OCybrManO
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2003
- Messages
- 4,780
- Reaction score
- 0
T = truth (as you probably know)Minerel said:You mean QFT.
E = emphasis
They both work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
T = truth (as you probably know)Minerel said:You mean QFT.
OCybrManO said:I'm going to start saying "QtEtTIitPPS" (Quoted to Emphasize the Truth Inherent in the Previous Poster's Statement) or "QtEtTIitAS" (Quoted to Emphasize the Truth Inherent in the Aforementioned Statement)... because it's more than 6 characters.
Well, the phrases are only at the public beta phase. I still need to iron out some of the bugs.Reginald said:It doesn't really have a ring to it, does it? :|
Opps though about E = Effort.T = truth (as you probably know)
E = emphasis
They both work.
*Jumps up and down clapping*I edited it to make us all happy.
Can I help test?Well, the phrases are only at the public beta phase. I still need to iron out some of the bugs.
Stigmata said:MOVING ON
I hope they make the remote more ergonomic. I have a remote that's shaped pretty similarly, and let me tell you it's not entirely fun to hold onto that thing for prolonged periods of time.
As long as its not something like "Nintendo 128" I will probably be happy with the name.Reginald said:They still haven't finalised the design for the controller or the console yet. So it will probably become even more sexual. Like the DS did.
What do all of you think about the naming of the console? Revolution? Or something different? They have removed the name Revolution from the recent release shots.
Agreed on all points.The Mullinator said:As long as its not something like "Nintendo 128" I will probably be happy with the name.
Although if you ask me "Revolution" is actually a pretty damn good console name on its own. I mean it has a really good ring to it, it actually sounds good when you say something like "Im going to go buy a Revolution".
Narcolepsy said:Knowing Nintendo, they'll probably settle on the "Nintendo GameSystem®".
Dumb Dude said:I highly doubt that there will be a lot of third party support for this.... They obviously made this for more stupid games like Nintendogs or other dumb games like that.
Gui! said:apart from handling, F*** you 360 F*** you PS3...what you gonna do now????
Absinthe said:I don't wish to imply that this reasonable expectation is a testament to console/game quality. I just find this notion of Nintendo owning anybody to be unfounded.
Quite simply, Nintendo doesn't need to own anybody any way. They are successful enough as it is and get rich off of what they produce. They have, time and time again, displayed quite a bit of apathy towards their competitors, doing what they feel is right and making few attempts to best the opposition. Nintendo really doesn't factor into the console "war". They function independently of the Sony/Microsoft pissing contest.
bam23 said:
That's good news, but I still don't like the idea that you have to stay within range of the sensors.
Murray_H said:"I still don't like the idea that you have to stay within range of the sensors"
What do you suggest then? Go outside their range? Then the signal won't be received.....
TheSomeone said:You rest your elbow on your lap while you play, just like how you would with a regular controller.
sinkoman said:That's not such a bad idea though? I sure hope that the final version has a built in lazer pointer.
It's for these reasons that I recommend a hearty dose of restraint before you pre-emptively use the controller as an example of repeated failure on the part of Nintendo. Especially because, at the end of the day, if Nintendo fail it will be us - gamers - who lose out on something that could be very, very cool.