Lil' Timmy
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2003
- Messages
- 3,904
- Reaction score
- 0
the boards are known for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
RakuraiTenjin said:See, personally I just find this train of thought disgusting and somewhat simply cold. Not insulting you personally or anything, or calling you a name, but that's just how it seems to me x.x I consider it a child. It's an unborn human.
Conception.Neutrino said:So at what point is it a child? The sperm cell? When the sperm cell meets the egg cell? One week into the pregnancy? Two weeks? One month?
How can you determine at what exact point it stops being some a collection of cells and at what point it becomes a child? It seems mostly subjective to me.
RakuraiTenjin said:See, personally I just find this train of thought disgusting and somewhat simply cold. Not insulting you personally or anything, or calling you a name, but that's just how it seems to me x.x I consider it a child. It's an unborn human.
YOU are an unaborted baby, too. Still feel it needs to be changed?Tredoslop said:
So are you.RakuraiTenjin said:YOU are an unaborted baby, too. Still feel it needs to be changed?
Exactly. I wasn't the one encouraging abortion.Tredoslop said:So are you.
Neutrino said:So at what point is it a child? The sperm cell? When the sperm cell meets the egg cell? One week into the pregnancy? Two weeks? One month?
How can you determine at what exact point it stops being some a collection of cells and at what point it becomes a child? It seems mostly subjective to me.
ytinupmi said:you should have made a thread about partial birth abortions, those are where the baby is basically delivered, except it's head stays in the vagina and they crack it's skull open and suck it's brain out with a vacuum, now that is a controversial subject.
ytinupmi said:you should have made a thread about partial birth abortions, those are where the baby is basically delivered, except it's head stays in the vagina and they crack it's skull open and suck it's brain out with a vacuum, now that is a controversial subject.
What's sad is that it was only recently banned. And many groups like Planned Parenthood want it legalized again.AntiAnto said:Now that's really disgusting... I don't see the point in this post
RakuraiTenjin said:What's sad is that it was only recently banned. And many groups like Planned Parenthood want it legalized again.
Something that REALLY sickened me about Planned Parenthood is that they encouraging being PROUD of abortions, not just fighting for it to be allowed. They sell T-Shirts that say in bold letters "I Had An Abortion."
RakuraiTenjin said:What's sad is that it was only recently banned. And many groups like Planned Parenthood want it legalized again.
Something that REALLY sickened me about Planned Parenthood is that they encouraging being PROUD of abortions, not just fighting for it to be allowed. They sell T-Shirts that say in bold letters "I Had An Abortion."
AntiAnto said:I did not know that. Where the hell are we going...
AntiAnto said:Where the hell are we going...
dfc05 said:I say when the sperm meets the egg cell. Why? Because, if left without interference, it would develop into a child whether you call it a "child" or not at this stage. That's what I'd say against the "But what about sperm cells; we're not allowed to kill those?" arguments. Once the sperm meets the egg cell, a new life is developing, and I don't think it's right to end that just because you don't think of it as a "child" yet.
thanks for the link jmechy it's interesting to see a throrough deductive exploration of the issue.Jmechy said:If you care at all about this subject, and have never read the Thomson argument, i suggest you do so. It is a few pages long, but I have a feeling it will change the way you think about this issue.
http://www.utdallas.edu/~jfg021000/thomson.html
i can never make out what they are saying..User Name said:Why don't you just let the unborn baby decide?
what if you walk into a store and it's being robbed. the robber approaches you to kill you as he wants no witnessess. do you have the right to defend yourself? you are the one who chose to go into the store.. should you just lay down and take the consequences?abconners said:Illegal all the way. what right does someone have to take anothers life. just because someone is a fetus doesn't make him/her not human. it is the mother who choose to get knocked up and not the child, so she should be willing to pay the consequences.
Defend yourself. How does this example even relate? I can't find a correlating thing in it.Lil' Timmy said:what if you walk into a store and it's being robbed. the robber approaches you to kill you as he wants no witnessess. do you have the right to defend yourself? you are the one who chose to go into the store.. should you just lay down and take the consequences?
Lil' Timmy said:what if you walk into a store and it's being robbed. the robber approaches you to kill you as he wants no witnessess. do you have the right to defend yourself? you are the one who chose to go into the store.. should you just lay down and take the consequences?
What?Letters said:Definitely legal... the stupid 14-year-old should not have to be forced into having a baby... not just for her sake, but for the kid's...
i didn't make my point, sorry. the point was that there are cases in which the life of the mother becomes threatened by the continued life of the fetus. so, what rights does the mother have in this case? are they any different than normal self-defense rights? this was a point in response to the claim that abortion should be unconditionally illegal (made by abconners, among others).RakuraiTenjin said:Defend yourself. How does this example even relate? WTFUX0RZ?? YOU DIE!
It depends on the situation. Partial birth abortions should ALWAYS be illegal, even in situations of the mother's health there. The baby is ****ing AWARE at that point, no more growth- and only a matter of 4 inches, delegates the difference there.. it's disgusting.Lil' Timmy said:i didn't make my point, sorry. the point was that there are cases in which the life of the mother becomes threatened by the continued life of the fetus. so, what rights does the mother have in this case? are they any different than normal self-defense rights? this was a point in response to the claim that abortion should be unconditionally illegal (made by abconners, among others).
it is? hmm.. i did not know that..Foxtrot said:Murdering babies is still murder, so no. Rape is OK though.
why is the baby's right to life greater than the mother's?RakuraiTenjin said:Partial birth abortions should ALWAYS be illegal, even in situations of the mother's health there. The baby is ****ing AWARE at that point, no more growth- and only a matter of 4 inches, delegates the difference there.. it's disgusting.
RakuraiTenjin said:It depends on the situation. Partial birth abortions should ALWAYS be illegal, even in situations of the mother's health there...And by mother's health I mean life or death.
Yeah, let's ruin the girl's life for the sake of something that's not even alive. And my other point was that if it did live, there's a high chance for a crappy life anyway.RakuraiTenjin said:What?
So you are saying for the baby's sake, we should kill it? That's just sickening to me x.x
It should be put up for adoption.