Which presidental canidate would you vote for?

Who's your choice?


  • Total voters
    124
Btw Moonraker, your candidate Rudy Giuliani don't have any problem with theory of evolution and he strongly disagree with teaching of creationism in schools...unlike rest of republicans.
 
Evolution is not a fact, it's a theory, a substantiated theory, but still a theory. A theory is an explanation, of observations/data. In science a fact is something like a mass or a distance.
 
Evolution is not a fact, it's a theory, a substantiated theory, but still a theory. A theory is an explanation, of observations/data. In science a fact is something like a mass or a distance.

Granted its a theory, but its been proven within 99.9999% so it might as well be fact.
 
Science has to be skeptical, it can never assume it's definitely correct.
 
Why is it that creation is the only other theory used besides evolution. I think its more likely that an alien race came to earth, created humans, and left....as opposed to an invisible deity in clouds creating everything.

That should be the third theory, ill call it....The Aliens came to earth and pooped out humans and left theory
 
Why is it that creation is the only other theory used besides evolution. I think its more likely that an alien race came to earth, created humans, and left....as opposed to an invisible deity in clouds creating everything.

That should be the third theory, ill call it....The Aliens came to earth and pooped out humans and left theory

Panspermia/deism?
 
Funnily enough, the only Iowan district Ron Paul won was the district with the University of Iowa. ^^
 
Obama. This country needs a little shaking up (in a good way mind you).

I will look into this Ron Paul character more though--I don't know enough about him....
 
Yes delusional. I like Ron Paul.

And he IS the only one with a steady record.


If it's Obama vs Huckabee, it's a tough choice. Obama has youthful enthusiasim, but youthful stupidity too. Huckabee is intelgent, but only on things he knows (which isn't alot)

It's like choosing between 1 month old cheese, or 1 month old milk. You get the same thing, each with it's sourness.
 
You had to be watching the news. He didn't know about the writers strike. Theres a few other things which suggest he's simply ignorant on the facts of some things.
 
You had to be watching the news. He didn't know about the writers strike. Theres a few other things which suggest he's simply ignorant on the facts of some things.

Where in the hell does the writers strike come in, you said he was intelligent, but also ignorant. it doesn't make sense.
 
He's intelligent on only things he knows about to exist. everything else he's completely ignorant on.(which is a wide range of things from Iran to the Writer's Strike.)

he has no "I think". he either knows or doesn't

I don't know, maybe it's just my wording of it. You have to watch his speeches and interviews to see what i mean.
 
He's intelligent on only things he knows about to exist. everything else he's completely ignorant on.(which is a wide range of things from Iran to the Writer's Strike.)

he has no "I think". he either knows or doesn't

I don't know, maybe it's just my wording of it. You have to watch his speeches and interviews to see what i mean.

You should learn proper sentence structure since it's a pain to understand what you are saying.

Being ignorant on things that are extremely important in politics doesn't make him intelligent, it means he's ignorant. he can't be both.
 
no, he's intelligent on thing that people care about. I think this makes him kind of a panhandler.

Huckabee isn't the smartest, but he's not Bush, so that can only be better.
 
How do you figure? You're basically saying the one thing that can prove creationism is false cant prove its false.

Not at all, that's a very narrow-minded approach, the same narrow minded approach most Christians take.

Presuming the existence of God, what would stop God from creating creatures that physically change, adapt, and evolve. There are other ways God can co-exist with evolution, even if you presume creatures all started as microbes and eventually ended up where we are today. If creationists were on top of things, they would use evolution as "evidence of God's genius in his creation." Instead they shun everything related to evolution, and inadvertently are hurting their cause, basically putting their faith on the line over a scientific issue (like the world being flat).

There are major holes in Darwinian evolution theory that haven't been filled yet, so even from a scientific perspective it's ludicrous to put it on the same level as gravitational theory.
 
There are major holes in Darwinian evolution theory that haven't been filled yet, so even from a scientific perspective it's ludicrous to put it on the same level as gravitational theory.
I'm not sure about MAJOR holes but even gravitational theory have some "holes" like hypothetical graviton particles etc.
Evolution theory is corner stone of modern biology, medicine and other fields of science and it's absolutely disgusting when people like politicians want to replace modern science with biblical myths.
 
Obama definently. He got more women voters in the Iowa Democratcs than Hillary. Hell Hillary got 3rd!! She might as well run in the special olympics. She's a bitch.
 
why are you going based off what others voted? THAT'S HOW BUSH WAS ELECTED!

History DOES repeat itself.
 
What?? I've had my mind made up about Obama for a while now.
 
There are major holes in Darwinian evolution theory that haven't been filled yet, so even from a scientific perspective it's ludicrous to put it on the same level as gravitational theory.

What holes?

No scientific theory is perfect, but its going to take some pretty damn big holes to sink Natural Selection.
 
sorry cole, you said
He got more women voters in the Iowa Democratcs than Hillary.

i thought you meant you were basing your vote based off others. But whatever. If it turns out to be guliani vs Obama, I'd rather Obama.
 
I'd like to announce that halflife2.net is the proud home of at least 7 Hillary loving feminazis.
 
But that's liek, an oxymoron. How can a video game player be for that bitch????
NOTE: LOL, did anyone notice how she was all serious and angry looking after she lost? SHe was laughing and care free only 2 days ago. HEHEHE. Can't handle stress? How will she handle the presidency?
 
not yet, but in the next election I will.

Why does it matter. It says who "would" you vote for in the topic, no who you "will". I don't see you yelling at all the Europeans on this? they can't vote if their not us citizens.

I would vote for Ron Paul if I could.
 
Major holes meaning large portions of the theory that are very unknown. Holes don't imply evidence for or against it. I thought I already established that evolution does exist on at least some level. Regardless that's not my point, my point was that evolution and creation are not mutually exclusive.
 
I swear to god if someone uses government resourses to counter "Global Warming" I'm gonna have to kill myself.... What a worthless waste of resourses. used to end a political stance, not an actual phenominon.
 
Anyone using government resources to pro/against global warming won't get my vote. It's a scientific issue that's been overloaded by politics.
 
Although it's a scientific issue, it's not a totallly academic issue. If Science says it's happening, surely the Government must work to reduce it?
 
Back
Top