If Bush wins...

  • Thread starter Shadowlands5325
  • Start date
K e r b e r o s said:
Seriously, I'am getting very angry at being pissed on just because "I'm American". Well, least I know how blacks felt during the 1970's. I hope people in other countries are happy, because if pissing on Americans innocent of voting Bush into office is your trend, well congradulations, its a popular one.

They didn't just feel pissed on in the 70's my friend, they felt pissedd on in the 2000 elections as well...

I also couldnt' vote in 2000 my 18th birthday was in january, after the elections. I wouldn't have voted at all at the time. I had no interest in politics then. I do know though. I'm sure everyone knows who I am voting for.
 
Kerry's and Bush's positions are basically the same.

There is only one fundamental difference. Kerry is a fresh face. Bush isn't. We all know what Bush did and is capable of. The World hates Bush. There is not a single country in the world, with the possible exception of Israel, where Bush is supported by the great majority of the people.

And that, my friends, is the catch. Even if Bush suddenly turns into the best leader the World has ever seen, he already has very low international approvance. With the possible exception of ending with poverty and famine all over the World, there is no way Bush ever will have the World behind him. And the USA are now the most powerful nation the world has ever seen. There is only way power can be exercised over the World by the USA if the anti-Bush/american feelind continues and that is by force.

Let us not allow the USA to become another "gigantic head without a body".
 
Yeah see Sprafa, really, we don't care if the world hates Bush, thats our difference.

Speaking of which, you should stick to your own country and stop getting into our business. "gigantic head without a body" just hush.
 
DiSTuRbEd said:
Yeah see Sprafa, really, we don't care if the world hates Bush, thats our difference.


that attitude is what got you into this big terrorist mess in the first place
 
Exactly. But most Americans are so blind they'll love to vote for Bush and don't understand the consequences. The consequences are anihilation. Long or short term.
 
DiSTuRbEd said:
Yeah see Sprafa, really, we don't care if the world hates Bush, thats our difference.

Speak for yourself please. We live in an international climate, and regardless of whether one cares about other countries or not, such an isolationist attitude is not possible today. Oh, and just to clarify, I don't think other countries hate bush, they hate Bush's policies, which just happen to be the major policies of the US seeing as he is president.

DiSTuRbEd said:
Speaking of which, you should stick to your own country and stop getting into our business. "gigantic head without a body" just hush.

Ah the old your not from my country so you shouldn't care about our business argument.

That's funny....I seem to remember something about this little country called Iraq.....
 
I want Bush to win, he does have his heart in the right place. I don't think Kerry is the man for the job.
 
Sprafa said:
Exactly. But most Americans are so blind they'll love to vote for Bush and don't understand the consequences. The consequences are anihilation. Long or short term.

Yeah cause the world is going to be destroyed, right? :rolleyes:
 
DiSTuRbEd said:
Yeah cause the world is going to be destroyed, right? :rolleyes:

No, because the World wil suffer the consequences of what will happen in the next 4 years in the next 100 years.
 
Sprafa said:
No, because the World wil suffer the consequences of what will happen in the next 4 years in the next 100 years.

Oh and Bush causes global warming. :|
 
CptStern said:
his enviromental policies sure do help the process

It won't change with Kerry, Clinton backed up the withdrawal from Kyoto.
 
What about the oil tankers that crash at sea and pollute the ocean? Is that Bushes fault? What about the mass garbage around the world? Is that Bushes fault?
 
DiSTuRbEd said:
What about the oil tankers that crash at sea and pollute the ocean? Is that Bushes fault? What about the mass garbage around the world? Is that Bushes fault?


No.

But there will be something very ugly soon, and that will be Bush's fault.


two "not guilty" don't make an innocent
 
Sprafa said:
But there will be something very ugly soon, and that will be Bush's fault.

Sprafa, this isn't helping your case, I highly doubt you can see into the future, so you are just speculating. :|
 
DiSTuRbEd said:
Sprafa, this isn't helping your case, I highly doubt you can see into the future, so you are just speculating. :|

Based off the odds, I can tell you that Bush has a very worst future than Kerry.

Just read my post above, "world_does_not_likes_Bush"
 
DiSTuRbEd said:
What about the oil tankers that crash at sea and pollute the ocean? Is that Bushes fault? What about the mass garbage around the world? Is that Bushes fault?


please! spilling oil tankers hardly makes any sort of impact globally ...not signing the kyoto accords ...that sure as hell makes a large impact

Kerry may not make any sort of short term effect but the republicans have always favoured special interest groups over enviromental issues

here's where kerry stands on enviromental issues

nowhere near enough but it's better than bush's non-existant policies
 
Sprafa said:
Based off the odds, I can tell you that Bush has a very worst future than Kerry.

Yet again, speculation, what odds? I mean seriously, I won't get even started with Kerry.
 
CptStern said:
please! spilling oil tankers hardly makes any sort of impact globally

You really think it hardly makes a difference? What about the fisherman around the world? Oh yeah, we gotta forget about them.
 
relatively few are affected

one could successfully argue that extracting, manufacturing, and processing crude oil has a far greater impact globally
 
But there will be something very ugly soon, and that will be Bush's fault.

If he did'nt:

a. Pull the Trigger
b. Press the Button
c. Give the order,

then its not Bush's fault.
 
K e r b e r o s said:
If he did'nt:

a. Pull the Trigger
b. Press the Button
c. Give the order,

then its not Bush's fault.


using that logic, Hitler is innocent

oh and Bush did give the order
 
oh and Bush did give the order

Were not talking about present tenses, were talking about Sprafas "view on the future".

Using that logic, Hitler is indeed innocent. He personally never killed anyone, but he did put the order to do so. Its based on interpretation.
 
well bush gave the order to invade ...so there's at least 11,000 civilians he's guilty of killing
 
I dont agree ...Bush knew his WMD intelligence was faulty, he knew there was no link to Osama, he knew that saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, he knew he was being a hypocrite when he accused other countries of harbouring terrorists when the US was guilty of doing the same
 
Duh, but all countries have personalised states of terrorism. But the Politics enabled in a country, i.e. the United States lacking to handle "Aryan Nation" supporters, just proves some Governments are more archaic then others.

Its why I believe we should get some of these older folks out of office, simply because they're too afraid to persecute what they were fifty years ago.
 
eve If Bush or Kerry win, it's all still within the plans of the Illuminati.

they've got the world (people) by the ball's.
 
Umm, no they dont. You'll have to get through my home bloodline first!

Germany baby. Leopards! :D
 
K e r b e r o s said:
Duh, but all countries have personalised states of terrorism. But the Politics enabled in a country, i.e. the United States lacking to handle "Aryan Nation" supporters, just proves some Governments are more archaic then others.

Its why I believe we should get some of these older folks out of office, simply because they're too afraid to persecute what they were fifty years ago.

what are you blathering on about?
 
"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." -- Mark Twain
 
Back
Top