Sparta
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2003
- Messages
- 6,312
- Reaction score
- 0
Saving Private Ryan was too patriotic for my liking. Even though it was losely based on real events, it struck me as a little contrived and far fetched - an exercise in tugging at your heart strings. Band of Brothers was better.
I don't see the cliches you talk of in Glory and Platoon. Both are centered on wonderful charatcers (something I didn't find in SPR), their lives, but not the war - just how it affects them. With Black Hawk Down and, to a lesser extent, SPR, it seemed like the charatcers were shoehorned in as an afterthought.
Band of Brothers is definitely far better than Saving Private Ryan, i'm with you there. I love SPR but you can't compare a mini-series to a film fairly. As for Glory, Platoon and SPR, I see them as all on equal terms when it comes to their characters. Every character seems to get its fair share of the drama and the only ones i really found contrived are Willem Dafoe and Tom Berenger. Those two were so obviously the "good" and "bad" characters in the film that they stuck out like sore thumbs. Also i thought Platoon was trying too hard to be Apocalypse Now's little brother. As for Glory... well its probably just my prejudice against the director who made the film, because that guy always has to make films where white people save other cultures. Glory, Last Samurai, Blood Diamond, all those films fit the archetype established with Glory, which i didn't think much of.