Jackson verdict in

Jackson is..

  • Guilty of: Conspiracy involving child abduction, false imprisonment and extortion

    Votes: 7 29.2%
  • Guilty of: Lewd act upon a child under the age of 14

    Votes: 7 29.2%
  • Guilty of: Attempt to get a child under age 14 to commit a lewd act upon [Jackson]

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Guilty of: Administering an intoxicating agent to assist in the commission of child molestation.

    Votes: 9 37.5%
  • Innocent of all charges.

    Votes: 16 66.7%

  • Total voters
    24
He's gonna go downn in flaammeees

Maybe not

MAKE THIS INTO A POLL! LETS SEE WHO LOSES!!
 
Erestheux said:
He's gonna go downn in flaammeees

Maybe not

MAKE THIS INTO A POLL! LETS SEE WHO LOSES!!
No poll needed, just post your opinion. We will know in a couple minutes anyway.
 
what I say doesnt matter ...the media has made it clear they'll brand him as guilty ...honestly I couldnt care either way (except for the victems ..who'll probably sue MJ in a civil court) ..the cult of personality does nothing for me
 
For fun I'll say he's not guilty.

It's too bad though that the media turned the trial into a farce from day one.
 
No Limit said:
No poll needed, just post your opinion. We will know in a couple minutes anyway.
Why is there no poll needed? It would be fun to laugh at who ever is wrong, teehee.

OMG WUT IS IT GONNA BE 4 SUM REASON I AM SUPPOSED 2 CARE BUT I DONT LOL!
 
CptStern said:
what I say doesnt matter ...the media has made it clear they'll brand him as guilty ...honestly I couldnt care either way (except for the victems ..who'll probably sue MJ in a civil court) ..the cult of personality does nothing for me
Well the family said they wont go after a civil suit. I still think they will become rich off this.
 
I don't know, I don't care, but some of those "supporters" are just as crazy and strange as he is. I saw a news segment of about twenty of them dancing in lines to his music and imitating his dances. Very strange and sad at the same time.

What must be going through someone's head to take all this time off of work to stand outside and support this guy? To each their own though.


edited: I'll play along though even though I don't care and say guilty on all counts.
 
Not guilty of abusing minors, but he's probably guilty of giving them alcohol tbh, he's a complete nutcase. They should sentence him to psychiatric care, really.

Anyway, it'll probably go not guilty on all charges.
 
He's not guilty guys.

I think he's 100% guilty.
 
It's official: not guilty on all counts.

Just heard it on a live feed from the bbc website.
 
If this was a normal man... he'd be so guilty by the jury.

This is what celebrity status gets you, people... the ability to sleep with children admittedly, and get away with it.

I hope he gets permanently branded for life as a child molester... HE SLEEPS with children. Any normal person, and they'd be marked as a sex offender and be required to be registered as such.
 
Raziaar said:
If this was a normal man... he'd be so guilty by the jury.

This is what celebrity status gets you, people... the ability to sleep with children admittedly, and get away with it.

I hope he gets permanently branded for life as a child molester... HE SLEEPS with children. Any normal person, and they'd be marked as a sex offender and be required to be registered as such.
I'm glad you are above everyone in that jury and know damn well he did it. Can I have your powers too?
 
No Limit said:
I'm glad you are above everyone in that jury and know damn well he did it. Can I have your powers too?

The simple fact that he admits to sleeping in the same bed as children that are not his... and calling it "A beautiful thing".

His words, not mine. He admitted to sleeping with children, and defended it.
 
Well I personally think he is innocent (of paedophillia), but just a very silly man. In the world we live in he treats children as these innocent beings who he can play with and be nice to etc and everyone automatically assumes he has some kind of hidden agenda. Even the kids now it would seem are trying to find ways to screw him out of money...
 
Raziaar said:
The simple fact that he admits to sleeping in the same bed as children that are not his... and calling it "A beautiful thing".

His words, not mine. He admitted to sleeping with children, and defended it.

I guess young children sleeping in the same bed as their parents is paedophilia as well?
 
KagePrototype said:
I guess young children sleeping in the same bed as their parents is paedophilia as well?

You act like he forced them to sleep in the same bed as him, which it turns out didn't happen.

The problem is that he is not their parents... and he gives them "Jesus Juice" :p
 
KagePrototype said:
I guess young children sleeping in the same bed as their parents is paedophilia as well?

Notice that I said children that are 'not his'? They have absolutely no relation to him. Yet he seems content to get intimately close to them, naked in bed. <shrugs> I guess if we consider that reasonable in this world... its kind of a nutty world.
 
Just looking at the guy makes you think he's a paedo, but there's no way he would survive all these trials if he was guilty.

Raziaar said:
Notice that I said children that are 'not his'? They have absolutely no relation to him. Yet he seems content to get intimately close to them, naked in bed. <shrugs> I guess if we consider that reasonable in this world... its kind of a nutty world.
They never said he was naked. And children sleeping in the same bedroom as him isn't weird, since Macaulay Culkin said that his bedroom takes up like 2 or 3 floors of his mansion.
 
Computer5k said:
The problem is that he is not their parents... and he gives them "Jesus Juice" :p

Yeah... um.. he's been found innocent of that by a jury of his peers. The dude didn't even have sex to get his wife pregnant, so what makes you think he even has 'Jesus Juice'?? IMO he's probably a eunoch, which is why he can reach those high notes.
 
Raziaar said:
Notice that I said children that are 'not his'? They have absolutely no relation to him. Yet he seems content to get intimately close to them, naked in bed. <shrugs> I guess if we consider that reasonable in this world... its kind of a nutty world.

What the hell, naked? Intimately? Where did you pull those from?
 
Raziaar said:
Notice that I said children that are 'not his'? They have absolutely no relation to him. Yet he seems content to get intimately close to them, naked in bed. <shrugs> I guess if we consider that reasonable in this world... its kind of a nutty world.

Erm, he wasn't naked and he's even stated that he slept in the same room, but not the same bed!

What you've gotta realise is that this dude has had a WIERD (for want of a better word) life-style. From the age of 4 he was doing a full time job and has basically regressed from being an adult very young to doing childish things as an older man.. (basically the opposite way that everyone else does it).
 
KagePrototype said:
What the hell, naked? Intimately? Where did you pull those from?

Well, unless he actually sleeps in adult sized children pajamas, I imigine he sleeps in either his underwear or naked.

And intimately... thats more something coming from me. I can only find the act of an unrelated, old man, sleeping in the same bed, next to children, an intimate and disturbing act.
 
Raziaar said:
Well, unless he actually sleeps in adult sized children pajamas, I imigine he sleeps in either his underwear or naked.

And intimately... thats more something coming from me. I can only find the act of an unrelated, old man, sleeping in the same bed, next to children, an intimate and disturbing act.
You saw his pajamas when he was walking into the trial, they covered all of his legs at least... haha.
 
I think he is guilty on some but not all but the jury thought differently.
 
Raziaar said:
Well, unless he actually sleeps in adult sized children pajamas, I imigine he sleeps in either his underwear or naked.

There is such a thing as adult pajamas, y'know.

And intimately... thats more something coming from me. I can only find the act of an unrelated, old man, sleeping in the same bed, next to children, an intimate and disturbing act.

Why are you so quick to judge him? He's even been proven innocent now, surely this is enough?
 
KagePrototype said:
There is such a thing as adult pajamas, y'know.



Why are you so quick to judge him? He's even been proven innocent now, surely this is enough?

Since when is our justice system always to be trusted? Everybody speaks out against it, even I think its flawed... and in this case, it was definately flawed.

I'm not 'quick' to judge him. These allegations have been going on for many many years, buddy. I've formed my own opinion on him, and I don't think he is a safe man when it comes to children.
 
Shit, he is "not guilty." I lose.

I bet that jury made him come in his pajamas.
 
Looks like MJ can join in on OJ's fun. MJ? OJ? Can you say conspiracy!!!!!
 
I say he's found not guilty. Oh wait, I'm right. I'm always right.

:god:
 
Raziaar said:
The simple fact that he admits to sleeping in the same bed as children that are not his... and calling it "A beautiful thing".

His words, not mine. He admitted to sleeping with children, and defended it.
Last time I checked the charges against him were not that he is weird. Those wore the charges made by the media and I certainly think he is guilty in that regard. As for being guilty of the real charges I honestly don't know, what I know is that there is too much reasonable doubt to convict him so I certainly agree with the jury.
 
Raziaar said:
Well, unless he actually sleeps in adult sized children pajamas, I imigine he sleeps in either his underwear or naked.

And intimately... thats more something coming from me. I can only find the act of an unrelated, old man, sleeping in the same bed, next to children, an intimate and disturbing act.
He sleeps in adult sized pajamas like so many here in America do. I don't know where you pulled that from.
 
hmmm now all he has to worry about is his $300m dept
 
Raziaar said:
Since when is our justice system always to be trusted? Everybody speaks out against it, even I think its flawed... and in this case, it was definately flawed.
I wish republicans would be as quick to judge the justice system when a innocent black person gets convicted. Never hear an outrage from them on that.
 
Back
Top