K e r b e r o s
Newbie
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2003
- Messages
- 3,227
- Reaction score
- 0
Well, I'd appreciate it. Understand, its just a little embarrasing to say that it is your second language, even more so embarrasing for someone to constantly criticize it. Whats more, you can't use this "I don't understand you" drivel for much longer. It's not giving your arguements any more weight then they already have, and personally, its just annoying off-topic banter.
Mortiz understood what I wrote, and so do other people here -- I don't think I need to concern myself too much with you if your being picky with what you read.
Picking on me still does'nt illegitimize my arguements. You have either of two choices: You can refute my statements, or stare at them.
I can't wait on you any longer.
Mortiz has got my attention now.
Mortiz, same situation. Its a country thats accused of having WMD's it obviously does not. Going back to the statement you quoted me of, it still does'nt make what Bush said a threat to Iraq.
It's illogical to say Bush's message was a threat to Iraq. It carries with it no content of a threat, who he's threatening, or what he's threatening them with.
The question was to CptStern, but evidently he's called it quits for argueing against me. My point again, was the question: How can you state that a suicide bomber is less destructive and less discerning with its target then a Cruise Missle? Both have killed civilians, but the difference is, a Cruise Missle is'int programmed to specifically target civilians.
On Iraqibodycount.net, it even has a chart of those people killed as a result of the bombings by cruise missles, and most them, if not all of them are killed by the debris spread by the Cruise Missle's shockwave, not the blast directly.
This says to me, that they're not targeting civilians intentionally. Besides, those area's hit by the cruise missles were military installations to begin with. Installations that Sodamn Insane intentionally setup in residential districts to deteir a US Armed Response to them.
Obviously, he underestimated us.
But is'int the true issue that this, "Arab Lady" tells it like it is over an Al-Jazeera broadcast? How can what qualitive issues Stern or you even brought up be constructive, or even about this threads original debate?
I might be antagonizing the arguement just a bit forward, the people who really brought this thread off-topic are really to blame, as they've managed to get everyone's attention off what this thread author wanted to bring to our attention.
I've said my lot, and will say no more.
I was addressing the issues CptStern and Solaris brought to the table. How you can take issue with what I said to him is beyond me, considering you dont have the responsbility of making the statements they did. Its not owed of you to respond to the questions and demands I made of them.
If you missed what we were talking about [in reference to your unkeen observations], please, review the pages and posts past in this thread, because to summarize this off-topic rant in its fullest, its this: "My bomber's got better morales then yours".
Stop believing I'm excusing them, because I obviously condemned it previous. I was only providing another source of speculation for, why they did what they did. Horrible in outcome yes, I agree. But we can't just assume everything that America has done for other countries it had malicious beliefs for also.
Alright, have you done a search for the beheading videos? A slow death is worse then any torture, oh, and they kill their prisoners aswell as humiliate them before they kill them aswell.
Don't forget Daniel Pearl. As a matter a fact, do a search for it because I've long quoted Ogrish for Insurgent attrocities, and they range in the hundreds. It might do you some good to understand them.
