Terrorism VS. Support of Bush

Status
Not open for further replies.
No Limit said:
I'm not starting anything with you, I am telling you that there nothing I can say to him that would sound more mature as something more mature would use logic and he won't understand that.
See...taking cheap shots like that.
 
K e r b e r o s said:
THAT YOU DONT ****ING ANSWER YOURSELF?

Why the swearing, duder? Smoke some weed... Or get laid... Or something...

*Rolls dubey over to Kerberos*
 
*Rolls dubey over to Kerberos*

Thanks man! I should just drink your blood ... [Because, if I technically drunk your blood Absinthe, I would start to hallucinate]
 
K e r b e r o s said:
No Limit, he just said not to ****ing start with him ... dont do it. Trons crazy. ...
Sarcasm? :|

It's not crazy...I haven't got sleep yet..so I'm not in a good mood. :(
 
You talk about logic and yet neither of you seem to use it, this thread has become completely off topic tunred into a childish game of name calling and I think it would be in the best intrests of this fourm if the topic was closed before it gets out of hand.


If not, then please go back to discussing the thread starters point.
 
K e r b e r o s said:
Happiness?

You need some of that. You also need more sleep! :D
I wish, but my brain is in overdrive right now and I can't seem to sleep.
 
seinfeldrules said:
You're not a mod, why do you always try to act like one?
So?Doesn't mean I can't say that.

How's that acting like one?I'm telling you stop because I've already talked to bliink and shes at the point of banning instead of giving out warnings.Shes getting tired of this forum and so is the other mods.

So yea listen to what I say.
 
seinfeldrules said:
You're not a mod, why do you always try to act like one?

hes been acting a bit strange alllll day :upstare:

jus been shooting his mouth off at me in the other thread too. tut tut , lol
 
KoreBolteR said:
hes been acting a bit strange alllll day :upstare:

jus been shooting his mouth off at me in the other thread too. tut tut , lol
Refer to what I posted above.

I shot my mouth off at you because of stupid generalizations that you made.
 
Tr0n said:
Refer to what I posted above.

I shot my mouth off at you because of stupid generalizations that you made.

nm, but i seem to remember you flaming me about my one word spelling mistake.

which was "youve" instead of "You've".

that was a cheap shot, hehe :E :thumbs:

EDIT: read a book, thatll send you to sleep :p
 
Seriously tron you goof off half the time, then yell at others for doing the same.


Back to topic I guess, I really dont think that it is fair to distinguish about who votes for Bush based on terrorism. Do you not think that people in 'red states' dont want to protect those living in more highly dangerous locations? I sure as hell know I do.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Seriously tron you goof off half the time, then yell at others for doing the same.


Back to topic I guess, I really dont think that it is fair to distinguish about who votes for Bush based on terrorism. Do you not think that people in 'red states' dont want to protect those living in more highly dangerous locations? I sure as hell know I do.
Yea I goof off in OFF-TOPIC.

Anyways I noticed something...some of the major cities in the south voted for Kerry while the rural areas voted for Bush.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Seriously tron you goof off half the time, then yell at others for doing the same.


Back to topic I guess, I really dont think that it is fair to distinguish about who votes for Bush based on terrorism. Do you not think that people in 'red states' dont want to protect those living in more highly dangerous locations? I sure as hell know I do.

im just wondering, do you think exit polls are innacurate?, because i do. :O
 
KoreBolteR said:
im just wondering, do you think exit polls are innacurate?, because i do. :O
All poles are innaccurate to some degree.It's just how much is the question...
 
im just wondering, do you think exit polls are innacurate?, because i do.

Exit polls predicted Kerry was going to win by a minor landslide on election day. Nuff said.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Seriously tron you goof off half the time, then yell at others for doing the same.


Back to topic I guess, I really dont think that it is fair to distinguish about who votes for Bush based on terrorism. Do you not think that people in 'red states' dont want to protect those living in more highly dangerous locations? I sure as hell know I do.
But look that isn't the point, I'm sure they don't want a terrorist attack as everyone else in this countre (Republican or Democrat). Republicans talk about terrorism ALL THE TIME when the fact is it is the blue states that are living with the threat every day; not some Republicans from South Carolina. This leads me to my main point, the only real reason Bush won the election was because of moral values, and I believe that reason is wrong.
 
seinfeldrules said:
Exit polls predicted Kerry was going to win by a minor landslide on election day. Nuff said.
That doesn't matter. They were wrong by only 3%. So if you want give or take 3% from the issues poll.
 
No Limit said:
But look that isn't the point, I'm sure they don't want a terrorist attack as everyone else in this countre (Republican or Democrat). Republicans talk about terrorism ALL THE TIME when the fact is it is the blue states that are living with the threat every day; not some Republicans from South Carolina. This leads me to my main point, the only real reason Bush won the election was because of moral values, and I believe that reason is wrong.
Well most other southerners I know said that was one of the main reasons why they voted Bush.

Mainly moral values with terrorism coming in second.Weird thing is most people around here don't even care about the terrorist "threat".
 
Tr0n said:
Well most other southerners I know said that was one of the main reasons why they voted Bush.

Mainly moral values with terrorism coming in second.Weird thing is most people around here don't even care about the terrorist "threat".
Exactly my point.
 
No Limit said:
That doesn't matter. They were wrong by only 3%. So if you want give or take 3% from the issues poll.

doesnt matter, it was still wrong :p
 
The exit polls were wrong by 6.5 percent, this is unacceptable in presidential elections.
 
Sainku said:
The exit polls were wrong by 6.5 percent, this is unacceptable in presidential elections.
I think you are thinking of the leaked ones, the official ones were wrong by only 3%. However, don't quote me; I want to make sure.
 
You are correct sir, and even if they are not incorrect, i think legally they must allow for a margin of error.
 
Well, put it this way:

If the polls were always right we wouldn't need elections because the outcome was already decided.

There's so many factors you'd be a fool to suggest a poll could make an exact prediction.
Statistics is an inherantly (and actually by definition) uncertain science.

Polls are just used as models to gain some idea of the expected outcome. Which is the same as everything in this world.
 
No Limit said:
Exactly my point.
Now what I don't understand is how media outlets say one of the big reasons why bush was voted into office was because of him dealing with terrorism and all that crap.

Thats why I bearly watch tv anymore....
 
KoreBolteR said:
doesnt matter, it was still wrong :p

Everybody accepts that polls are subject to a margin of error.

Everybody except for you, so it seems.

Stop knocking over stick men, Kore. Nobody has stated that polls are completely accurate. So, if you really want to be a bitch about it, yeah you can say that they're wrong. But polls have never been used with the intent of achieving 100% factual accuracy. They give a rough idea. An estimation. An answer that could possibly speak for the average citizen.

If you have a more effective means of obtaining this information, I'd like to hear it.
 
It was the exit polls....so don't expect them to be right anyways.
 
Absinthe said:
Everybody accepts that polls are subject to a margin of error.

Everybody except for you, so it seems.

Stop knocking over stick men, Kore. Nobody has stated that polls are completely accurate. So, if you really want to be a bitch about it, yeah you can say that they're wrong. But polls have never been used with the intent of achieving 100% factual accuracy. They give a rough idea. An estimation. An answer that could possibly speak for the average citizen.

If you have a more effective means of obtaining this information, I'd like to hear it.

yeh, dont do exit polls :E
 
But look that isn't the point, I'm sure they don't want a terrorist attack as everyone else in this countre (Republican or Democrat). Republicans talk about terrorism ALL THE TIME when the fact is it is the blue states that are living with the threat every day; not some Republicans from South Carolina. This leads me to my main point, the only real reason Bush won the election was because of moral values, and I believe that reason is wrong.

Moral values play a big part in politics. Not only that, but Kerry also agreed with Bush on both Iraq and the War on Terror, he just must not have put his point across clearly enough.
 
So moral values (aka bible thumping) and terrorism (something that doesn't affect them) were more imporant than all those issues. Do you now see my point and will you address it? This has

First of all, why are moral values bible thumping? How about not wanting your children to steal. That is a moral value. Do only religious fanatics want their kids to be good people?

Second of all, the actual poll listed it as "values" plain and simple. Nothing about gay marriage. Nothing about religion. People should no longer hold values in your opinion?

Terrorism doesn't affect them? Why don't you try looking up the percentages of millitary servicemen as a whole of each state. Terrorism affected everyone, whether you live in NY, the US or any other country. Your implication is that Bush only won becuase of fanatical religious rednecks. People thinking like you are the reason Bush was able to be elected twice.
 
Terrorism affected me....but not to the point that I'm scared shitless or that I give a damn.
 
Terrorism affected me....but not to the point that I'm scared shitless or that I give a damn.

Terrorism affected me....

but I dont give a damn about it


Huh?
 
GhostFox said:
Your implication is that Bush only won becuase of fanatical religious rednecks. People thinking like you are the reason Bush was able to be elected twice.

And because our infinite knowledge is lost upon the fanatical religious rednecks, we are going to secede from the union and go chill out next to Canada.

Then, maybe when we feel like it, we'll bomb them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top