Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
my eyes are open, I see both sides ..as they truely are
GiaOmerta said:Alright. Well, I guess we'll have to leave.
Put Saddam back in power. Give him 10 billion dollars, hell more than that.
Nah, we wont have to do that because the Iraqi people will be able to using the power of democracy.meh in a few years you'll have to come back to overthrow PM Allawi for being "evil" and possessing WMD
Allawi kills his opposition!!
Allawi works for the US
CptStern said:hilarious! he still works for the CIA ..who gave the US false information that saddam had gone to Niger?, who gave the US false information that saddam was capable of launching missles at the UK in 45 minutes? Who gave the US false information that saddam was behind 9/11? Allawi Allawi Allawi!!!
GiaOmerta said:If Allawi wanted to dispose of Saddam why would he hinder the US from finding him?
Missles in 45 minutes, wtf?
Where are you getting your information Cap'n? Honestly.
Osama Bin Laden is based in Sarajevo, Bosnia.
That statement holds as much light as your crude statements.
and of course people are going to bitch and complain that's what we, as a species do best.
:sniper: :x ----=>
..but dont take my word for it here's what some iraqis had to say:
"Allawi is a traitor to the people of Iraq, said Dr. Um Mohammed who works at a hospital in Baghdad. ”He is an American puppet who enjoys the killing of Iraqis.” A trader in central Baghdad Abdel Hakim Abdulla said Allawi has ”never made a decision that benefits Iraqis.”
”Ayad Allawi says we are his family,” said Mohammad Ali, a 53-year-old refugee wounded by U.S. bombs in his home in Fallujah. ”Can you attack your family, Allawi? Do you attack your own family, Allawi?”
seinfeldrules said:And I'm sure you will also post some quotes from Iraqis that agree with him as a leader. Once you accomplish this, I will read your links.
He'd just be posting a reasonable argument. Nothing wrong with that.Then he'd be debating against himself. It's up to other people to back up their statements, not his.
seinfeldrules said:He'd just be posting a reasonable argument. Nothing wrong with that.
Doesnt really say if they like him or not. They clearly dont approve of the cabinet, but the poll didnt ask about Allawi himself. Seems most Iraqis do support ridding themselves of the resistance though.But the researchers from the center found that the Iraqi public has little faith in the new interim government of Ayad Allawi, with only 27 percent approving the formation of his cabinet.
However, more than two thirds (81 percent) said they would like Allawi’s government to disarm local militias or bring them under its control.
But more than half believed that the forthcoming general elections would be “just and fair” while only 18 percent said they would be “unfair.”
However, more than two thirds (81 percent) said they would like Allawi’s government to disarm local militias or bring them under its control.
And 66 percent of Iraqis objected to the presence of foreign troops while only 29 percent said their presence was necessary.
An even lesser number – 41 percent – said they would feel safe if the troops left.
seinfeldrules said:And I'm sure you will also post some quotes from Iraqis that agree with him as a leader. Once you accomplish this, I will read your links.
"Allawi had the greatest name recognition of any politician, with 47 percent of Iraqis supporting him for a seat in the new parliament. But rebel Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr came in a very close third, with 46 percent backing him for an assembly seat."
seinfeldrules said:How did Sadr come in third with 46%? That is mathematically impossible.
haha I see now. They were referring to how many people recognized his name, not how many would vote for him. That little clipping was misleading.burner69 said:The US creating a new way to display election results, in their unstoppable rise to world domination. Probably :O
In an interview with Abu Dhabi television, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said yesterday that Iraqis want democracy and are unlikely to go "from one form of totalitarian state to another form of totalitarian state." Both U.S. officials and Iraq experts note that the rise of Islamic parties does not necessarily mean creation of an Islamic government or theocracy such as Iran's.
President Bush said Tuesday that he would be "disappointed" if free and fair elections in Iraq led to the seating of an Islamic government, but that the United States would accept the results. "Democracy is democracy," he said. "If that's what people choose, that's what the people choose."
Doesn't allawi have an international warrent against him by interpoll.
(I'm not sure about this, I think I read it somewhere)
seinfeldrules said:haha I see now. They were referring to how many people recognized his name, not how many would vote for him. That little clipping was misleading.
hasan said:man why the hell do bushists think they have the right to speak in the name of MY people?! stfu.
man you're gullible as if the US is going to spend billions to further their cause and then abandon it altogether and leave the elections to chance? we'll see what happens after the elections
Man can it, I have as much right to post what I do as you do. This isnt the Saddam regime.man why the hell do bushists think they have the right to speak in the name of MY people?! stfu.
GiaOmerta said:Reclaiming Babylon in the name of Alexander the Great.
Allah had it for long enough.
seinfeldrules said:To each his own. Bush said it, not me.