P
Pseudonym_
Guest
coolio2man, you have no understanding at all of God. you have a preconcieved notion of what God and the church is al labout, and you attack that notion.
They didn't abuse boys because it was a viable alternative to abstinence, they abused them because they are sick people. They do not represent the church as a whole, no more than a few abusive teachers represents our school system as a whole.
Lack of undersdtanding of His Laws.
The act of sex is certainly not a sin. God wants us to "fuk" and multiply and be fruitful. The act of fornification is a sin, because it leads to the corruption of our society. God's laws are in place for our own benefit.
I cannot see myself commiting to a church that uses little boys for sex objects because God said you cant have sex.
They didn't abuse boys because it was a viable alternative to abstinence, they abused them because they are sick people. They do not represent the church as a whole, no more than a few abusive teachers represents our school system as a whole.
How can having sex be a sin? It feels good, its as natural as eating or pooping.
Lack of undersdtanding of His Laws.
The act of sex is certainly not a sin. God wants us to "fuk" and multiply and be fruitful. The act of fornification is a sin, because it leads to the corruption of our society. God's laws are in place for our own benefit.