Sidewinder
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 0
uhmmm concealed firearms permit mmuch?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I can hate rich people all I want, that doesn't mean I'm poor. There's not a magic boundary "Rich" | "Poor"...there's a lot of gray area there.Did you guys not see the video where he condemned rich kids with their "trust funds?"
I can hate rich people all I want, that doesn't mean I'm poor. There's not a magic boundary "Rich" | "Poor"...there's a lot of gray area there.
Even so, I know plenty of poor people that don't go on killing sprees.
He. Was. Nuts.
End of story.
The News said:The affadavit said the suspect in the shootings, who has been named as 23-year-old Cho Seung-Hui, was believed to have multiple firearms, including but not limited to Walther P22 and Glock 9mm handguns.
...
In another affidavit, police say they are seeking information from Tech's computer servers for Cho's two known e-mail accounts -- [email protected], his school account, and [email protected], an account that was used in the purchase of a gun. The latter account was used as recently as February, the affidavit says.
If you support guns, that's great, as long as you support tight restrictions. Personally, I think that, if your caught with a gun outside in public (that includes in your car), you should be banned from owning any firearm for the rest of your life.
He was being sarcastic. So it was a contribution to the thread.
...I'm pretty sure. You dont' know, with Numbers.
True - with any other poster I would be confident that was a sarcastic, acid, hyperbolic response to Baal, undermining his assertion by taking it to its logical conclusion (not very well I'll grant you)...but with Numbers, who can tell?
And people are resources.... you never waste resources.
Then that means the only people who would take guns outside would be criminals.If you support guns, that's great, as long as you support tight restrictions. Personally, I think that, if your caught with a gun outside in public (that includes in your car), you should be banned from owning any firearm for the rest of your life.
But if you just bought a gun how are you supposed to bring it home?If you support guns, that's great, as long as you support tight restrictions. Personally, I think that, if your caught with a gun outside in public (that includes in your car), you should be banned from owning any firearm for the rest of your life.
Then that means the only people who would take guns outside would be criminals.
So now you have a situation where criminals readily use weapons in crime, but other people are not allowed to carry guns to protect themselves.
That makes the criminals job alot easier and makes it easier for a psycho to kill alot more people before someone can stop him.
I only speak for myself, but if I was a bystander in a robbery I'd prefer that everyone just cooperated with the gunman and gave him all their money rather than some dumbass hero pulling a gun out and a bunch of people being killed that wouldn't be otherwise.
How does allowing people to carry guns with them ,compared with only at home make it easier for a criminal to get a gun?QFT. I honestly cant think of an incident where someone protected themselves from an armed criminal with another gun. It simply doesnt happen enough to warrant the easier access criminals have to get guns.
Perhaps 1 in 20 (probably being VERY liberal with that) murders can be prevented by another person with a gun. But if we take away guns it would be more like 15 out of 20 would be prevented simply by the hardship it takes to get a weapon.
QFT. I honestly cant think of an incident where someone protected themselves from an armed criminal with another gun. It simply doesnt happen enough to warrant the easier access criminals have to get guns.
Perhaps 1 in 20 (probably being VERY liberal with that) murders can be prevented by another person with a gun. But if we take away guns it would be more like 15 out of 20 would be prevented simply by the hardship it takes to get a weapon.
No.
Arizona law states that any person legally able to own a firearm may carry the weapon in public so long as it is in public view and is holstered/slung. This does not apply to concealed carry permit holders, who may conceal their weapons.
You haven't addressed the previous oppositions made to your other post.Does the law also state you can carry ammo inside the gun while in public? If it does, then you should be allowed to shoot somebody right? I mean that's why we have guns is to kill people. This isn't the wild west anymore. Other countries have matured and advanced while you still follow laws made in 1812.
Thanks for sparking yet another Iraq conflict discussion, in a place where it clearly isn't needed.When I read the story of how students jumped off the floor to escape from the killer, I think of Iraqi people. The students bear the panic for a couple dozen of minutes. Iraqi people are under constant pressure of being bombed, kidnapped and killed for more than four years. Yet the situation worsens.
Is Iraq a big Virginia Tech? Does Bush play the role of Cho Seung Hui? He intrudes Iraq and shoot people at his own will. What is this war for? How can Bush still be the US president? A killer of massacre.
When I read the story of how students jumped off the floor to escape from the killer, I think of Iraqi people. The students bear the panic for a couple dozen of minutes. Iraqi people are under constant pressure of being bombed, kidnapped and killed for more than four years. Yet the situation worsens.
Is Iraq a big Virginia Tech? Does Bush play the role of Cho Seung Hui? He intrudes Iraq and shoot people at his own will. What is this war for? How can Bush still be the US president? A killer of massacre.
How does allowing people to carry guns with them ,compared with only at home make it easier for a criminal to get a gun?
Thought it was pretty obvious that I made them up to exemplify the idea that a better method of prevention would be to remove the guns of criminals rather than just throw more guns into the mix.Where did you get these statistics from?
Stephen King said:Dude was crazy.