seinfeldrules
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2003
- Messages
- 3,385
- Reaction score
- 0
what did you expect him to say?
It would be well within his power to delay the elections, citing terrorist threats. He has not done so yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
what did you expect him to say?
I'm Sicilian-Naplian American. Modern-day Roman...CptStern said:so now your macedonian?
you can't speak in the name of my people .. you can't tell me "but omg iraqis like us!!!11" cuz we don't.seinfeldrules said:Man can it, I have as much right to post what I do as you do. This isnt the Saddam regime.
omg your arguments are irrefutable!!! bush said it! it HAS to be true!!!!111To each his own. Bush said it, not me. An overwhelming number of the Iraqi people want to vote, something they could never do before.
oh please .. no religous slurs.Allah had it for long enough.
notice that is a christian website .. not an islamic one.Some Christians unthinkingly say 'Allah is not God.' (...) But for more than five hundred years before Muhammad, the vast majority of Jews and Christians in Arabia called God by the name Allah. How, then, can we say that Allah is an invalid name for God? If it is, to whom have these Jews and Christians been praying?
And what about the 10 to 12 million Arab Christians today? They have been calling God 'Allah' in their Bibles, hymns, poems, writings, and worship for over nineteen centuries. What an insult to them when we tell them not to use this word 'Allah'!
What's the difference between "location" and nationality? (5 marks)Location: Calgary, Canada
Maybe you should relocate and do something about it.
Since when have I ever used wording like that? You are the one using 'cuz'...you can't speak in the name of my people .. you can't tell me "but omg iraqis like us!!!11" cuz we don't.
rofl .. you can say what you want under saddam too, as long as he doesn't get mad!this isnt Saddam's regime running the place, I can say what I want (as long as the mods dont get mad).
as far as I can tell, that website is associated with the gov't appointed by the occupation. (haven't really looked at it in depth)I'm using the information gathered from an Iraqi poll from an Iraqi website.
Still Iraqi, I'm pretty sure the UN backed it as well...as far as I can tell, that website is associated with the gov't appointed by the occupation. (haven't really looked at it in depth)
so? ...seinfeldrules said:Still Iraqi, I'm pretty sure the UN backed it as well...
Good point. They dont count anyways. What was I thinking using hte UN :xhasan said:so? ...
hasan said:What's the difference between "location" and nationality? (5 marks)
how I hate it when people use such arguments ..GiaOmerta said:Figured maybe moving to your homeland and doing something about all this would make you happy.
hasan said:how I hate it when people use such arguments ..
GiaOmerta said:I hate civilians
And I suppose you're in Iraq helping all the innocent civilians recover from the evil US invasion. Bye bye good luck, dont catch one in the face.GiaOmerta, I suppose you're at the recruiting office right now signing up to support your country ..bye bye good luck dont shoot any civilians
seinfeldrules said:And I suppose you're in Iraq helping all the innocent civilians recover from the evil US invasion. Bye bye good luck, dont catch one in the face.
what have you done to support your ideology? sitting at your computer getting mad at the liberals doesnt count ...you want a career in intelligence Iraq's your opportunity
Hmmm...I've always thought of demonstrating as glorified whining.CptStern said:I'm older than 31 and I have a family and yes I do help the iraqi people by demonstrating. Where were you when I was standing for 6 hours in -20 C weather protesting the coming invasion of the US?
Where were you when I was standing for 6 hours in -20 C weather protesting the coming invasion of the US?
seinfeldrules said:Probably at home agreeing with the imminent war while watching TV. Its not like I was going to protest a war I agreed with.
seinfeldrules said:Answer me this, how many times did you demonstrate against Saddam and his genocidal ways?
well when saddam was doing his worst atrocities it was the 80's and I probably didnt know who he was ...remember, saddam was an "ally" of the US at that time, all references to his brutality where swept under the table
There were no real pro war rallies in my area. I saw this website that you can purchase Iraqi currency from. Its like an investment in the future of Iraq. The money does well, your profits increase as their value goes up. If it stalls, then so does your money. I'm thinking about purchasing some once I save up a little more.I also meant: what were you doing to support the war effort
seinfeldrules said:What a lame excuse to get out of that one. Blaming the US for your lack of knowledge, what a suprise. What were you doing in the 90s when you did learn of the genocide?
seinfeldrules said:There were no real pro war rallies in my area. I saw this website that you can purchase Iraqi currency from. Its like an investment in the future of Iraq. The money does well, your profits increase as their value goes up. If it stalls, then so does your money. I'm thinking about purchasing some once I save up a little more.
Audiophile said:I thought it was a great film as well, but you have to understand that it was heavily slanted to the left.
Far better than the pathetic response, Farenhype 9/11.
pfft .. I hated bush looong before I even heared about michael moore.if you dont like bush, figure out your own reasons why. dont let it be because you watched this pile of shit film. do some research. educate yourself. hell, when mikey calls you 'ignorant', you know you're in bad shape.
othello said:i think 'pathetic' is a bit strong here. it was pretty simple. kind of like 'hey, he's lying, here's the proof... roll credits'. i've already had many, many bush discussions on these boards, so i wont get into that aspect. suffice to say, anyone who bought/buys into michael moore's ridiculous and easily refuted bullshit is in a sad, and 'pathetic', intellectual state. BFC was a better documentary, true, but it was still chalked full of deceit and distortion and clever editing... though not nearly to the extent of F9/11. mikey couldnt even be honest in Roger & Me... the very first 'documentary' he ever made. he's a clever bastard, exploiting the ignorance and uneducation of the world... but he's more of a hypocritical and narcissistic propogandist with absolutely no political savvy and some very weak talking points.
if you dont like bush, figure out your own reasons why. dont let it be because you watched this pile of shit film. do some research. educate yourself. hell, when mikey calls you 'ignorant', you know you're in bad shape. :thumbs:
meh you're already supporting the war effort ..to the tune of $3,400 in taxes not too mention gas prices, insurance, safety etc etc
Supported the war.so what did you do to protest Saddam's reign of tyranny?
hey at least when Moore lies whole countries dont get invaded. BTW I want proof that Moore is a liar, and dont even dare give me any links by gun-nut Dave Kopel
seinfeldrules said:My family pays around 5,000 a year and we are pretty much the average American family. The figure given is hugely flawed and I've said that before
Supported the war.
Thats such a flawed argument. You cant explain away his reasoning so you dismiss him, what a suprise.
I was motivated by 9/11. I am not suggesting that Saddam played a role in it, I also knew that at the time. I was worried that WMD could fall into the hands of terrorists and they may use them to hit NYC or Wash. DC. It was too large a threat to ignore. I still feel it was too large a threat to ignore based off the intelligence reports given to Bush by the top intel. agencies across the globe. In another 5 years, Saddam could have easily had WMD and the whole situation could have gotten out of control. I did think of the humanitarian benefits as well. In my mind at the time it was a 75/25 split between WMD and humanitarian.And when you did support it, was it because of the fear tactics of the 45min WMD, the falsely implied terrorist links, or the one good reason to invade; he's an evil dictator.
What about Dan Rather and CBS as a quick example? How about all the Hollywood actors? What of the NYT and many other major newspapers (LAT, SFC)?Moore is not brilliant, he's a propaganderist (sp?) in his own right, but seeing as there are so few like him, I think he's got the right to do it. Give the polar extreme of the stuff you see on FOX and hear from Bush.
seinfeldrules said:My family pays around 5,000 a year and we are pretty much the average American family. The figure given is hugely flawed and I've said that before
seinfeldrules said:Supported the war.
seinfeldrules said:Thats such a flawed argument. You cant explain away his reasoning so you dismiss him, what a suprise.
proof?
I already answered that question, I'm not going to do so again.how exactly? by talking about it here?
And Moore takes the exact opposite approach, you cant use him anymore and we can no longer discuss F 9/11. I suppose this topic should be closed as well as any others that may spring up.no, that's a very valid reason, he's a gun advocate who writes a lot of articles that support gun ownership .."conflict of interest" springs to mind
seinfeldrules said:I was motivated by 9/11. I am not suggesting that Saddam played a role in it, I also knew that at the time. I was worried that WMD could fall into the hands of terrorists and they may use them to hit NYC or Wash. DC.
seinfeldrules said:It was too large a threat to ignore. I still feel it was too large a threat to ignore based off the intelligence reports given to Bush by the top intel. agencies across the globe.
seinfeldrules said:In another 5 years, Saddam could have easily had WMD and the whole situation could have gotten out of control.
seinfeldrules said:I did think of the humanitarian benefits as well. In my mind at the time it was a 75/25 split between WMD and humanitarian.
seinfeldrules said:Sorry, I'm not in the habit of posting my family's tax return online. I can assure you that both my parents are accountants and I specifically asked them how much money they paid last year to the Fed. Gov't.
seinfeldrules said:I already answered that question, I'm not going to do so again.
seinfeldrules said:And Moore takes the exact opposite approach, you cant use him anymore and we can no longer discuss F 9/11. I suppose this topic should be closed as well as any others that may spring up.
Tell me Seinfeld, just out of curiosity, the fact that the state which was hardest hit by the terror attacs (9/11) massivly voted against Bush, in other words against the Iraq war and his way of fighting terrorism, does that even make you think, I mean just a littlebit.
moore doesnt have "conflict of interest" not unless he has time-share condos in baghdad or something ..Kopel does have a legitamate conflict of interest ..he makes his living advocating gun laws. It can be argues that F9/11 hurt Moore's career ..in fact I doubt few studios ill touch him besides the usually upstarts
My parents pay more than 50% of their taxes to the war in Iraq? So do 100 million other families? Ok, explain the logic in that. The figure is just a scare number, just like the 100,000 civilians killed.no you simpleton, I meant show proof that the figure was inflated
Suggest some things I could have done to show support for the war. Sorry, but there werent any pro war rallies around me that I could have attended.in other words you did nothing
CptStern said:hey at least when Moore lies whole countries dont get invaded. BTW I want proof that Moore is a liar, and dont even dare give me any links by gun-nut Dave Kopel