Absinthe
The Freeman
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,037
- Reaction score
- 30
No, I really think you should start writing your own posts instead of letting a link do the work for you.
Sources are supposed to provide information that you integrate into your own arguments. They are not substitutions. If you have an opinion on the matter, then make clear the relevance of your link and make use of it.
And just from reading excerpts like this:
And then...
...Don't really lead me to believe this of any kind of coherent thought. Semantic games are of the utmost triviality.
Your second link is also of little worth. When you posit that god (being omniscient) already knew that Adam and Eve would sin and then pretend that they had a choice on the matter, your stupid ass doesn't need to be listened to any more.
Sources are supposed to provide information that you integrate into your own arguments. They are not substitutions. If you have an opinion on the matter, then make clear the relevance of your link and make use of it.
And just from reading excerpts like this:
The young man stood up and said “Sir, is there such thing as cold?”
“Of course there is, what kind of question is that? Haven’t you ever been cold?”
The young man replied, “Actually, sir, cold doesn’t exist.
What we consider to be cold, is really an absence of heat. Absolute zero is when there is absolutely no heat, but cold does not really exist. We have only created that term to describe how we feel when heat is not there.”
The young man continued, “Sir, is there such a thing as dark?”
Once again, the professor responded “Of course there is.” And once again, the student replied “Actually, sir, darkness does not exist.
Darkness is really only the absence of light. Darkness is only a term man developed to describe what happens when there is no light present.”
And then...
The professor responded, “Of course. We have rapes, and murders and violence everywhere in the world, those things are evil.”
The student replied, “Actually, sir, evil does not exist.
Evil is simply the absence of God. Evil is a term man developed to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. It isn’t like truth, or love, which exist as virtues like heat or light. Evil is simply the state where God is not present, like cold without heat or darkness without light.”
...Don't really lead me to believe this of any kind of coherent thought. Semantic games are of the utmost triviality.
Your second link is also of little worth. When you posit that god (being omniscient) already knew that Adam and Eve would sin and then pretend that they had a choice on the matter, your stupid ass doesn't need to be listened to any more.