Gay? okay or wrong.

Right or wrong

  • Okay

    Votes: 94 58.4%

  • Wrong

    Votes: 20 12.4%

  • IF they leave me alone, I'll leave them alone

    Votes: 47 29.2%
  • Total voters
    161
Status
Not open for further replies.
Threads like this are a waste of time and should be banned on all internet forums.

If you don't follow the leftie attitude of saying you think that homosexuality is totally acceptable (even though it's pretty much forbidden by all religions and isn't really natural) then you're branded as a facist pig, so what's the point?
 
Erestheux said:
Dear halflife2.net

Lou is probably kngHenry. If he isn't, he is a kngHenry wannabe. He's only saying homophobic things and things that piss you off because he likes to piss people off. He probably doesn't even believe the shit he keeps saying, he's just a weird guy who gets off to irritating people on the internet.

So stop giving him entertainment, mmkay?

Sincerely,
Erestheux
Click to expand...

yes but it's fun :)


craig, you're entitled to your opinion, however once opinion turns to hate dont expect people to not react in a like manner

saying

"I dont agree with their lifestyle choice"

and

"it's unnatural and is the same thing as beastiality or a pedophilia"


is 2 different things altogether


I dont mind the former but abhorr the latter
 
craig said:
(even though it's pretty much forbidden by all religions and isn't really natural)
Click to expand...
Religions can forbid all they like, it still isn't a validation for something. And could you offer some proof that it isn't natural? It happens, that's natural enough for me. It's not supernatural is it? People seem to have this concept that gay people choose to be gay. It's a pretty strange concept to me that anyone would actively choose their sexuality, but that's just me.

But yeah, threads like these are a magnet for stupidity.
 
I don't believe that gay people choose to be gay. I do believe that it's something they're born with, but I also believe that homosexuality is wrong.

If homosexuality was 'natural' then wouldn't the species die out? And wouldn't a homosexual men have a third hole in the nether regions with a 'insert penis here' sign attached to it?
 
Sulkdodds said:
Translation of answers:

Option 1. I have a brain.
Option 2. I am crazy-mad.
Option 3. I refuse to come out of the cloest.
Click to expand...
QFMFT.
 
craig said:
I don't believe that gay people choose to be gay. I do believe that it's something they're born with, but I also believe that homosexuality is wrong.

If homosexuality was 'natural' then wouldn't the species die out? And wouldn't a homosexual men have a third hole in the nether regions with a 'insert penis here' sign attached to it?
Click to expand...

by that logic wouldnt people who have no desire to have children die out? why after thousands of years do we still have people who dont ever want to have children? surely they would have died out by now as they serve no purpose ...evolutionaryily speaking
 
craig said:
I don't believe that gay people choose to be gay. I do believe that it's something they're born with, but I also believe that homosexuality is wrong.

If homosexuality was 'natural' then wouldn't the species die out? And wouldn't a homosexual men have a third hole in the nether regions with a 'insert penis here' sign attached to it?
Click to expand...

Sorry I'm finding it hard not to laugh as I reply, you're entitled to your opinion mate; please excuse me while I take myself off to laugh out loud.

BTW I voted option a
 
craig said:
If homosexuality was 'natural' then wouldn't the species die out?
Click to expand...
No. Your definition of natural seems to assume that it must apply to every living human, which is just silly. The thing is, as I see it, that Hetero and Homosexuality are both natural. They can and do exist alongside each other. Some people are naturally heterosexual, some people are naturally homosexual, some people are naturally bi- or a-sexual. Why must there be only one "correct" way? Does everything in human experience ultimately boil down to an agenda of reproduction?
 
Stop branding me a homophobe. I already said I am not. I love lesbians and I have nothing against gay men. I would never insult or attack a gay person solely for being gay. The only instance in which I would do such a thing is if such person tricks me into thinking he is a girl, then I would beat the crap out of him, just like any other straight man would. Other than that, I am a very pacific person. Want to dress like a woman and act like one? Fine, I don't care. I can tolerate that. But DON'T try to force me into embracing their lifestyle. I don't like gay people and I have a right not to. Here, where I come from, there is this 'thing' they call freedom of association which allows me to not associate with those I don’t want to associate with. If I want to stay away from gay people, I have every right in the world to do so. I am sick and tired of liberals insulting those who disagree with them. Either they are right, or some people just don't think like them. I think the latter makes more sense. Get over it. It's as if having an opinion different than yours somehow threatens to capitalize your capacity to have ideas of your own. Why do you care what I think? I am not a homophobe, but I don't like gay people. So what? You want homophobes to accept gays but you can't accept homophobes and those who don't feel inclined to embrace homosexuality? Talk to me about tolerance. How are you any different than them? Give me a ****ing break. You just want to have a common enemy that you can fight so you can have that sense of camaraderie and comradeship, you want to have that 'us vs them' mentality, so you can feel less guilty for your actions because you know what you are doing is wrong. Rather than accepting that homosexuals are the ones with a problem you try to pass on the blame onto those who disagree with you. Start ****ing taking responsibilities for your own choices and stop blaming others for your inadequacies.
 
Lou said:
Stop branding me a homophobe. I already said I am not. I love lesbians and I have nothing against gay men. I would never insult or attack a gay person solely for being gay. The only instance in which I would do such a thing is if such person tricks me into thinking he is a girl, then I would beat the crap out of him, just like any other straight man would. Other than that, I am a very pacific person. Want to dress like a woman and act like one? Fine, I don't care. I can tolerate that. But DON'T try to force me into embracing their lifestyle. I don't like gay people and I have a right not to. Here, where I come from, there is this 'thing' they call freedom of association which allows me to not associate with those I don’t want to associate with. If I want to stay away from gay people, I have every right in the world to do so. I am sick and tired of liberals insulting those who disagree with them. Either they are right, or some people just don't think like them. I think the latter makes more sense. Get over it. It's as if having an opinion different than yours somehow threatens to capitalize your capacity to have ideas of your own. Why do you care what I think? I am not a homophobe, but I don't like gay people. So what? You want homophobes to accept gays but you can't accept homophobes and those who don't feel inclined to embrace homosexuality? Talk to me about tolerance. How are you any different than them? Give me a ****ing break. You just want to have a common enemy that you can fight so you can have that sense of camaraderie and comradeship, you want to have that 'us vs them' mentality, so you can feel less guilty for your actions because you know what you are doing is wrong. Rather than accepting that homosexuals are the ones with a problem you try to pass on the blame onto those who disagree with you. Start ****ing taking responsibilities for your own choices and stop blaming others for your inadequacies.
Click to expand...



no, we're right and you're wrong, paragraph breaks are your friend and you cease having a valid opinion once you put yourself (or any other group) above another based solely on gender preference ..you ARE a homophobe and an ignorant one at that
 
Sulkdodds said:
Translation of answers:

Option 1. I have a brain.
Option 2. I am crazy-mad.
Option 3. I refuse to come out of the cloest.
Click to expand...

lol that third one is a lie sulksy :| i voted for that simply because as long as no gay comes up attempting to touch me i won't hurt them :) other then that i don't have a problem with em, each to their own and what not.
 
CptStern said:
you cease having a valid opinion once you put yourself (or any other group) above another based solely on gender preference
Click to expand...

Ironic, that that is exactly what the gay community is doing.
 
OCybrManO said:
gay humans from an evolutionary view

National Geographic on gay animals
Click to expand...
Animals can't think. People are not animals, they can use their brains to tell the difference between right and wrong.

... as for why homophobia shouldn't be accepted: Should xenophobia, anti-semitism, viewing other humans as property, or other such beliefs be accepted? No. It's all FUD leading to hate... which breeds hate crimes and discrimination.
Click to expand...

Since I am not a homophobe I honestly don't care if it should be accepted or not, but I will say this: just like none of those mentalities should be accepted, neither should homosexuality because it destroys the minds of our children and the very fabric of our society. Humans were placed on this earth for one reason: to reproduce. Homosexuals can't do that and therefore threaten with the extinction of the ENTIRE human race.
 
Lou said:
Humans were placed on this earth for one reason: to reproduce.
Click to expand...
What a bleak world-view.
Lou said:
Since I am not a homophobe I honestly don't care if it should be accepted or not
Click to expand...
Lou said:
neither should homosexuality because it destroys the minds of our children and the very fabric of our society.
Click to expand...
Your powers of tolerence are overpowering. I bow down to you oh mighty lord of homophillia.
 
Homosexuals would only threaten the survival of the entire human race, if they managed to make everyone else gay too. Are you implying that people should be forced to reproduce?

I don't see that happening somehow.

Also, it's not as if we need more and more population, if everyone was straight, now that might threaten our survival.
 
Lou said:
Since I am not a homophobe I honestly don't care if it should be accepted or not, but I will say this: just like none of those mentalities should be accepted, neither should homosexuality because it destroys the minds of our children and the very fabric of our society.
Click to expand...

you cant be serious? according to who? you? and yes you are a homophobe, you've more than proven your afraid of gays

Lou said:
Humans were placed on this earth for one reason: to reproduce. Homosexuals can't do that and therefore threaten with the extinction of the ENTIRE human race.
Click to expand...

so we should euthanize sterile couples because they threaten the extinction of the human race?
 
kirovman said:
Homosexuals would only threaten the survival of the entire human race, if they managed to make everyone else gay too. .
Click to expand...

But that's what they are trying to do. Why do you think they are so disapproving of those who don't applaud their sexual orientation?
 
kirovman said:
Homosexuals would only threaten the survival of the entire human race, if they managed to make everyone else gay too. Are you implying that people should be forced to reproduce?
Click to expand...
It's infectious I tell you! The Purple Death is upon us!
 
Oh no, my sexuality is threatened!

How can I maintain my desire for women any longer?

Must...resist...change!

Lou is knghenry.
 
Lou said:
But that's what they are trying to do. Why do you think they are so disapproving of those who don't applaud their sexual orientation?
Click to expand...

The word you were looking for is "accept" not "applaud". If someone refused to accept your sexual orientation you'd disaprove too.

Why don't you just face the fact that there is no valid logical and/or secular argument against homosexuality. Just admit you have an emotional based dislike for gays and be done with it, because that's all it is.
 
Maybe homosexuality is another tool of nature/evolution to help control population?
 
I'm not a homophobe, but I do think homosexuality is unnatural and should not be accepted nor allowed!

...Right?

Well, at least an amazing majority opted for the good answers...
 
Lou said:
Animals can't think. People are not animals, they can use their brains to tell the difference between right and wrong.
Click to expand...
Well, Animals can think. Birds are excellent examples. Some birds can be taught to speak to the extent that they can carry on simple spontaneous conversations with people. They can learn how to work zippers and untie knots. They can even bend a wire into a hook shape to be used to pull something out of a hole. Apes learning sign language is another impressive feat... although they have limited vocabularies... which fits with the fact that the communication/speech area of their brain is proportionately less developed than that of a human. They can be taught to make arts and crafts like basic paintings, necklaces, etc. My cats learned that door knobs are used to open doors by watching us. They understand that they aren't supposed to eat our food or climb around on the counter... and, like children, they also understand that if we're not in the room they can usually get away with it. Animals seem to demonstrate mental capacity roughly equivalent to children either in Piaget's pre-operational or concrete operational stage... albeit without the talking. With that information, I can't logically come to the conclusion that animals don't think. Sure, it's possible but the evidence suggests otherwise.

Also, "right" and "wrong" are subjective. If no one is being harmed and 90-98% (depending on the source) of the people aren't gay... what makes it wrong? They're not going to destroy the human race. If that were true, it probably would have happened thousand of years ago. If your answer involves God saying that it is wrong... don't even bother answering. Our government is supposed to be secular. Do you just not like it because you think the idea of someone having gay sex is disgusting? If so, I don't like tattoos, piercings, plastic surgery, and many other practices I don't really understand... but if other people like it, what's the problem?
 
Lou said:
I am not a homophobe, but I don't like gay people.
Click to expand...
????
I am not a homophobe...just like none of those mentalities should be accepted, neither should homosexuality because it destroys the minds of our children and the very fabric of our society. Homosexuals...threaten with the extinction of the ENTIRE human race.
Click to expand...
Beg pardon?
 
Lol, lou cracks me up.

I can't even be bothered to reply to his idiotic statements.
 
short recoil said:
Lol, lou cracks me up.

I can't even be bothered to reply to his idiotic statements.
Click to expand...

lol QFT

I've seen these sorts of attitudes too many times before. I wish there was a way to inject correct facts and attitudes into his head without responding.
 
Nat Turner said:
wish there was a way to inject correct facts and attitudes into his head without responding.
Click to expand...

there is ...I hear this does wonders to change attitudes




disclaimer: Stern does not condone, imply nor support any actions that may come from the above picture
 
Facism is acceptable if applied with the left hand.
 
Dammit.
Fascism Is good when used by Left wingers!
 
And what about Communism applied with the right hand?

Not to derail the thread, of course.
 
If they leave me alone. I will leave them alone. My friends godfather is gay and funny as hell!
 
OCybrManO said:
Animals seem to demonstrate mental capacity roughly equivalent to children either in Piaget's pre-operational or concrete operational stage... albeit without the talking. With that information, I can't logically come to the conclusion that animals don't think. Sure, it's possible but the evidence suggests otherwise.
Click to expand...

Since you seem to know so much about developmental psychology I will talk to you in terms you can understand. What you are talking about is called classical conditioning. It means that if B always occurs whenever there is A, the mind of the animal associates A with B. Beat your cat half to death whenever he pees on your counter and you will see how it stops doing it. The cat didn't arrive at the "logical' conclusion that he can't pee on the counter because it's wrong. The cat won't do it because its mind associates peeing on the counter with a beating. It's more of a reflex than a logical process.
 
I wonder if they'll die out..become endangered as numbers dwindle in the future.

Think about it. If we find a way to prevent crime (i'm talkin' a long time here) like in Minority Report or something, then molestation will dwindle, which is how many gay people come about. Thusly they'll be less numbers and since it's not something that you can reproduce...hmmm
 
Homless Snark said:
then molestation will dwindle, which is how many gay people come about.
Click to expand...
It all hinges on whether this sentance is a pile of steaming, misinformed bullshit or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

sharkyshu
Concerns and Thoughts over future Half Life game/s/
Replies
11
Views
2K
SpotEnemyBoats
SpotEnemyBoats
Pikminiman
CES 2014: Steam Machines Round-Up
Replies
3
Views
4K
Pikminiman
Pikminiman
Krynn72
Krynn's medium-level diagnostics for common computer problems.
Replies
6
Views
2K
bobtheskull
bobtheskull
No Limit
Louis CK on Tracy Morgan's Comments About What He Would Do If He Had A Gay Son
2 3
Replies
105
Views
8K
Sheepo
Sheepo
Laivasse
Film Noir
Replies
11
Views
2K
Yorick
Y
Back
Top