The Mullinator
Newbie
- Joined
- May 24, 2003
- Messages
- 5,794
- Reaction score
- 0
Well those new pictures look much more realistic and they certainly look good. I also like how it looks as if it was made to resemble one of the NES's original cartridges.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No one knows yet.Razor said:What was so revolutionary about it?
I agree. Nintendos measurement of power probably comes as an idea of image improvement, revolution games will look 3-4 times better than game cube games. Meanwhile Sony and Microsoft are claiming pure processing power so they can stretch the truth. fact is though 30 times as powerful will probably only translate to 3-4 times better looking.Lt. Drebin said:Nintendo has stated countless times that the Rev will be, for the most part, on par with the other two. If I didn't think Sony and MS are usually full of shit I might be inclined to call their achievments overkill for the next-gen, but since I don't believe a word they say, particularly Sony, I'll take their comments in stride. Nintendo is not run by a bunch of morons...they recognize the need for great games foremost, but they certainly don't disregard the need for powerful hardware....see Nintendo 64. I have no fear that the Revolution will be on par and able to run all the games that appear on the other two consoles.
So what if it is a render? Does it make a difference whether it's a 3D model of the console's design (far easier to take a good picture of, IMHO) or a photo??The Mullinator said:I would also call that picture bullshit. It definitaly doesn't look real at all, far too much like a render.
MuToiD_MaN said:My money is on Nintendo's console being/becoming the cheapest, so they can market to the younger crowd as usual.
not in sales anyway.MuToiD_MaN said:Peh. All consoles will be dwarfed by PC's two years from now anyway :thumbs: All I really hope is that Microsoft never buys out one of the two companies (like that would ever happen). If that happens, I'll assassinate Emperor Gates myself.
xlucidx said:RIP
Nintendo
198? - 2005
Takaitokuten said:Have any of you seen footage or screens from Revolutions software... uhh... No, You haven't.
[*text cut to reduce quote size*]
Just because a console is more powerful than another, by no means does that make the games better.
Actually I thought the PS3 was the best looking.Reginald said:1889 - 2005. But I doubt this will be the death of Nintenod. It's actually the best looking console of the three. And we haven't seen the true Revolution yet... Bear in mind that the controller could have all the MP3 mumbo jumbo on it.
Who ever said that was going to be the revolutionary part? They said the revolutionary part will be in how we play games and that it would be completely different from the other consoles. If that is the revolutionary part I will eat my hat after I drop it in dung.lePobz said:Bigger pic here
"Revolution will be "two-to-three times more powerful than GameCube," according to Nintendo"
Is that supposed to be a good thing?
"Nintendo also revealed that using Revolution's new Wi-Fi connection, gamers would be able to go online to a free gamer-matching service. Interestingly, in a move similar to Microsoft's Xbox Live Arcade service, Revolution users will be able to download classic and new Nintendo games over the Internet"
Wow, truely a revolution indeed!
Seriously, have Nintendo been living under a rock on the dark side of the moon for the past 5 years? This is far from a revolution.
I'll believe that when I see it. What people want and expect these days is device convergence. If it doesnt play games, organise your fridge and do your laundry for you, its not good enough.Direwolf said:I don't think Nintendo is shooting for being number two or three this time around. They're gunning for number one, and are laying a whole hell of a lot on the line in order to achieve that. And they're going to do it by making their own category, which will be much different than where Sony and Microsoft are going.
Notice this thing isn't an "entertainment hub." They're not running around claiming how it can accept your flash cards, record movies, or any other such nonsense. They're gonna make this thing for playing games, and they're gonna do it cheaply and effectively.
That's the EXACT same thing they said last time. And look how well the Gamecube turned out! (I actually did love the system and it was my favorite console of the 3, but the average consumer didn't.)They're gonna make this thing for playing games, and they're gonna do it cheaply and effectively.
The Mullinator said:Who ever said that was going to be the revolutionary part? They said the revolutionary part will be in how we play games and that it would be completely different from the other consoles. If that is the revolutionary part I will eat my hat after I drop it in dung.
lePobz said:Bigger pic here
"Revolution will be "two-to-three times more powerful than GameCube," according to Nintendo"
Is that supposed to be a good thing?
"Nintendo also revealed that using Revolution's new Wi-Fi connection, gamers would be able to go online to a free gamer-matching service. Interestingly, in a move similar to Microsoft's Xbox Live Arcade service, Revolution users will be able to download classic and new Nintendo games over the Internet"
Wow, truely a revolution indeed!
Seriously, have Nintendo been living under a rock on the dark side of the moon for the past 5 years? This is far from a revolution.
Graphics-wise, the Gamecube beat the PS2 into the ground with a serrated baseball bat.Chav said:wow 2 times as powerfull, just think how much power that makes
0 power * 2 = 0 power :bounce:
Narcolepsy said:Graphics-wise, the Gamecube beat the PS2 into the ground with a serrated baseball bat.
Gameplay-wise, that's another story. It used something much more painful.
Narcolepsy said:Graphics-wise, the Gamecube beat the PS2 into the ground with a serrated baseball bat.
Gameplay-wise, that's another story. It used something much more painful.
Chav said:I totally NOT agree with you exept on the gameplay-wise.
Gamecube was the baddest console out there in my oppinion.
Narcolepsy said:Graphics-wise, the Gamecube beat the PS2 into the ground with a serrated baseball bat.
Gameplay-wise, that's another story. It used something much more painful.
SimonomiS said:Woah, they were going for sleek, and thats sleek as ****.
Don't like the vertical blackness though, too much like the PS2.
In the back of my mind I was hoping for something like that would spin the gaming world on its head, like Nintendo ON or a floating orb...
*welds Reginalds agreeing box*
Reginald said:Good. I don't want to agree with that
I want to see the controller though. I can't wait... I'm so excited!
SimonomiS said:Gah, don't get my hopes up or it'll end up like the PS3 controller.
Thats actually a good thing. Nintendo made a decent amount of money this console generation from that philosophy, and brought us some of the best games they ever have. If it's gonna be another gamecube, then I'm looking forward to it.Narcolepsy said:That's the EXACT same thing they said last time. And look how well the Gamecube turned out!
Chav said:PS1 + 2 controller was and is great
lePobz said:"Revolution will be "two-to-three times more powerful than GameCube," according to Nintendo"
Is that supposed to be a good thing?