stumbled upon a bad bad persons wireless network. what to do?

Status
Not open for further replies.
marksmanHL2 :) said:
We have heard that it looks like the guy has underage porn on his computer and you are saying that we shouldnt do ANYTHING because we "could be wrong"

Well, if you can walk around in the guy's computer as you please, it shouldn't be difficult to confirm it 100% (unless, of course, it's so vague that it can't be confirmed).
 
Seriously, some people are so damn imoral it makes me sick sometimes.

I'm gona try and stop posting in this thread now before I get too pissed off and get myself banned.
 
cybernoid, you have sooooo many people disagreeing with you, take a second and think; "if i have more people disagreeing with my views than agreeing, could it possibly be...*gasp*, i'm not as credible as i once thought i was....."
 
Sai said:
cybernoid, you have sooooo many people disagreeing with you, take a second and think; "if i have more people disagreeing with my views than agreeing, could it possibly be...*gasp*, i'm not as credible as i once thought i was....."

A number of people can claim one thing and be wrong. A large group of people claiming that x is y doesn't automagically mean that x really is y.
 
ok horse is getting tired of being beaten to death ...move on guys
 
Cybernoid can I clean something up...

If a man has got indecent pictures of children on his PC, then he should be questioned by the authorities to determine how and why he obtained this material?

Do you think that this man would need some therapy or mental help?

Now the fact the man in question does posess indecent pictures of children is not a debate here, it's a fact.

PoseyJmac's intrusion into the network was out of curiosity, and brought this matter to light. The fact these files were found by an unauthorised intrusion into a network does not nullify the fact that this man needs to be caught and brought to justice.

It doesn't take an IQ over 50 to come to this conclusion.
 
Pobz said:
Cybernoid can I clean something up...

If a man has got indecent pictures of children on his PC, then he should be questioned by the authorities to determine how and why he obtained this material?

Do you think that this man would need some therapy or mental help?

Of course.

Now the fact the man in question does posess indecent pictures of children is not a debate here, it's a fact.

Is it? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "fact" here is that the person "apparently" has "underage" pictures on his system. Pretty vague.
 
the fact here is that PoseyJmac saw these pictures with his own eyes, classed them as "underage" and continued with his intentions to "bust the guy".

Now do you think PoseyJmac is such an idiot that he can't tell the difference between a child and an 18 year old?

Stop fighting such stupid arguments you can't win, and find some other forums to troll.
 
Cybernoid said:
Of course.



Is it? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "fact" here is that the person "apparently" has "underage" pictures on his system. Pretty vague.



Your argueing to be right. Not because you think we are wrong. Thats what I hate about this arguement.

You blatently dont give a shit whatever happens but are argueing just to satisfy your thirst for arguement and just to annoy us.


Seriously, grow up.
 
Pobz said:
the fact here is that PoseyJmac saw these pictures with his own eyes, classed them as "underage" and continued with his intentions to "bust the guy".

Sorry, too vague.

Now do you think PoseyJmac is such an idiot that he can't tell the difference between a child and an 18 year old?

I really don't know, because the difference is sometimes impossible to tell. Maybe jmac has supernatural abilities.

Stop fighting such stupid arguments you can't win, and find some other forums to troll.

The troll argument, truly the last refuge of the incompetent.
 
The way a certain staff member acted in this situation has made me quite pissed at the way of moderation this forum and the channel is undergoing currently, which is normally not tolerable among the most forums I've been a member and moderator of. This could be compared to an amateur taking care of the button to an atomic bomb.
Having a situation where people are questioning the staff/moderator's competence has never worked, and never will work.

I hope you guys will realise it some day when you drag your noses out of their arses.
 
Cybernoid said:
Sorry, too vague.



I really don't know, because the difference is sometimes impossible to tell. Maybe jmac has supernatural abilities.



The troll argument, truly the last refuge of the incompetent.



You are a troll, at least in this thread. Your argueing for arguements sake.
 
marksmanHL2 :) said:
Your argueing to be right. Not because you think we are wrong. Thats what I hate about this arguement.

I'm arguing because it seems to me that the evidence is too vague. This is a serious matter, after all. A person's life can be ruined by false accusations.
 
Anyway, until the matter becomes less vague, I don't think that I have anything new to say.
 
Cybernoid said:
I'm arguing because it seems to me that the evidence is too vague. This is a serious matter, after all. A person's life can be ruined by false accusations.


Sorry, but if I thought a guy had pedofillia on his computer I would report them even if it meant it might ruin his life.

Because it would be much worse if he did have it than if he didnt in my opinion. Especially if the guy had kids of his own.
 
Cybernoid said:
Anyway, until the matter becomes less vague, I don't think that I have anything new to say.
hmmmm.
I hope so.
 
SFLUFAN said:
- you will more than likely have to get your hands dirty.

Besides your not 100% sure that he has kid porn. I know it would do damage to your head but unless you know for sure, you could get in more trouble than him. And whos to say that you didn't upload those file to clear your own name.

tuff stuff man. Drop a letter at his door and let him know that you know what he is up to. And if he doesn't stop, the authorities will be contacted.
 
You were testing your new WLAN and connected, to your supprise the lan you connected to wasen't the one you remember and you looked around thinking there was somekinda error. Suddenly you find these images and realice this can't be your wlan, someone else using a wlan must be the owner. You call the cops and tell this about this.
Right ?...

Ps, you know very little about computers and could barely install the wlan.
 
Pobz said:
Now the fact the man in question does posess indecent pictures of children is not a debate here, it's a fact.

but then i found filenames of kiddie porn. now i didnt look at the pictures, but the FILENAMES were a giveaway and were in a separate folder other than the 'family pics' folder

Sorry but in a court of law assumptions get you nowhere.
 
Yakuza, you're missing the post after that in which he returns to the scene, opens some images and tells us all that they are indeed pornographic pictures of underage children.

Please just read the threads entirely before contributing bullsh!te...
 
Pobz said:
Yakuza, you're missing the post after that in which he returns to the scene, opens some images and tells us all that they are indeed pornographic pictures of underage children.

Please just read the threads entirely before contributing bullsh!te...

Can you quote it or tell me the number of the post?
 
MapE said:
You were testing your new WLAN and connected, to your supprise the lan you connected to wasen't the one you remember and you looked around thinking there was somekinda error. Suddenly you find these images and realice this can't be your wlan, someone else using a wlan must be the owner. You call the cops and tell this about this.
Right ?...

Ps, you know very little about computers and could barely install the wlan.


lieing about it won't get anyone anywhere...
 
You have a very short memory Cybernoid... you know damn well what he said.

He's been talking with people in PM also, stating there is no doubt how underage the children in the pictures were. Stop making arguments where there are no grounds for debate.

What do you want, a graphic description of the photos? You people are sick, even getting in the way of the correct course of action or trying to convince people that child pornography isn't an offence. Seriously, just shut up.
 
I say, u must confirm a sighting. So just because something is labeled a sexual innuendo doesnt mean thats what it is. So just choose one pic, look at it. See if its the real deal and then turn him in.
If you just say, O i think there might have been child porn on this guys comp. They will ask if u saw it for yourself and are a witness. If you can't confirm its the real deal then some joker could be put through a lot of shit because you thought he had child porn.
(to lazy to read entire thread. if said already then dont pay attention to this post.)
 
Mr ComradeBadger sir...please don't close it...It is a mighty educational thread if you look past the flames
 
Please do close it, the correct course of action is obvious and this whole thread is now just a pointless flame war. What good can come out of this?
 
Pobz said:
You have a very short memory Cybernoid... you know damn well what he said.

Can you or can you not provide the message in question?

He's been talking with people in PM also, stating there is no doubt how underage the children in the pictures were. Stop making arguments where there are no grounds for debate.

And I've been talking to Jimmy Hoffa who convinced me that I'm right.

What do you want, a graphic description of the photos?

Why not? It would sure make this matter more clear.

You people are sick, even getting in the way of the correct course of action or trying to convince people that child pornography isn't an offence. Seriously, just shut up.

I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed that child pornography is not illegal.
 
I'll reopen it with PoseyJmac's permission. But this is just going round in circles.

What we know so far:

PoseyJmac stumbled on an unprotected network (this is a criminal act)
He discovered some oddly-named files he believed to be child pornography
He later, on our advice, checked one of the files. The subjects appeared to be under the age of 18.
Possesion of child pornography is a crime, one of far greater magnitude than the crime of stumbling onto a network.

Draw your own conclusions, but in my humble opinion, he should report this as suspicious, and then leave the police to deal with it. Cybernoid is right, false accusations do ruin people's lives. Thats why it would be essential to tell the police that you believe him to be in possesion of the aformentioned illegal pornography, and leave it at that. Let them do the rest..

But that's just my opinion. It is not the word of god or halflife2.net
 
poseyjmac said:
found pics that appear to have underage content. now we want to bust this guy

This and the PMs with others leaves no doubt as to the content of the guys PC. So what do you want to argue about?
 
if he watch's it, he will too get into trouble, since its labeled kiddie porn, he shud know what it is, which he does, so he shud not see if its real or not, let the police find out.
 
Pobz said:
This and the PMs with others leaves no doubt as to the content of the guys PC. So what do you want to argue about?

Ah, that post. I've already commented on it.
 
heres an update.

im just trying to go about this the right way, not trying to rush things for the guy's sake and for mine. ive been reading up on a bunch of laws and other material, and ill be trying to resolve this hopefully soon. since ive already gotten in the system, it wont hurt to do a little more homework before making any drastic decisions. but dont worry if there is something wrong here, ill report it. i just want to go about it carefully.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top