very simple ideas such as, "I have something you want and i expect compensation for letting you have it"

I wont even bother replying to most of this last one. You seem bent on tossing around insults. I dont plan on replying to any more posts made by you on this subject because your arguments are just heated insults. I will comment on the last statement though:

They dont have something i want. THEY have something THEY want ME to pay for. That's how it works.

Enough said.
 
Originally posted by Doom3>hl2
No, i havnt misunderstood anything. Your not buying there kindness, your buying their product. If you want their product then i dont see how your opinion about their compassion for the poor or selfish gamer has anything to do with it. To sell exclusitivity to someone for a short time before giving it freely is a smart way to get a few extra bucks. The ONLY people who would be offended by such an action are cheapskates who dont think they should pay.


Well arent you going to be offended after you shell out the money for nothing more than a graphic-whoring tech demo, that offers no replay value and has to resort to retelling its previous story?
 
Originally posted by Doom3>hl2
No, i havnt misunderstood anything. Your not buying there kindness, your buying their product. If you want their product then i dont see how your opinion about their compassion for the poor or selfish gamer has anything to do with it.
The demo is a free advert. It is therefore in their interests to spread the advert as widely as possible. By giving FP an exclusive deal, they cause potential losses in revenue for all the other game sites. This causes a lot of hostility and ill-will.
To sell exclusitivity to someone for a short time before giving it freely is a smart way to get a few extra bucks. The ONLY people who would be offended by such an action are cheapskates who dont think they should pay.
It's only a smart way if it the gains outweigh the costs. I suspect that isn't going to happen in this case.

Personally, I'm not offended. I can't see any future in the idea. It wouldn't surprise me if Activision are just testing the water.
 
Come on Doom boy. Flame us. Let us know you still love us that much.
 
The big change in distribution came when shareware was introduced. Part of the game was given away FREE without any strings attatched. This was a huge success.

That doesnt mean a company doesnt have the right to sell exclusitivity of their product to someone else for a short time. Its their choice, they can destribute anyway they like.

Activision is stepping backwards. Face it... a demo is a beefed up commercial!

Yea, ok ill buy that. Lets continue.

Would you pay for movie trailers?

No, but you DO pay for the way in which you see the trailer. You either pay for the television on which you veiw it, pay for the movie ticket at the theater and see it, or you pay for your Inet connection and download it. In this case, your not actually paying for the demo, your paying for the subscription to fileplanet. It just so happens that at the time being subscribers can get the demo before its released to the geenral public. Its a perk. So, in reality, seeing a trailer and getting this demo through fileplanet is no different.

Would you pay for radio commercials?

No, but you DO pay for the radio. In this case you are not paying for the demo, noone is selling the demo, but they ARE selling a subscription, and once subscribed you can download the demo if you wish. Again, no different.

Would you pay for magazine ads?

No, but you DO pay for the magazine, just as you pay for the subscription through which you have the option of downloading the demo(viewing the add)

should be free

The price is set by the owner, not by the buyer. People sell water too ;o You can even buy air at an oxygen bar. Its very simple, they have the choice of selling or giving, you have the choice of either buying or not.

Asking me to pay for a subscription for more advertising is the same thing that happened to the cable companies when they started including commercials in the paid content. It didn't make many people happy, and if we don't stop it now, we'll be paying for THEIR advertising.

Your not buying their advertising, your buying the right to use their service. If they want to include adverts into that service, thats their choice. You can either deal with it or cancel your subscription. Its pointless to whine about it.

It's only a smart way if it the gains outweigh the costs. I suspect that isn't going to happen in this case.

Its not your job to decide that for them. They have a team of people more qualified than yourself who are dedicated to making those types of decisions. They can play the game any way they want. All im saying is you people shouldnt be so offended if its not the way your used to playing, or if its not the way you want to play. Does a batter complain that the pitcher didnt throw it down the middle, and threw a curve instead? Be reasonable.
 
would you pay an extra fee to see exclusive previews for upcomeing movies when your already paying for tickets to see the movie in the first place

because thats pretty close to this... a demo is basically a playable advertisement for the game (but there great)
 
Eh, even if they restricted the demo, people would probaly get made and some how leak it, lol. Maybe. Anyways, thankfully I have a fileplanet account. :P
 
Okay guys let's put it this way.

You don't want to pay FP for subscription? Okay then, you don't get a demo until the exclusive period ends. Simple. Don't like it? Get over it, or just don't play the demo at all.
 
I honestly would not be suprised if fileplanet was like new SUPER EXCLUSIVE for those ultra ultra ultra super secret pwnzer files pay 40 additional dollars a month!
 
Back
Top