Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
too easy. do you even know what the wall is? it partitions it to the regular 67 borders and might possibly leave room for a palestinian state. there are few disadvantages to have this wall, and others like it have decreased or completely stopped terrorist attacks in other regions. the wall is a legal and legitimate action.Adrien C said:From what I see, Isarel and their great wall, are taking more and more Palestinian land every day.
the co creater and i got jobs, were all too busy to properly work on it.Adrien C said:What happend to the mod Ghost ?
seinfeldrules said:I can guarantee you this. If Palestine stopped the terrorist attacks against Israel do you think Israel would launch random missle strikes against random civilians? No. Once the terrorism stops, so will Israel. If Israel ceased retaliation then the attacks would only escalate.
ROFL!Lil' Timmy said:ummm.. you guys.. i did some extensive googling.. and it looks like CptStern was right! attached is a picture of a Captain Cuthbert Chuffnell, who was a member of the New York 53rd infantry during the civil war. beside his picture is a photograph of a letter he wrote to his home. the caption is a transcription of the letter since it may be hard to read. i can't believe it....
that was easy to say, you dont know what i read or watch.Adrien C said:You whatch to much cnn.
Stopping the attacks is the only way that can begin. They will never beat Israel using their current methods.Pogrom said:Would the cessation of attacks against the Palestinians lift them out of their misery?
Would it rebuild their towns?
Would it allow them the opportunity to live without fear and to accumulate wealth (which is the only way to truly defeat terrorism)?
Would it give them back the land that Israel stole when they invaded the Palestinian territory?
Would it give them their own state?
seinfeldrules said:Stopping the attacks is the only way that can begin. They will never beat Israel using their current methods.
Sydney Morning Herald said:The boys' deaths brought to at least 24 the number of Palestinian children killed since Israel's "Operation Days of Penitence" began 10 days ago.
Bad analogy but, do you ask Santa for X-Mass presents by punching him in the nose or asking nicely?Why should they have to stop first?
seinfeldrules said:Bad analogy but, do you ask Santa for X-Mass presents by punching him in the nose or asking nicely?
They wont get anywhere by blowing up little kids.
Israel didnt get its land by beating up on everyone. Are you kidding me? The UN established the land after WWII because of the mass sympathy for Jews.Hey, Israel got a country out of it. That's one hell of an incentive.
seinfeldrules said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_attack
Israel didnt get its land by beating up on everyone. Are you kidding me? The UN established the land after WWII because of the mass sympathy for Jews.
seinfeldrules said:You bring up Iraq, yet you didnt have the courage to save 25 million people? You may not have agreed with the WMD stance, but for Godssake the man was a brutal murderer. You could have done it for the Iraqi people.
I think this one applies for 99% of the people in this thread, from BOTH sides.CB | Para said:You need to unplug your tv and learn to think for yourself.
Direwolf said:I think this one applies for 99% of the people in this thread, from BOTH sides.
gh0st said:ive seen it, the ninnies from school who are like mega vegans passed out the pamphlets. it just made me hungry, and i made sure to eat extra kfc that day, just for them.
K e r b e r o s said:Then I have to ask...who prompted the discussion of the Middle East?
Lag compensation? Like a built in delay?CB | Para said:It always comes up, we could be discussing lag compensation in RTCW and someone will somehow manage to bring up the subject of Iraq.
Foxtrot said:Lag compensation? Like a built in delay?
I never said we went in soley because of the Iraqi people. What I did say was that France and the other countries should have supported us because of the Iraqi people's dilemma.For the Iraqi people?...
Yeah and what a great job they've done so far. Great ****ing job
Don't be so naive. You honestly believe the current US administration went into Iraq to save the Iraqi people? You need to unplug your tv and learn to think for yourself.
ComradeBadger said:Adrien C France had their own reasons for holding back, nothing altruistic.
seinfeldrules said:I never said we went in soley because of the Iraqi people. What I did say was that France and the other countries should have supported us because of the Iraqi people's dilemma.
The Iraqi people werent as big of a motivation as WMD, that is obvious, but Bush has claimed it as a reason even before we went in. To say it wasnt taken into consideration is ridiculous.No and no, because at first, you never did it for the Iraqi people, you did it for "your safety", you wen't to look for "wmd" (we of course know that it was a scam)
spookymooky said:I thought everyone knew that.