Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Making Chips for Graphics cards or CPUs is the same. The batch of chips you make may be really good by clocking very high or they may not clock as high. They all vary. It's like a batch of cookies are all different sizes by random. Some rise more than others and some have more chocolate chips.nick_t said:This might've been asked before but I can't read through the whole thread. Why aren't video cards already "overclocked" by the manufacturer to the maximum level which doesn't require extra cooling. Does overclocking have consequences (besides frying your card) such as shortening your video card's life? And, if you have overclocked your 9600 xt without additional cooling, can you please tell me what increase in performance (fps, benchmarks etc.) there has been? Thanks in advance.
P.S. I get 99 fps (lol, can't get 100) on the ATI Tool Cube test. Please refer to this, if possible, when you have oc'ed your card.
This is sort of my opinion on these but the first is good for testing or benchmarking CPUs and not the entire system or sub-system.oMarKs said:Which is the best prime95 torture test to run?
small FFTs (maximum fpu stress, data fits in L2 cache, RAM not tested much)
In-place large FFTs (maximum heat, power consumption, some RAM tested)
or blend (test some of everything, lots of RAM tested)?
The first two seem to be the best as they max out your cpu, and not ram so you can still use the comp whilst its running. Are they OK?
This month, it was particularly difficult to decide between the Single-Channel Socket 754 Athlon 64 and the new Intel Socket 775 for the Performance Overclocking alternative. Despite the massive increase in memory bandwidth that comes with the Dual-Channel 939, the fact remains that the Athlon 64 is not particularly bandwidth-starved compared to recent deep-pipe Intel designs. As you can see in the launch article on Socket 939, this translates into performance of the single-channel 754 Athlon 64 that is only 2% to 9% slower than the new 939 at the same speed. In real terms, this means that a Socket 754, combined with a second-generation Socket 754 motherboard with AGP/PCI locks, is still outperforming Intel's latest and greatest Pentium 4 560 (3.6GHz).
This month's introduction of the DFI LANParty UT nF3 250Gb makes the choice even more difficult as the socket 754 DFI is actually capable of outperforming the 939, if you are willing to run with one DIMM. The new pricing of the 2.4GHz 3700+ at less than $500 also makes this tempting for the Performance overclocker. This is still a very good alternative, but we finally decided to move the Socket 754 to the Value OC recommendation, since it does represent great value in Athlon 64 overclocking.
bryanf445 said:id pm asus
BRODIEMAN2k4 said:What is about the maximum i can overclock a 3.6 ghz P4 processor
On what?blahblahblah said:It depends.
(that is a serious answer)
A little on parts/environment, a bit more on knowledge and a lot on chance...BRODIEMAN2k4 said:On what?
u should oc the fsb, ex, 200 x 15=3ghz or 240x14=3.3ghz lower multiplyer and ocd fsb= better stablity(Ook)Toasted said:Sgt.Igneri: sorry if this is mentioned before, but this thread is getting pretty huge now.. anyway, what should i start overclocking first? the multiplier or fsb? really new to this.. and by the way whats the average temp for a 2500+ barton? I know its different from machine to machine, but mine is 56c without oc.. could it be my mb thats reading it wrong? asus A7N8X Deluxe..
Good choice. The 3000+ (90nm) is probably the best OCer for the price. Just to let you know, the 3200+ would allow you to go even higher as the Multiplyer is 10 instead of 9. You can lower multiplyers but not raise them on Athlon 64's. The 3200+ costs more though.Phisionary said:planning on a AMD athlon 64 3000+ 939 90nm, default clocked 1.8 (i think?) hopefully OC to 2.2 or higher.
The Athlon 64 stock heatsinks are actually pretty good. My Athlon 64 3000+ (S754) is OCed from 2GHz to 2.3GHz on stock cooling with a little Arctic Silver 3.Phisionary said:first.. I'm thinking stock coolers not gonna be good enough, looking for a good quiet cooler. this one: [link to review] looks really cool... very zalman-esque. question is, i was having trouble finding any comparison reviews or round-ups that included this. does anyone know some good sites for this?
They come as individual parts. They are not glued.Phisionary said:second. if I buy a retail CPU, does the stock fan come glued on or anything, or do you have to apply it yourself?... if I replaced the HSF, I'd prefer not to have to scrape crap off the cpu.
All Athlon 64's have the memory controller onboard the CPU so it will be the same for each board. They run by a ratio of the bus. 200MHz (6/6), 166MHz (5/6), 133MHz (4/6) etc. If you want to increase the memory you must increase the bus similar to Intel CPUs. It's a little more complicated though but more rewarding.Phisionary said:third. I was going to get the MSI Neo2 Platinum, and a 1gig PC3200 module. Does the ram run at FSB freq.?, or is their a multiplier setting? For some reason I couldn't find an answer on this one....
There should not be much of an issue getting unmatched sticks. Just check compatiblity with the board. What configuration of memory were you thinking of though? 2 512MB sticks, a 1GB stick? By the way, memory can be very important to obtaining OC results.Phisionary said:Oh, and if I wanted to get myself another gig later and take advantage of dual channel (unless I change my mind and go dual 512), is their any problem getting un-matched modules (provided both meet required specs, latencies, etc.) to run dual channel??
Okay. But I've heard from review that the 3000+ would OC to the same speed as the 3800+, and I hear that the Mobo I've picked is not a limiting factor for this. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the architecture... I'll look into it though. Fair $ more for not a lot though.Asus said:You can lower multiplyers but not raise them on Athlon 64's. The 3200+ costs more though.
Thanks for the advice. I'm not too worried about weight, I very rarely move my computer at all. Should I worry about it more than I do though?That type of design has done well for Zalman but check out the weight on that heatsink. Also it is a little wide so you will have to check if it fits with your board.
Thanks for the advice. I'll check em out. I was looking pointedly in the zalman direction for noise purposes. Unfortunately, I'll be running at least 3 hdd's on this system (possibly including a 10k'er) and they might end up being the noisiest parts in it.Personally I recommend Thermalright heatsinks. They perform very well and do not weight as much (~300g).
good to knowThey come as individual parts. They are not glued.
Okay I get it. FSB runs 200+, and ram runs at a multiplied ratio of that. Apparently people are getting up to, and above, 280MHz FSB with 3000+'s at 9x multiplier. Wow. That's some OCing.They run by a ratio of the bus. 200MHz (6/6), 166MHz (5/6), 133MHz (4/6) etc.
Well, I've been torn up about ram. I pretty much need a gig, but don't want to pay too much. Basically, I'd like the bandwidth of dual channel, but I plan to upgrade to two gigs, when I need it (in a year + a half, maybe), or when it becomes affordable (under $100 for another gig). So, I'm content to wait with a gig until I can get more for cheaper. I hear that running on more than two slots cuts performance cause tyou need to increase, uh... command queueing (or something like that) to a two cycle delay, cuts bandwidth by 15% or something. So, low latency isn't eveything, not for the 100% price markup on quicker memory... but that's a big drop. So I'd like to be able to fit 2 gigs in 2 slots.There should not be much of an issue getting unmatched sticks. Just check compatiblity with the board. What configuration of memory were you thinking of though? 2 512MB sticks, a 1GB stick? By the way, memory can be very important to obtaining OC results.
My full tower has only three FYI. does have six 3+1/2's and a front fan though....Oh and cases. Just so you know, full-tower cases have a full 6 5.25" bays while mid-towers are anywhere from 2-4.
Wonderful links. I bought a case like the first one you linked, over a year ago. I didn't know they still made them. Quite nice, good priceHere is a very popular case design, Chenming case .......Another dragon design from Chieftec ......Lian Li always cost a little more but I love these cases. .....
Anandtech hits 2610MHz on the 3000+ (same as 3500+)Asus said:If you can hit 280FSB then the 3000+ (9x280) would be able to hit 2.5GHz.
Thanks. I'll check it out shortly.Here's the deal with the memory. Read First
The review said 'it looks like they left some empty soda cans inside during assembly' ... sounds good to me :thumbs:see if you can see that it uses large capacitors as those are best.
lol. true, true. my current case stands 18+1/2 inches tall. Big enough for me....
Antec is nice, but most of the models taht look good come with PSU's included. Waste of money for me, quite sure I'll go with a custom. And I like having options as opposed to the few cases that actually come with good PSU's . Cooler master I must have missed. They look quite nice I'll have to look around. I found one that was ~$50, the rest seem a bit pricey so I dunno.ATI4EVER! said:"Cooler Master" and "Antec".
Huh? Did you look? Specs are good; packaging, construction, review, price... Where did this come from??That power supply you have looks crappy.
I've had the no-boot... I'm appreciating them more all the time.Power supplys are very under estimated componenets, infact they are the most important component of your whole rig, if u have a crappy PSU, your other stuff isnt worth anything, especially when the computer wont boot cause of your psu or becasue the bad psu fried your x800xtpe
I looked for reviews on a few of their models (specifically one of the quiet ones) and didn't find much of anything. I rarely buy something that hasn't been reviewed well... or at all.Best PSU manufacturer: http://www.pcpowercooling.com/
I don't do magazines. :|Maximum PC
Not bad... obviously whatever I get I'd like to last a while. I'm still having trouble really making up my mind... leaning toward the 9800 Pro in the 128mb. Does great on todays games, will support my 1280x960 preferred resolution fairly handily (maybe not with AA I dunno), probably will last a couple of years without not running things, and doesn't leave me feeling like someone pulled out my intestines with a meathook, financially speaking. Just a fleshwound.As for videocard, i have a 9600XT i can play hl2 with everything maxxed out including AA and AF 20-40fps.
I missed this.Phisionary said:lastly, someone try and convince me to buy a x800
I'm having trouble rationalizing a vid-card over $250. :x