Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally posted by anarchy
I think its unreasonable to chage for it. And we both know CS was a huge success and THEN valve bought it...$$$
Whats to stop them from doing it to all the other good mods, that is my concern.
I think its unreasonable to chage for it. And we both know CS was a huge success and THEN valve bought it...$$$
Whats to stop them from doing it to all the other good mods, that is my concern.
Originally posted by anarchy
We're pretty sure that the $9.95 guys are going to get the better value, as we've been pretty good over the years at generating a lot of content
Didnt it take them 5 years to release hl2? So 60 months at 10 bucks a month...well I dont see how thats the "better value"
Originally posted by Feath
He's talking about expansion packs and Team Fortress 2. We have no idea how close Team Fortress 2 is close to completion.
Originally posted by Feath
I give up.
You seem to have a problem with paying for things.
Originally posted by anarchy
Pfft...I want to walk into my local compusa, put 50 bucks on the counter, and walk out with half-life2 that includes MP, Free mods like CS2, and Single player. I dont want to be duked into paying 10 bucks a month on the hopes that they will eventually release cs2 or tf2 for my 10 bucks.
Originally posted by )[eVo]( Para
Forget it Feath... it's like trying to explain Newton's theory of gravity to a mentally disabled child. He won't get it.
Originally posted by Sigoo
It mentions sierra in the email. I thought vindi(i forgot how to spell it) was publishing it.
Originally posted by Feath
He's talking about expansion packs and Team Fortress 2. We have no idea how close Team Fortress 2 is close to completion.
Dagobert: can you read?
"The second is our traditional single-player plus multiplayer SKU that runs MODs"
It comes with multiplayer.
Originally posted by anarchy
We're pretty sure that the $9.95 guys are going to get the better value, as we've been pretty good over the years at generating a lot of content
Didnt it take them 5 years to release hl2? So 60 months at 10 bucks a month...well I dont see how thats the "better value"
Originally posted by Dagobert
That's one interpretation of the words
Gabe
traditional single-player plus multiplayer SKU that runs MODs
That's one interpretation of the words, the other is that there is a SKU that contains the single player game, plus the ability to download mods, some of which are multiplayer.
Originally posted by droper
final note: they are #$%@ing with a good thing.
Someone may have noted this in the earlier posts (I dont bother reading through it all), but I distinctly remember they said the engine was designed from a MP point of view... That this was the core of it. How can one limit it to SP? Removing certain maps? MP is still there. Removing parts of the engine? Seems very troublesome just to release two different versions... But maybe that's just me.Originally posted by Inflatablewoman
My gf never plays online, so why should she pay for the online version?
Originally posted by Logic
I think we should keep in mind that there may be quite a large audience for a single player only package - obviously none of us will come under that category, since none of that audience would be hanging around internet forums like these.
I'm sure valve wouldn't be making these sorts of marketing decisions without researching beforehand. Even if some of the options don't appeal to us, they may still appeal to a different audience. Besides, there are options to suit us as well.
Originally posted by MoJo|Night
Remove the menu options and delete the netcode libraries. That would give it a decent go I would have thought.
Originally posted by Kamakiri
Now that is one of the best points I've read in this thread. IMO reading all the posts here I was agreeing with alot of people with the SP only SKU being a flop.