2003 Release date...can anyone verify?

Seriously cadaveca.... If you're not going to take anyone seriously and keep putting people (who know what they are talking about) down, then you need to take your ignorance elsewhere.
 
cadaveca said:
why would he change his tune?
that is my question.what was the big thing that made the difference? what happened?
sure, he said the date(at least one quote), and missed it. why? why, one year ago, were we all so dissappointed?


Because the game simply wasn't done. They overestimated...bad planning (as doug and gabe have said since...I will find links if you'd like). He stated it around the time it was delayed.

Valve, Gabe, truly hoped the game would be out by then...they thought they could make sept 30th and missed it. Simple as that really. They blew it.

The game was delayed because it wasn't done (nothing to do with hardware or the theft).

And for the record...I'll be 37 next month so the:

cadaveca said:
and if you kiddies did some research.....(snip) is more adolescent dribble.

comments don't really go along way in showing your
e own maturity.
 
yeah honestly, talking about fighting against logic, way to bring this stuff up a year later when searching through archived information is as easy as trying to convince you of the truth.

the most memoriable proof i know of is a direct quote of gabe newell in person during an INTERVIEW IN PERSON which is impossible to find, i'm searching now, i believe it was on a sunday he said that the game was going to be release sept. 30th, and i only rememberd that because one day later it was delayed. a lot revolved around that quote for a few weeks...

>_< it's such solid proof it isn't funny, and obviously i'm not gonna be able to find it with any ease anytime soon... it's rediculous how incredibly ignorant you are, considering you could be doing half the work we are for the sources you want so dearly.

i swear when i find this quote, i will exact revenge on you some how with my computer knowledge for this stress. and no, i can't just ignore you, i'm must prove you wrong, for i know this to be fact.
 
exoeight said:
he want's proof is the arguement, and we have given it, and he denies it. that's the arguement.

it's not about him believing it or not, about him denying every source given.


that's called a debate. i said this before. i even agreed with you. so why are you posting that i am still wrong? i don't get it.
 
But maybe he had posted reasons somewhere

THATS PRETTY FUNNY YOU TARD

i recall links to things... especially e-mails... and links to sites... IN THIS THREAD
 
exoeight said:
yeah honestly, talking about fighting against logic, way to bring this stuff up a year later when searching through archived information is as easy as trying to convince you of the truth.

the most memoriable proof i know of is a direct quote of gabe newell in person during an INTERVIEW IN PERSON which is impossible to find, i'm searching now, i believe it was on a sunday he said that the game was going to be release sept. 30th, and i only rememberd that because one day later it was delayed. a lot revolved around that quote for a few weeks...

>_< it's such solid proof it isn't funny, and obviously i'm not gonna be able to find it with any ease anytime soon... it's rediculous how incredibly ignorant you are, considering you could be doing half the work we are for the sources you want so dearly.

i swear when i find this quote, i will exact revenge on you some how with my computer knowledge for this stress. and no, i can't just ignore you, i'm must prove you wrong, for i know this to be fact.


that's what i asked for from the beginning..not flaming...
you flame.. i flame back. pretty basic. anyone who made a comment without a flame i pretty much agreed with. everyone who flamed i argued.
 
can you all deny that the last minute "sept 30th 2003" thing the day before delay was fake? it was famous!

arggg

it must be on the net somewhere.... >_<
 
exoeight said:
can you all deny that the last minute "sept 30th 2003" thing the day before delay was fake? it was famous!

arggg

it must be on the net somewhere.... >_<

He already admitted that he was wrong about that and that it was indeed Valve's official release date.

I'm currently unable to determine what his point is now though.
 
Someone said:
Because the game simply wasn't done. They overestimated...bad planning (as doug and gabe have said since...I will find links if you'd like). He stated it around the time it was delayed.

Valve, Gabe, truly hoped the game would be out by then...they thought they could make sept 30th and missed it. Simple as that really. They blew it.

The game was delayed because it wasn't done (nothing to do with hardware or the theft).

And for the record...I'll be 37 next month so the:



comments don't really go along way in showing your
e own maturity.
i never claimed to be mature! lol


truly tho.. i would like to know what it was that made the game incomplete. was there an insurmountable error or something, or was it the hardware. Or was it microsoft. If i ask a question, i generally like to be able to have facts to back up the answer. this is all i ever asked for. i then asked for something outside of the gaming industry, because my differing info came from outside as well.

in regards to my comment, if you have not flamed, i am truly sorry for including you in that crowd, your comment i just quoted was the exact type of respons i was looking for, and i've been greatly distracte by the flamewar i seem to have started. Keeps people busy tho. :bounce: :thumbs: :bounce:
 
oh wait, it's not reliable source unless gabe says it two times IN A ROW.... >_<

one source is enough sources, this dude needs to just go now.
 
exoeight said:
....ok... so then we got him a source? wtf?

Well, we all posted numerous sources. There were two which specifcally said that Gabe said September 30th. I get them for you but I have to run. There's back a ways in the thread I think around page 4 or 5 maybe.
 
Neutrino said:
He already admitted that he was wrong about that and that it was indeed Valve's official release date.

I'm currently unable to determine what his point is now though.

i don't have a point. i never did. i had unaswered questions, and some have been aswered. they have sparked further questions...so i have asked. This place should have all the answers, no? should be the best place, yes?

and i already researched everything. i did that before i created my idea weeks ago. Most of the ideas passed are assumptions based on fact, and although this is good info, i prefer to stick to publicised fact. a forum is not entirely public.
 
truly tho.. i would like to know what it was that made the game incomplete.

half life 2 leak, i have it, it's incomplete, that's probably what was wrong.

the hackers stated that "they took what valve had", that is somewhere on a major news website and i have no time to go through news sites, you can do it, try CNN, you may find it there.

what valve had was not much.

i know, i had it for a long time.
 
yea...i beleived it was going to be released on the 30th until the last minute :frown: lets just hope our hearts wont be breaking again.
 
exoeight said:
oh wait, it's not reliable source unless gabe says it two times IN A ROW.... >_<

one source is enough sources, this dude needs to just go now.
gabe also has to be standing on his head and clapping his hands while he is saying it two times in a row for it to be a satisfactory source for cadaver
 
exoeight said:
yeah honestly, talking about fighting against logic, way to bring this stuff up a year later when searching through archived information is as easy as trying to convince you of the truth.


this is why i asked the questons i did.
 
place should have all the answers, no? should be the best place, yes?

your assumtions bring out your ignorance.

the best is an opinion, many other major hl2 sites, like hl2fallout.
 
cadaveca your registration date reads august 2004, most of us here have been around for over a year, we were right here on these bloody forums when it happened; we all remember perfectly what happened.

But you... you weren't here last year, and you pop out of the blue asking us to dig up old threads just for your sake? Do it yourself, that's why there's a search function and if you still can't find anything, just browse manually through the threads 'till you find what you're looking for.

Neutrino already gave you what you asked for, and you just ignored him so my advice to you is go look for the threads yourself.
 
speaking of hl2fallout, gabe newell personally browses those... i bet you'd have more luck over there.
 
cadaveca said:
i never claimed to be mature! lol


truly tho.. i would like to know what it was that made the game incomplete. was there an insurmountable error or something, or was it the hardware. Or was it microsoft. If i ask a question, i generally like to be able to have facts to back up the answer.

Now worries...you never flamed me personally, but I am one of the people in the thread so those comments do have a "blanket" effect to everyone in the thread.

On that note, only valve know the answer for absolute fact.

There will be no 100% fact in any direction why it was delayed....all we have is Gabe/Doug saying "It just wasn't done." And also "It wasn't because of the theft." (both can be found fairly quickly I would think)

I would say realistically the game just wasn't close to being done and they overestimated (a lot of games are delayed after all). I think the code theft added to the length of the delay in the end. I would say the Nvidia stuff probably added (somewhat) to it because obviously they wanted everyone to buy the game and nVidia is obviously a HUGE market. Not that they delayed the game because if nVidia, but I imagine they spent a LOT of time while building the game trying to make it work right for those cards work up to snuff.

But that's all speculation..and sadly we'll probably never know the absolute truth.
 
exoeight said:
your assumtions bring out your ignorance.

the best is an opinion, many other major hl2 sites, like hl2fallout.

CB | Para said:
cadaveca your registration date reads august 2004, most of us here have been around for over a year, we were right here on these bloody forums when it happened; we all remember perfectly what happened.

But you... you weren't here last year, and you pop out of the blue asking us to dig up old threads just for your sake? Do it yourself, that's why there's a search function and if you still can't find anything, just browse manually through the threads 'till you find what you're looking for.

Neutrino already gave you what you asked for, and you just ignored him so my advice to you is go look for the threads yourself.

can you see me posting this at other sites? i wouldn't have even gotten the aswers i did here. i said that ya'all had given me what i wanted, then ya'all posts more flames...i just kept it going.

ya'all are funny"we are right! why does he insist we aren't", when i agreed with you pages ago! :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :thumbs:
 
Please don't base your entire story on the fact that Gabe gave Doug a dirty look when he mentioned the release date at the conclusion of that presentation. You know, he could have been glaring at him for other reasons... like maybe he was suppost to keep his trap shut and not mention it at all, but did anyway. :hmph: :burp:
 
it's not about being right you idiot!

i never said a thing about you being wrong.

it's about you DENYING obvious PROOF.

GABE said it right before the delay, undeniable.
 
exoeight said:
it's not about being right you idiot!

i never said a thing about you being wrong.

it's about you DENYING obviouse PROOF.

GABE said it right before the delay, undeniable.

does it make you feel better to say i was wrong? Does that help your self confidence? i can post more if you like...
 
Mold said:
Please don't base your entire story on the fact that Gabe gave Doug a dirty look when he mentioned the release date at the conclusion of that presentation. You know, he could have been glaring at him for other reasons... like maybe he was suppost to keep his trap shut and not mention it at all, but did anyway. :hmph: :burp:


i thought about that...but why would he stress that the BENCHMARK, and not the game was coming out? Yes i know it was a hardware conference, and that it was geared to tekheads like myself, but who cares about a benchmark when you could have the game? Everyone known that it's reall game performance that makes the difference, and not benches. Perfect example is the nvida/ati fiasco with each manufacturer cheating in thier own way in 3dmark.
 
i was wrong

repeat to rub in your face you stupid jerk.

Arguing B.S. to be annoying after you are wrong is beyond an immature debate.
 
exoeight said:
i swear when i find this quote, i will exact revenge on you some how with my computer knowledge for this stress. and no, i can't just ignore you, i'm must prove you wrong, for i know this to be fact.


now i can take this quote, and the firewall logs with the failed hack attemps just made and file a report. haven't been able to do that in a while! if ya really want in my machine, just ask, and i'll let ya remote in. nothing a format re-install won't fix. you can only get at one machine!
 
exoeight said:
repeat to rub in your face you stupid jerk.

Arguing B.S. to be annoying after you are wrong is beyond an immature debate.
yet you still try to flame away, like a donkey chasing a carrot...follow blind one..follow...

i'd call that pwn3d.
 
cadaveca did u not look at the picture i posted on page 3? here it is again ...look at the top right hand corner of the image . what does it say?

anyway im not sure what point ur trying to make. that gabe didnt lie to us? it was all VUs fault? please tell me :p
 
Someone said:
Now worries...you never flamed me personally, but I am one of the people in the thread so those comments do have a "blanket" effect to everyone in the thread.

On that note, only valve know the answer for absolute fact.

There will be no 100% fact in any direction why it was delayed....all we have is Gabe/Doug saying "It just wasn't done." And also "It wasn't because of the theft." (both can be found fairly quickly I would think)

I would say realistically the game just wasn't close to being done and they overestimated (a lot of games are delayed after all). I think the code theft added to the length of the delay in the end. I would say the Nvidia stuff probably added (somewhat) to it because obviously they wanted everyone to buy the game and nVidia is obviously a HUGE market. Not that they delayed the game because if nVidia, but I imagine they spent a LOT of time while building the game trying to make it work right for those cards work up to snuff.

But that's all speculation..and sadly we'll probably never know the absolute truth.


so what's your opinion on the game game was complete, but only in DX8, and the delay was for DX9?
 
exoeight said:
repeat to rub in your face you stupid jerk.

Arguing B.S. to be annoying after you are wrong is beyond an immature debate.

CB | Para hastily runs away from this thread...
 
cadaveca said:
so what's your opinion on the game game was complete, but only in DX8, and the delay was for DX9?

Me personal opinion is the game wasn't done at all. Not just DX9 or whatever....

I think a good portion (models/maps/sounds/engine/physics etc) of the actual content was incomplete.

I don't think it would have added a year+ to the time of the game finally being released otherwise.

And I believe the stolen build did work in dx8 and dx9....someone who has played it would have to confirm that though. I could be wrong on that though.
 
ukfluke said:
cadaveca did u not look at the picture i posted on page 3? here it is again ...look at the top right hand corner of the image . what does it say?

anyway im not sure what point ur trying to make. that gabe didnt lie to us? it was all VUs fault? please tell me :p

i've always held the opinion that the stolen build was just a compile of partial work for e3 2003, and that's based on the mark in the top right. like i said before, i heard that it was a harddrive that got stolen, and not a hack. i'll find the pics of the empty machine ( the vid card was scoffed as well) and post 'em but i think it may have been some other machine, but the 2 incidents just kinda fit together. If they truly wanted a sept 30th release, do you think htey would spend the time in that code to display that, or the game?
 
Someone said:
Me personal opinion is the game wasn't done at all. Not just DX9 or whatever....

I think a good portion (models/maps/sounds/engine/physics etc) of the actual content was incomplete.

I don't think it would have added a year+ to the time of the game finally being released otherwise.

And I believe the stolen build did work in dx8 and dx9....someone who has played it would have to confirm that though. I could be wrong on that though.


i never played it...i have respected valve and thier request to not download it. I have this wonderful thing called patience. Comes from dealing with whining kids all day.
 
yes yes the DX9 stuff works in the stolen build. Also cadaveca E3 was not 4 days before 30 sept 2003.

also to make things up in your head like "stolen build was just a compile of partial work for e3 2003" when you havnt even played the stolen build? lol

well i have and i can tell u everything is there that they had. why would they have 20 odd levels that werent even shown at e3? and all the models etc etc.

also last time i checked its pretty hard to steal a hard disk from america when your in germany. ( the guy they flew over for the fake interview to bust ). Gabe newel himself also gave a full account of his pc being compromised. I think that posts on HL2 world somewhere.
 
cadaveca said:
was the interview with gabe saying so posted here? you would think so, seeing how valve funds this forum, if it was official.

still no links.

when did Gabe change from benchmark "to test upcoming hardware and drivers" to Game?

My question to you is - why do you care? What do you need this information for? Heap of people have already asked you why you are bothering to push for this information so stongly and you have dodged the question every time. Are you a lawyer working for Vivendi or something? What is so goddam important about who said what over a year ago?

I guess the crux of my problem with this entire thread is that you haven't explained what you will be using this information for...
 
Spugmaster said:
My question to you is - why do you care? What do you need this information for? Heap of people have already asked you why you are bothering to push for this information so stongly and you have dodged the question every time. Are you a lawyer working for Vivendi or something? What is so goddam important about who said what over a year ago?

I guess the crux of my problem with this entire thread is that you haven't explained what you will be using this information for...

Reflection on what happened...i had differing info.
answering questions...
Does curiosity ever have a reason?

I WILL be publishing an article on what has happened, but if i am to quote things that have happened i need reliable resources. i said this earlier. that is why i questioned everything. my reptation within a different community is kinda important to me, and i don't want to be saying stuff that is not true.
 
ukfluke said:
yes yes the DX9 stuff works in the stolen build. Also cadaveca E3 was not 4 days before 30 sept 2003.

also to make things up in your head like "stolen build was just a compile of partial work for e3 2003" when you havnt even played the stolen build? lol

well i have and i can tell u everything is there that they had. why would they have 20 odd levels that werent even shown at e3? and all the models etc etc.

also last time i checked its pretty hard to steal a hard disk from america when your in germany. ( the guy they flew over for the fake interview to bust ). Gabe newel himself also gave a full account of his pc being compromised. I think that posts on HL2 world somewhere.

you have admitted to using the stolen build...do you think that after denying Valve's request you deserve to recieve the real version? I don't think that I would be deserving if i went behind someones back to take a look at their secrets. This is why i ask questions
 
Back
Top