Topless Swedish bathers

Most mammals don;t have swollen breast all year round. Humans have evolved this trait for sexual attraction, some theorize its because of the most common position humans have sex, and big round boobies are similar to big round butts.

Its all very complex, the point being that uncovered boobs make men feel randy.




















I say we go protest in support of these feminists.

I know I'll enjoy witnessing this equality in action. And I'm sure those feminists will feel all the more equal.

:cheese:
 
Would we really want to kill off our fascination with boobs?

Really?

They're just so fantastic.
 
I don't think women would just start going around topless all the time just as men don't. However, I think they should be allowed to as men are.
 
Men obviously have a stronger sexual desire for tits than women do for man-chest.


Alright, for starters, there's a very just reason why women wear tops and men don't. Breasts are biologically created for two reasons.
-1. To feed the offspring
-2. To incite sexual attraction in males. I.E: getting a mate.

you know damn well that most guys drool over tits and ass. Why? Because tits and ass were created partly to attract men.
Click to expand...

Proof? That's like saying dogs get turned on by other dogs' 'tits'.. We just like them because they've always been covered up, it's a bit of mystery for us. I remember way back when (more like 3 years ago), there was a red bull commercial and it showed Adam and Eve, both has leaves on their crotches, and the womans boobs were uncovered. This is day-time TV, too.

You don't often hear of women talking about men's chest area NEARLY as much do you? "Oh damn, look at that chest, it's all flat and sexy, man those hairy nipples"
Click to expand...
They don't say it like that, and they don't talk about it nearly as much as guys do, but they still do.
So the reason why women wear tops- To reduce the strong sexual desire men have for tits.
Click to expand...
Again - Proof!
I'd like to take another quote from these feminists-
"We want our breasts to be as 'normal' and desexualized as men's, so that we too can pull off our shirts at football matches,"

-I am sorry, but breasts will never be "desexualized" because that is partly what they are there for. That's like saying "I hope one day my cock can be desexualized, and I will be allowed to pull it out in front of people without them being offended"
Click to expand...
Men have a penis, girls have a vagina. Men have nipples, girls have boobs. (basically big nipples).
Not to mention that entire quote is probably one of the most slutty and contradicting things I have heard in the context of women's equality.
Click to expand...
How is it slutty? Sexing up everyone you meet is slutty, that's just exposure.

Granted, if we lived in a utopia where men never sexually harassed women, and we were always nice and respectful, then yeah women could go topless, in fact everyone could probably be naked.

But guess what, this is the real world, where dressing like a slut gets you sexually harassed. So why is not wearing a top logical? It's not.
Click to expand...
This, I agree with, it'll take a while to get used to seeing women walking around with their shirts off, because we're so used to seeing them with shirts on, so there will be an increase (imo) in rape/sexual harassment.




See, even if we pass a law saying that women can go topless, feminists will just complain about how guys are staring at their tits more. Because they always have to complain about something.
Click to expand...
It's weird how North America (Canada + US) is supposed to be free, yet we have ALOT of restrictions of our freedom..



And here is one of my favorite quotes from this article- "Our aim is to start a debate about the unwritten social and cultural rules that sexualize and discriminate against the female body,"

CONTRADICTION?
You know why the female body is "discriminated" against? Because you bitches dress like ****ing SLUTS!
Click to expand...
Again, exposure is not dressing like a slut, wearing a tiny skirt and fish-net shit is slutty..

It's a two way street, wave a steak in front of a dog and he's going to bite.
-And you expect showing your tits to everyone is going to help gain you "sexual respect"?

The sad thing is how selfish feminists are. There are terrible things going on in this world, yet all they are concerned about is "women". What ever happened to being concerned about other people too? People of different sexes, races, etc?
Click to expand...
Agreed.
In this sense they are completely hypocritical, pointing out how selfish and cruel men are, yet at the same time all they care about are themselves.
Click to expand...
Yup.



I'd also like to add, MEN CAN HAVE BREASTS FOR FEEDING THEIR YOUNG, TOO. It just takes a little longer for their breasts to develop, because they aren't equipped for it right away.. But still.. Men nipples and female tits are THE SAME THING!

(I didn't want to search too much for this on google (it's weird), but you can if you want, here is something I found)

Proof you're wrong.



This is probably the best and most constructive post I've ever made!
 
Dog-- said:

Proof you're wrong.
Click to expand...

"He began telling himself that he would lactate, and within a week, one of his breasts swelled up and milk began dripping out."

""Obviously there's something physiologically wrong with David." The fact that David had willed himself to do this, did not impress him. We knew, however, that this was yet another example of the power of the mind."

No. No. No. I am sorry but no. No. No. Just no. Not. Uh-uh- Nope.
 
Like I said, it's probably not the best source, but it's not something I really WANT to research.. That link looked good enough from my 5 minutes on google.
 
All reasons why sensible people say that it should be illegal
 
it would be amusing if a mod posted a poll for the thread
 
Dog-- said:
We just like them because they've always been covered up, it's a bit of mystery for us.
Click to expand...

Wrong. I've been married for 5 years, and sleeping with the same woman for 7. Naturally, since we live together (and with no other roommates), I see my wife's breasts all the time, and I still don't get tired of seeing them. In fact, I very often have to ask her to cover up because I get all randy and she isn't in the mood.

They don't say it like that, and they don't talk about it nearly as much as guys do, but they still do.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter. A man's chest never has, and never will have the same sexual connotations that a woman's does.

(basically big nipples).
Click to expand...
Have you ever actually seen a woman's breasts?

This, I agree with, it'll take a while to get used to seeing women walking around with their shirts off, because we're so used to seeing them with shirts on, so there will be an increase (imo) in rape/sexual harassment.
Click to expand...

We aren't talking about women randomly walking around topless here. You don't usually see men walking topless just because its socially acceptable in certain places. If women are topless at a pool (which, I'll remind you, is what this topic IS about), there are more likely than not going to be other people around.

It's weird how North America (Canada + US) is supposed to be free, yet we have ALOT of restrictions of our freedom..
Click to expand...

That's a completely different conversation, but I'll diffuse the point you're attempting to make by saying the US and Canada ARE free, but not anarchy. People can't just do whatever they want.

I'd also like to add, MEN CAN HAVE BREASTS FOR FEEDING THEIR YOUNG, TOO. It just takes a little longer for their breasts to develop, because they aren't equipped for it right away.. But still.. Men nipples and female tits are THE SAME THING!

(I didn't want to search too much for this on google (it's weird), but you can if you want, here is something I found)

Proof you're wrong.
Click to expand...

Not going to bother.

This is probably the best and most constructive post I've ever made!
Click to expand...

Sadly, that doesn't say much about your other posts :LOL:
 
Argh! Previous thread hadn't quoted properly!

Basically... I believe it should be illegal, merely for there own sake. However responsible a man believes he is... his self-control will fly out the window when faced with a scarcely clad woman.
 
Here's a picture the women that bathed topless (taken from a Swedish news site):
HRObrost384_102331a.jpg


So yeah, not exactly any beauties.
 
I believe the reason they are doing this is that they dont have enough cases of sexual harassment or sexism anymore to justify a feminist movement, and thus they are trying to get allowed to be half naked so that they can complain about men ogling them just because their tits are hanging out.
 
Wrong. I've been married for 5 years, and sleeping with the same woman for 7. Naturally, since we live together (and with no other roommates), I see my wife's breasts all the time, and I still don't get tired of seeing them. In fact, I very often have to ask her to cover up because I get all randy and she isn't in the mood.
Click to expand...

National Geographic is a good example. Y'know how there are always topless women in those magazines? In all those tribe/primitive places, women don't wear shirts, but I bet you'd barely ever see a guy with a boner staring at them, because it's the norm there, so they don't care, they see them all the time. Also - some guys are different then others, but this is a big reason (they are always covered up).
It doesn't matter. A man's chest never has, and never will have the same sexual connotations that a woman's does.
Click to expand...
Again, the tribe thing.. They could have the same sexual connotations, but since everyone covers up their boobs, it won't happen.
Have you ever actually seen a woman's breasts?
Click to expand...
Bah, you know what I meant.
We aren't talking about women randomly walking around topless here. You don't usually see men walking topless just because its socially acceptable in certain places. If women are topless at a pool (which, I'll remind you, is what this topic IS about), there are more likely than not going to be other people around.
Click to expand...
I'm just using random topless women as an example..
That's a completely different conversation, but I'll diffuse the point you're attempting to make by saying the US and Canada ARE free, but not anarchy. People can't just do whatever they want.
Click to expand...
Manhunt 2 is a good example here.
Not going to bother.
Click to expand...
Because I've got proof for that one, and you are wrong!
Sadly, that doesn't say much about your other posts :LOL:
Click to expand...
Yea, I'm pretty useless on HL2.net.. But still!
 
Dog-- said:
National Geographic is a good example. Y'know how there are always topless women in those magazines? In all those tribe/primitive places, women don't wear shirts, but I bet you'd barely ever see a guy with a boner staring at them, because it's the norm there, so they don't care, they see them all the time. Also - some guys are different then others, but this is a big reason (they are always covered up).
Again, the tribe thing.. They could have the same sexual connotations, but since everyone covers up their boobs, it won't happen.
Click to expand...

What you see in National Geographic articles about tribal Africa is hardly representative of the realities in civilized culture. You can't use that as a comparison to Sweden.

Bah, you know what I meant.
Click to expand...
No, not really... breasts are not just oversized nipples, they're made of lots of other things.

I'm just using random topless women as an example..
Click to expand...
Well, the debate isn't about random topless women...

Manhunt 2 is a good example here.
Click to expand...
Er... so agreed then?

Because I've got proof for that one, and you are wrong!
Click to expand...
Maybe on a technicality - based on what I've read, its hardly a reasonable solution.
 
What you see in National Geographic articles about tribal Africa is hardly representative of the realities in civilized culture. You can't use that as a comparison to Sweden.
Click to expand...
People are people. People in Africa have the same sex drive as you. I don't know what your trying to say here, I can't use them as an example because they aren't from Sweden, or aren't civilized? Like I said.. People are People, they are the same as you or me.

No, not really... breasts are not just oversized nipples, they're made of lots of other things.
Click to expand...
Well apparently men get get the same things as womans breasts are made of, so they are the same, one just has to develop under certain circumstances.

Well, the debate isn't about random topless women...
Click to expand...
True..
Er... so agreed then?
Click to expand...
You said we are free, but what's it free about banning a game because a bunch of dumb-ass parents don't want their kids seeing blood? They force their shit on the rest of us, when all they have to do is be responsible and not buy the game, simple as that. The rest of us get a part of a freedom taken away because of some stupid bitches..

Maybe on a technicality - based on what I've read, its hardly a reasonable solution.
Click to expand...
TBH, I didn't read that whole thing (it's a creepy thing to read about), but do a bit more research on it, it's not a technicality, we can develop the same breasts, we just need to meet certain requirements first (nursing child).
 
They should be allowed to do show their breasts in public. It's becuase it's still culturally a mans world that views women as sexual objects that they can't.
 
Nevertheless, i still reckon most feminists are just stupid.
 
zombieturtle01 said:
femenists are so ****ing retarded. I know my opinion wont count in this thread, but the reason women cover up that area is because part of the reason boobs exist is to insite sexual attraction, just like a vagina or ass.

Boobs however, quite obviously insite more sexual attraction to most men than most other body parts (I.E: legs)

I like boobs as much as the next guy, but jesus ****ing christ femenists are never happy. Because if we bypass letting women go topless, the next thing they will complain about is men staring at their tits. Pick one or the other bitches, but which ever one you choose, don't ****ing complain about it.
Click to expand...

You do realize that your reasoning is exactly the same as the reasoning used by Muslim extremists in getting women to cover their faces, right?

Boobs don't exist to incite sexual attraction. They exist to give milk to babies. Men just happen to be attracted to them because it gives us an evolutionary advantage to have a woman who can give milk to our children.

Women could use your same half-assed logic to tell men to cover up when swimming.
 
Krynn72 said:
lol, fail

Also, the rule is to cover up reproductive organs, not to wear a top. Therefore these feminists fail.
Click to expand...

Men have the same breast tissue as women you know. Besides, breasts aren't "reproductive organs".
 
Breasts and Nipples, everybody has them...

Its a shame that 75% of the male population get a hard-on just by the site of a bare nipple

Hell, sucking on them ain't even sexual (though its used in that practice)
 
sea said:
I don't want women to be able to display their bare breasts in public. As a male I have enough trouble keeping my eyes to myself (frankly I find it annoying as hell to instinctively have my gaze jump to anything female that comes near), and the ads that are plastered outside everywhere are pretty bad too.

Whether or not women like it, breasts do have a sexual connotation in our society. It's not "inequality" to make women cover them (they can get away with less clothing than more, anyways) up, but done out of cultural necessity. Furthermore, even if you did allow women to go topless wherever they please, I highly doubt that most women would actually do it - in fact, probably fewer than 1% of them would. It'd be uncomfortable and attract unwanted attention from everyone. The fact that some ****ing idiot had to go and find a photo of the women to ogle and "rate" just proves it.

I can understand if the women want to change the cultural norms, but it's going to be a lot harder than just calling discrimination and hoping to pass some law based on that. If it ever does happen, it will be hundreds of years from now, that's for sure.
Click to expand...

I agree that our culture has not advanced far enough to allow something like that, but I believe women should have the same privileges as men when it comes to nudity in public places.

After all, in the Middle East, womens faces are seen as inherently sexual, as well as their hair. This same argument is used in almost every culture to oppress women, and the men use those same arguments with the same amount of reason and the same feelings that we have towards public nudity, only to a greater extent.
 
sea said:
The difference is that we aren't oppressing women by not allowing them to publicly display their breasts, while in the Middle East and whatnot, their goal largely is to oppress women.
Click to expand...
They don't say they're oppressing women, they say they're preventing rape.
 
I think that the feminists are right.



Men should have to wear tops.
 
if they get to have their tits out, i should be allowed to walk around with my dong hanging out
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

CptStern
Say 'Hebbo' to Tarvuism
Replies
7
Views
750
Gunner
G
thenerdguy
TheNerdNews: Protest To Aim At Equal Topless Rights
Replies
8
Views
2K
mortiz
mortiz
Back
Top