Icarusintel
Newbie
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2004
- Messages
- 5,302
- Reaction score
- 0
Kim Jong Il, best name everabout mr. jim kong or whatever his name is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Kim Jong Il, best name everabout mr. jim kong or whatever his name is.
That global security article was pretty crap.Read that ideology article I posted. It's a fairly deep insight.
They are brainwashed practically from birth, the education system is more concerned with telling them about how great North Korea is than about teaching them anything, and they have no real idea what the outside world is like. According to the history they are taught, NK is the greatest country on earth and they also won the Korean War. They have absolutely no contact with and barely any knowledge of the outside world. The country is really like one giant cult.
That global security article was pretty crap.
Claiming North Korea is Marixist-Lenninist is laughable.
Korea's military capabilities are shit, they may have a million soldiers. But they are underfed, and they are not so much loyal because they beleive in the cause, they are loyal because of fear, and fear is not a great motieve to fight. This is not vietnam, thease peoples hopes are allready crushed beyond believe. South Korea could take them on alone without Nukes involved.
And can anyone tell me why we are not dealing with NK, I can understand, even if I do not agree with the lack of involvement in country's like sudan, because they just **** their own people over. But Nk has been activly blackmailing the rest of the world for years now. When are they going to be stopped. Or is the wests fault, and our embargo's against NK, is there any hope of NK going the way of the rest of asia if the embargo's are lifted. I mean it's better if we do something now until the situation gets so out of control, that Sk and Japan won't be anything more then piles of ashes.
doesnt seem to work in iraq
Numbers said:It's time to break out the rod and start the discipline
Numbers said:It's certainly insane enough. I sometimes think that they just want to go on a mass killing spree before they're brought down.
They're very... volatile. Make no mistake about that. We can't predict anything of their actions.
Yeah, I hate nukes. Thats why I want NK's military installations completely and irreversably destroyed.
And anyway, just like the Italian M40 tank, the nuclear bunker buster is one of those things that make you say: "Why the hell di they make this anyway?"
volatile and suicidal are two different things
the US military has nukes in your neck of the woods right? 9or at the very least military installations well prepared to strike if the need should arise) ...certainly you can see how a nation has a legitimate claim to self defense ...no? if the war in iraq has taught us anything it's that the only thing that will deter america is nukes (so long as you already have them) ...good job america
because people like you allow it to happen "we must be ever vigilent, we must meet our enemies with gun in hand, we must kill them before they kill us" etc ..you can also hear the multi-nat corporations/weapons manufacturers wringing their hands in anticipated glee. Fear mongering = carte blanche to do pretty much whatever the hell you want
Perhaps, but volatile and unpredictable can lead to suicidal things.
NK has enough troops to ensure at the very least, America doesn't attack. And besides, America won't attack without our go, and we won't give a go unless they do something stupid. Again. Also, they don't need nuclear weapons; their arsenal of chemical and biological weapons that can be fired by long-range artillery is one of the biggest in the world, and can destroy 40% of our capital in just one hour. In which 10 million people live in.
People like me encourage the building of USEFUL weapons that actually do what they're supposed to do. So, not really.
maybe individually yes but you'd have a hard time proving it exists institutionally
so then nukes is the least of your worries, meaning this thread is pretty much useless
is it common for militaries to develop weapons that are useless? ...iright into full production? wow they're dumber than I thought
......yes.
Hey, nukes do more damage than chems.
Only stupid militaries that are inefficient.
well then your point is moot
yes but both would bring international response ..in any event it's very clear they have no intention of using their nukes ...I mean even israel could oblierate them before they fired a second volley
militaries dont manufacture the weapons themselves ..that's what companies like General Electric, Boeing and lockheed martin are for.
How?
I mean to say, Israel isn't really next door, and even if it was, NK overpowers them.
Luckily enough, our Daewoo and Samsung don't seem to be stupid.
no they dont ..ignoring the fact that the US would attack NK through israel if the need ever arised Israel has far more nukes than NK ..at a ratio of 20 to 1
they're all stupid: they profit from the deaths of innocents ...they can go **** themselves along with GE, lockheed etc
Anyway, of course noone can stop them, but we can just bomb them and take what is rightfully ours after they do so.
I think they'll prolly test it on Oct. 12th. Its a big holiday for them.
Anyway, of course noone can stop them, but we can just bomb them and take what is rightfully ours after they do so.
Don't you have grandparents or relatives that fought in the war? Don't they tell you stories about the horrors they experienced and how it's probably in your best interests to avoid "bombing them and taking what is rightfully yours"?I think they'll prolly test it on Oct. 12th. Its a big holiday for them.
Anyway, of course noone can stop them, but we can just bomb them and take what is rightfully ours after they do so.
Don't you have grandparents or relatives that fought in the war? Don't they tell you stories about the horrors they experienced and how it's probably in your best interests to avoid "bombing them and taking what is rightfully yours"?
Why are you such a keen little warmonger? You're one of those people that firms up over the sight of tanks and planes and the carnage they can deliver.
you mean take north korea? how is NK "yours" to take? wouldnt you have to kill koreans in order to take back land that belongs to .....koreans? you have a messed up sense of right and wrong Numbers ..you should probably go out and experience life more instead seeing it from the comfort of your home
Should global stability lie in the sanity of such men?yes but so far they're a danger to themselves ..they might be insane but they're not stupid ..no nation would be stupid enough to fire the first nuke and in the case of NK it would be instant suicide followed by a prolonged period of slow agonizing death for those unlucky to have survived the blast
Lol Freudian slip. I meant to say 'men' and I said 'me'.pardon?
Lol Freudian slip. I meant to say 'men' and I said 'me'.
Well that's embarrassing....
Kim Jyong is a danger to us all. Action needs to be taken. And not sanctions.ya I caught that but I still dont understand what you were getting at